Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
XIN Zhiyong, PAN Buxin, WANG Dayang, ZHANG Yongshan, ZHU Yong. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PULL-OUT PROPERTIES OF SELF-TAPPING STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS TO FIX ALUMINUM SHEETS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(1): 100-109. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20040803
Citation: XIN Zhiyong, PAN Buxin, WANG Dayang, ZHANG Yongshan, ZHU Yong. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PULL-OUT PROPERTIES OF SELF-TAPPING STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS TO FIX ALUMINUM SHEETS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(1): 100-109. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20040803

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PULL-OUT PROPERTIES OF SELF-TAPPING STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS TO FIX ALUMINUM SHEETS

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20040803
  • Received Date: 2020-08-03
    Available Online: 2021-04-30
  • Large numbers of self-tapping screws are used to fix aluminum sheets in the metal roofing system where the pull-out accidents of screw connections were reported frequently subjected to the wind uplift loads. In order to study the pull-out characteristics and presented a calculation method of self-tapping stainless steel screws to connect aluminum sheets, tensile tests of 198 connected specimens with different drilling methods, thicknesses of aluminum sheets, pitch and major diameters were conducted. Based on the results, the influences of different factors on the pull-out characteristics of self-tapping screws fixed aluminum sheets. The results indicated that the pull-out bearing capacity increased with the increase of aluminum sheet thickness, pitch and major diameters. The pull-out bearing capacity of specimens for carbon steel screw was better than that for stainless steel screw. The specimens with small pitch was susceptible of construction, which affected the pull-out bearing capacity. The test results were compared with the calculated results from the formulas recommended by codes of home and abroad. The formula for pull-out bearing capacity of self-tapping screws to fix aluminum sheets was modified. The results calculated by the modified formula fitted well with the test results.
  • 罗永峰, 郑祥杰, 郭小农,等. 铝合金屋面结构抗风连接改进及其受力性能分析[J]. 空间结构, 2013, 19(2):57-62.
    蔡昭昀. 我国金属屋面工程现状和发展趋势[J]. 中国建筑防水, 2010(22):34-38.
    于敬海, 赵彧洋, 蒋智宇,等. 直立锁边金属屋面系统关键连接节点抗拉承载力试验[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2019, 36(1):112-119.
    李元齐, 马荣奎, 何慧文. 冷弯薄壁型钢与结构用OSB板自攻螺钉连接性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2014, 35(5):48-56.
    李元齐, 帅逸群, 沈祖炎,等. 冷弯薄壁型钢自攻螺钉连接抗拉性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(12):143-152.
    MAYOORAN S, MAHENDREN M. New Pull-Out Capacity Equations for the Design of Screw Fastener Connections in Steel Cladding Systems[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018,122:439-451.
    曾滨, 惠存, 韩维池,等. S60框架幕墙系统自攻螺钉抗拉拔性能试验研究和计算方法分析[J]. 工业建筑, 2015, 45(11):176-180.
    MAHENDRAN M, TANG R B. Pull-Out Strength of Steel Roof and Wall Cladding Systems[J]. Journal of Structure, ASCE, 1998, 124(10):1192-1201.
    方文琦. 冷弯薄壁型钢自攻自钻螺钉连接抗剪承载力性能研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2010.
    中华人民共和国建设部. 冷弯薄壁型钢结构技术规范:GB 50018-2002[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2002.
    中华人民共和国建设部. 铝合金结构设计规范:GB 50429-2007[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2007.
    The Metal Cladding & Roofing Manufacturers Association. Fasteners for Metal Roof and Wall Cladding:Design, Detailing and Installation Guide[S]. Rogerstone, Newport, Gwent:The Metal Cladding & Roofing Manufacturers Association, 2010.
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 紧固件机械性能:自钻自攻螺钉:GB/T 3098.11-2002[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2003.
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 金属材料拉伸试验第一部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228.1-2010[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2011.
    American National Standards Institute. Test Standard for Determining the Strength and Deformation Characteristics of Cold-Formed Steel Connection:AISI S905[S].New York:American National Standards Institute,2008.
    British Standards Institution. Design of Aluminum Structures:Cold Formed Structural Sheeting:BS EN 1999-1-4[S]. London:British Standards Institution, 2007.
    The Aluminum Association. The Aluminum Design Manual 2010[S]. Arlington, VA:The Aluminum Association, 2010.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]MEN Jinjie, WANG Hongxiao, LAN Tao, LI Ran, LIAO Fanzhi. BEARING CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND CALCULATIONS OF DOUBLE-LAYER SHOULDER BEAMS WITH MULTI-LIMB MIDDLE COLUMNS OF CONCRETE-FILLED STEEL TUBES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 47-55,74. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20082310
    [2]CHEN Xin, LIAO Feiyu, LIN Zhiping, REN Menglu. STUDY ON DESIGN APPROACH OF THE CIRCULAR CONCRETE FILLED STAINLESS STEEL TUBE UNDER AXIAL COMPRESSION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(11): 137-144,152. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20011705
    [3]CHEN Dachuan, JIANG Yuchun, SHU Xingping, TAN Yongqiang. RESEARCH ON THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE IN-LINE WALL OF THE STRUCTURE OF STAINLESS STEEL SANDWICH PANEL UNDER AXIAL COMPRESSION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 51-58. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002008
    [4]LIAO Sha, LI Zhou, SHU Xingping. RESEARCH ON THE STABILITY BEARING CAPALITY OF THE IN-LINE WALL OF THE STRUCTURE OF STAINLESS STEEL SANDWICH PANEL UNDER ONE-WAY COMPRESSION AND BENDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 59-68. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002009
    [5]LIU Xianghua, YUAN Huanxin, DU Xinxi, HU Song, DU Yushan. ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION METHOD OF BEARING CAPACITY OF STAINLESS STEEL BOLTED T-STUBS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(4): 125-131,144. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202004022
    [6]WANG Xingzhong, LI Feng, ZHU Ruijie. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR OF STAINLESS STEEL-ALUMINUM ALLOY BOLT-BALL JOINT SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 121-125,170. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005020
    [7]LI Xiangyu, XING Guohua, ZHANG Pengyao, ZHANG Guangtai. CALCULATION ON BEARING CAPACITY OF 7075 HIGH-STRENGTH ALUMINUM ALLOY TUBULAR CONFINED CONCRETE COLUMN UNDER AXIAL COMPRESSION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(11): 162-167. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG19120618
    [13]Cao Dan Zhang Dachang, . COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF STEEL TUBULAR UNDER AXIAL COMPRESSION IN CHINESE AND FOREIGN CODES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(6): 169-174. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201506033
    [15]TEST STUDY OF BENDING AND COMPRESSING-BENDING OF EVG -3D WALL PANELS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(10): 96-100. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201510018
    [16]Shu Ganping, Zheng Baofeng, Shen Xiaoming. NEW DESIGN METHOD FOR STAINLESS STEEL COLD- FORMED TUBULAR COLUMNS UNDER AXIAL LOAD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(5): 21-28. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz2011205003
    [17]Shu Ganping, Zheng Baofeng, Shen Xiaoming. IN- PLANE STABILITY DESIGN METHOD OF STAINLESS STEEL BEAM- COLUMNS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(5): 41-44. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz2011205006
    [18]Li Qiang, Hao Jiping. ANALYSIS OF ULTIMATE CAPACITY OF STRESSED-SKIN FOR ALUMINUM ALLOY STRUCTURE WITH SEMI-RIGID CONNECTIONS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(5): 116-119,9. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201105026
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-050246810
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.5 %FULLTEXT: 8.5 %META: 89.2 %META: 89.2 %PDF: 2.3 %PDF: 2.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.7 %其他: 17.7 %其他: 2.3 %其他: 2.3 %China: 1.5 %China: 1.5 %上海: 1.5 %上海: 1.5 %东莞: 0.8 %东莞: 0.8 %保定: 0.8 %保定: 0.8 %北京: 4.6 %北京: 4.6 %南京: 2.3 %南京: 2.3 %台州: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %哈尔滨: 2.3 %哈尔滨: 2.3 %天津: 0.8 %天津: 0.8 %宿州: 0.8 %宿州: 0.8 %常德: 0.8 %常德: 0.8 %廊坊: 0.8 %廊坊: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.8 %杭州: 0.8 %杭州: 0.8 %桂林: 0.8 %桂林: 0.8 %武汉: 0.8 %武汉: 0.8 %沈阳: 0.8 %沈阳: 0.8 %温州: 0.8 %温州: 0.8 %湖州: 1.5 %湖州: 1.5 %漯河: 2.3 %漯河: 2.3 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %芒廷维尤: 17.7 %芒廷维尤: 17.7 %芝加哥: 1.5 %芝加哥: 1.5 %襄阳: 0.8 %襄阳: 0.8 %西宁: 7.7 %西宁: 7.7 %西安: 2.3 %西安: 2.3 %贵阳: 2.3 %贵阳: 2.3 %运城: 11.5 %运城: 11.5 %通化: 0.8 %通化: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.8 %郑州: 2.3 %郑州: 2.3 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %鹰潭: 0.8 %鹰潭: 0.8 %其他其他China上海东莞保定北京南京台州哈尔滨天津宿州常德廊坊张家口成都扬州晋城朝阳杭州桂林武汉沈阳温州湖州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥襄阳西宁西安贵阳运城通化邯郸郑州重庆青岛鹰潭

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (115) PDF downloads(3) Cited by(3)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return