YU Lanlan, BAI Zhiqiang, WEI Yanhui, CHEN Jing, MA Kejian. INFLUENCE OF STIFFENING PLATE ON THE STATIC MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TUBE SHEAR-RESISTANT CONNECTOR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 139-144,120. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005023
Citation:
YU Lanlan, BAI Zhiqiang, WEI Yanhui, CHEN Jing, MA Kejian. INFLUENCE OF STIFFENING PLATE ON THE STATIC MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TUBE SHEAR-RESISTANT CONNECTOR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2020, 50(5): 139-144,120. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005023
YU Lanlan, BAI Zhiqiang, WEI Yanhui, CHEN Jing, MA Kejian. INFLUENCE OF STIFFENING PLATE ON THE STATIC MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TUBE SHEAR-RESISTANT CONNECTOR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 139-144,120. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005023
Citation:
YU Lanlan, BAI Zhiqiang, WEI Yanhui, CHEN Jing, MA Kejian. INFLUENCE OF STIFFENING PLATE ON THE STATIC MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TUBE SHEAR-RESISTANT CONNECTOR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2020, 50(5): 139-144,120. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005023
INFLUENCE OF STIFFENING PLATE ON THE STATIC MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TUBE SHEAR-RESISTANT CONNECTOR
1. The Architecture Engineering College, Weifang University, Weifang 261061, China;
2. The Spatial Research Center of Guizhou University, Guiyang 550003, China
Received Date: 2019-12-20Publish Date:
2020-07-14
Abstract
The connection of square tube shear connector and H-shaped steel rib has been used in steel-concrete composite open-web sandwich plate recently. In order to study the mechanical properties of connection area, two full-scale specimens were manufactured to conduct contrast test and FEM analysis.The results showed that stiffening plate could make an obvious elastic-plastic behavior by seeting stiffening plate on the side wall of square tube shear connector. The stiffening plate could make a greater contribution to the tube's lateral stiffness and local stress concentration. Further finite element analysis showed that the width and thickness of stiffening plate, especially the plate width, had a significant effect on the stress distribution and lateral stiffness of shear connector.
References
白志强,魏艳辉,卢亚琴,等. 钢-混凝土组合空腹夹层板基本频率的参数分析[J].空间结构,2018,24(4):68-73.
姜岚, 马克俭, 张华刚,等. 协同式空腹夹层板动力特性分析及舒适度研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2017,37(6):122-131.
孙涛, 马克俭, 刘宪庆,等. 钢空腹夹层板结构等效剪切刚度分析[J]. 空间结构, 2017, 23(2):54-59.
LUAN H, MA K, QIN Y, et al. Investigation of the Structural Behavior of an Innovative Steel Open-Web Floor System[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2017, 17(4):1365-1378.
陈强,肖建春,马克俭,等.剪力键节点域对钢空腹夹层板静力特征的影响分析[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版),2018,43(1):41-49.
刘卓群, 马克俭, 肖建春,等. 混凝土板对钢空腹夹层板楼盖静力性能影响分析[J]. 广西大学学报(自然科学版), 2016(1):1-10.
刘卓群, 肖建春, 陈靖,等. 钢-混凝土组合空腹夹层板关键部位力学特性分析[J]. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版), 2015(3):119-122.
黄勇, 陈伟刚, 段莉. 钢管混凝土短柱(剪力键)受剪性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2011, 32(12):178-185.
刘卓群, 马克俭, 肖建春,等. 加劲板对钢空腹夹层板剪力键节点静力特性影响分析[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2017, 19(2):29-37.
白志强,刘晓东,邢栋,等.连接T形钢肋方钢管剪力键的静力性能试验[J].工业建筑,2018,48(10):159-164.
Relative Articles
[1] WU Qinghua. Analysis on Construction Responses of Rock Around Parallel Subway Tunnels in Inclined Stratification Rocks [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(11): 29-35,87. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22071706
[2] YANG Chao, ZOU Yongmu, LI Lei, ZHONG Zuliang, LI Yapeng. Research on Mechanisms of Water and Mud Inrush During Tunnelling in Deep and Large Fault Fracture Zones [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(3): 173-179. doi: 10.12304/j.gyjzG22061409
[3] HAN Xiaolong, LI Chaoyue, WANG Gang, YANG Zhiquan, FENG Chuangcheng, LI Ming, ZHAO Cansong, ZHANG Zehao, HE Na, WANG Xiangpeng, YE Zhangwen, YUAN Liwei, YANG Taiqiang, XI Wenfei, LI Xiaohui. Study on Diffusion Laws for Cement Slurry in Surrounding Rock of Tunnels Considering Gravity and Time-Varying Viscosity of Slurry [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(3): 38-43. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21090708
[4] CHEN Zhengfa, ZHANG Jie, YAN Zhiguo, BIAN Minghui. STUDY OF WATER AND EARTH PRESSURE MODES ON SHIELD TUNNELS IN WATER-RICH DIORITE STRATA [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 25-30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21031806
[5] Abdul Motalleb QAYTMAS, TIAN Yu, LU Dechun, DU Xiuli. INFLUENCE OF RELATIVE DENSITIES FOR SURROUNDING ROCKS ON STRATUM SUBSIDENCE DURING TUNNELLING [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 11-17. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20072217
[6] ZHAN Tao. RESEARCH ON FORECASTS FOR ULTIMATE DISPLACEMENT OF TUNNELS BASED ON THE DE-GP ALGORITHM IN CONSTRUCTION PROCESS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 184-188,133. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20081201
[7] LI Tao, ZHU Baolong, LUO Bo, WANG Xiong, LI Xin. STUDY ON LOAD-BEARING CHARACTERISTICS OF PILES AND LINING STRUCTURE FOR TUNNELS IN TUNNEL-LANDSLIDE SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT SPACEINGS OF ANTI-SLIDE PILES [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 31-38. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20040307
[8] CHEN Tianlei, NIU Mengshi, XIE Sa. “FATTING PILE EFFECT” AND CHANGE LAWS OF COLLAPSIBLE COEFFICIENTS COMPACTED WITH SDS PILES IN SELF-WEIGHT COLLAPSE LOESS FOUNDATION [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(6): 6-10. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202006002
[12] Huo Runke, Li Maoda, Li Jing, Wang Qiang, Yan Jirui. NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION PROCESS OF UNSYMMETRICAL TUNNEL IN SOFT ROCK [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(2): 95-100. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201502021
[13] Luo Bin. CONSTRUCTION METHOD FOR XIEJIADONG KARST CAVE INSIDE TUNNEL IN GUANGXI [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(03): 129-133. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201403027
[14] Zhong Zuliang, Liu Xinrong, Fang Jinbing, Li Xiaoyong, Liao Jingwei. OPTIMIZATION RESEARCH ON TUNNEL CROSSING SCHEME THROUGH ULTRA-SHALLOW AND LARGE-BIAS SECTIONS BASED ON ECONOMIC SAFETY COEFFICIENT RATIO [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(2): 78-82,171. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201302016
[15] Deng Tongfa, Luo Sihai, Nie Fusheng. THE QUASI-STATIC METHOD OF THE SEISMIC SOIL PRESSURE CALCULATION BASED ON THE STATIC EARTH PRESSURE ASSUMPTIONS IN THE CODE FOR DESIGN OF TUNNEL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(2): 83-87. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201302017
[16] Yu Jianying, Wei Gang. THE STATE AND THE ART OF THE IMPACT OF UNDERGROUND TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION ON ADJACENT BUILDINGS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(9): 116-119. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201109026
[17] Zhang Xudong, Liu Xinrong. A STUDY ON THE FEATURE AND FORMATION MECHANISM OF SUPER KARST WATER BURST IN DEEP KARST TUNNEL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(4): 79-84. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201104018
[18] Yu Yanxin, Nie Lei, Shen Shiwei, Ding Huangping. APPLICATION OF TUNNEL SEISMIC PREDICTION SYSTEM TO THE TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION OF YUXIANG EXPRESSWAY [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(5): 100-103. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201005021
[19] Yao Yong, Tian Zhi-yu. STUDY ON MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR AND REINFORCING MEASURES OF MIDDLE ROCK WALL OF PARALLEL TUNNEL WITH SMALL INTERVAL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(4): 57-60,84. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200604017
[20] Chen Wanxiang, Yang Liang, Guo Zhikun, Huang Yu, Zhang Shi. STUDY ON TEMPERATURE CONTROL OF MASS CONCRETE IN XUANWU LAKE TUNNEL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(10): 53-55. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200410016
Cited by Periodical cited type(2) 1. 戚志宇，李志清. 黄土蠕变特性研究进展. 地球科学与环境学报. 2023(03): 485-510 . 2. 王新刚，刘凯，王友林，张培栋，石卫，罗力. 典型黄土滑坡滑带土不同含水率下蠕变特性试验研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2022(05): 137-143 .
Other cited types(4)
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-05 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 2025-04 0 5 10 15 Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 14.4 % FULLTEXT : 14.4 % META : 84.6 % META : 84.6 % PDF : 1.0 % PDF : 1.0 % FULLTEXT META PDF Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Area Distribution 其他 : 7.0 % 其他 : 7.0 % China : 1.0 % China : 1.0 % 九江 : 1.0 % 九江 : 1.0 % 北京 : 5.5 % 北京 : 5.5 % 南京 : 0.5 % 南京 : 0.5 % 呼和浩特 : 0.5 % 呼和浩特 : 0.5 % 宁波 : 0.5 % 宁波 : 0.5 % 宿州 : 1.0 % 宿州 : 1.0 % 常德 : 1.0 % 常德 : 1.0 % 广州 : 0.5 % 广州 : 0.5 % 张家口 : 7.0 % 张家口 : 7.0 % 成都 : 2.5 % 成都 : 2.5 % 无锡 : 0.5 % 无锡 : 0.5 % 晋城 : 0.5 % 晋城 : 0.5 % 朝阳 : 0.5 % 朝阳 : 0.5 % 淮南 : 0.5 % 淮南 : 0.5 % 漯河 : 0.5 % 漯河 : 0.5 % 眉山 : 1.0 % 眉山 : 1.0 % 石家庄 : 0.5 % 石家庄 : 0.5 % 福州 : 0.5 % 福州 : 0.5 % 芒廷维尤 : 21.9 % 芒廷维尤 : 21.9 % 西宁 : 31.3 % 西宁 : 31.3 % 西安 : 1.5 % 西安 : 1.5 % 贵阳 : 1.5 % 贵阳 : 1.5 % 资阳 : 0.5 % 资阳 : 0.5 % 运城 : 7.5 % 运城 : 7.5 % 邯郸 : 0.5 % 邯郸 : 0.5 % 郑州 : 1.5 % 郑州 : 1.5 % 重庆 : 0.5 % 重庆 : 0.5 % 金华 : 0.5 % 金华 : 0.5 % 阳泉 : 0.5 % 阳泉 : 0.5 % 其他 China 九江 北京 南京 呼和浩特 宁波 宿州 常德 广州 张家口 成都 无锡 晋城 朝阳 淮南 漯河 眉山 石家庄 福州 芒廷维尤 西宁 西安 贵阳 资阳 运城 邯郸 郑州 重庆 金华 阳泉
Login
Register
E-alert
DownLoad: