COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DEFORMATION AND OVERLAP FOR PROFILED STEEL SHEET BY CHINESE, AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS

ZHANG Xingshuai; WU Yaohua

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz202002024

Volume 50 Issue 2

Feb. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2020 > 50(2): 158-162,136

ZHANG Xingshuai, WU Yaohua. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DEFORMATION AND OVERLAP FOR PROFILED STEEL SHEET BY CHINESE, AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 158-162,136. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002024

Citation:

ZHANG Xingshuai, WU Yaohua. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DEFORMATION AND OVERLAP FOR PROFILED STEEL SHEET BY CHINESE, AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 158-162,136. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002024

Citation:

ZHANG Xingshuai, WU Yaohua. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DEFORMATION AND OVERLAP FOR PROFILED STEEL SHEET BY CHINESE, AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 158-162,136. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002024

PDF( 3234 KB)

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DEFORMATION AND OVERLAP FOR PROFILED STEEL SHEET BY CHINESE, AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002024

Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co., Ltd., MCC Group, Beijing 100088, China

Received Date: 2019-10-20

Abstract

Abstract

Comparing the similarities and differences of structural requirements, such as the deformation of the profiled steel sheet, the length of the overlap along the longitudinal direction, and the support length at the end of the plate, in the Chinese, American and European standards, the actual reasion and structural principles were analyzed, and the manufacturer's sheet metal requirements were compared. It could be concluded that the Chinese standard had more reasonable requirements on the support length of the profiled steel-concrete composite slab than the European standard. China should standardize the deflection limit of the profiled steel sheet and its deflection under different load types, and make a detailed division. At the same time, it was recommended to seal the longitudinal plate end lap joint part of the Chinese standard, thereby reducing the overlap length of the roof panel and saving steel.
- profiled steel sheet,
- composite floor,
- deflection,
- support length,
- longitudinal overlap length

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

中华人民共和国建设部.冷弯薄壁型钢结构技术规范:GB 50018-2002[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2002.

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.压型金属板工程应用技术规范:GB 50896-2013[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2013.

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.门式刚架轻型房屋钢结构技术规范:GB 51022-2015[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.采光顶与金属屋面技术规程:JGJ 255-2012[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2020.

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑金属围护系统工程技术标准:JGJ/T 473-2019[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2017.

中国工程建设协会.组合楼板设计与施工规范:CECS 273:2010[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2010.

ASCE. Standard for The Structural Design of Composite Slabs:ANSI/ASCE 3-91[S].Gaiters-burg:American Society of Civil Engineers,1992.

MBMA. Metal Building Systems Manual[S]. Metal Building Man-ufacturers Association, Inc, 2006.

BSI. Code of Practice for the Use of Profiled Sheet for Roof and Wall Cladding on Buildings:BS 5427:2016[S].BSI Standards Limited, 2016.

BSI. Eurocode 4:Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures:BS EN 1994-1-1:2004[S]. BSI Standards Limited,2005.

相震东,吴耀华.低层轻型房屋围护面板的风荷载计算[J].钢结构(中英文),2019,34(6):83-88.

吴耀华,岳清瑞,曾滨.建(构)筑物抗震结构对钢材性能要求的研究[J].钢结构,2017,32(1):87-90.

陈以一,陈建兴,陈扬骥,等.CLP屋面板抗风承载力试验研究[J].钢结构,2003,18(2):12-15.

刘玉林.中美两国混凝土规范中板挠度变形力学模型的计算对比[J].公路工程,2016,41(6):78-81

,173.

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.砌体结构设计规范:GB 50003-2011[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.

中国建筑标准设计研究院.国家建筑标准设计图集13G440大跨度预应力空心板(跨度4.2~18.0 m)[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2014.

钟莉莉.来实Seamlok压型钢板系统在住宅屋面的应用[J].钢结构,2007,22(1):27-30.

吴耀华,张志远,纪洪广.高强度螺栓连接中钢板孔壁承压强度试验研究[J].钢结构,2015,30(12):28-31.

Relative Articles

[1]	PAN Yinggui, TIAN Shui, GU Qian, MEI Yu'an, HU Fei, CHENG Peng. Research on Deflection of Insulating Glass Under Wind Load[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(10): 153-159. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22011910
[2]	ZHANG Guowei, FENG Yang, QIN Changan, LU Qinggang, LIU Hua. Comparative Study on Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Slab Design in Chinese and European Codes[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 204-210,168. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22041004
[3]	PENG Yaping, WANG Wenchao, JIN Peng, LI Honglin, SHI Lei. Experimental Research on CFRP-concrete Two-way Composite Floor Slab Connected Without Gap Under Static Load[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(1): 205-210. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20090102
[4]	XU Jimin, XING Kuntao, GAO Xiangyu, GUO Xiaohua, WANG Ling. DEGRADATION LAWS OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES FOR PROFILED STEEL SHEETS IN ACCELERATED CORROSION ENVIRONMENTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(1): 163-168. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201908130001
[5]	LIU Dianzhong, LI Hongxian, YANG Kai. MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE TESTS AND NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF COMPOSITE CONCRETE TWO-WAY SLABS REINFORCED WITH COLD-FORMED THIN-WALL SQUARE STEEL TUBES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(10): 170-179,198. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20020408
[6]	PENG Zuqiang, CHEN Xu, MAO Dejun, YU Wenzheng, WU Kechuan. CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS OF CREEP MULTIPLIER OF COMPOSITE BEAMS IN EUROCODE 4[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(4): 145-150. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202004025
[7]	YANG, Zhengjun, ZOU. NUMERICAL RESEARCH ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF NEW PRECAST STEEL-CONCRETE LAMINATED SLAB[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 178-183. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001028
[8]	Zhou Chunli. ANALYSIS OF FLEXUAL BEARING CAPACITY OF PRESTRESSED NEW STEEL BOX CONCRETE COMPOSITE BEAM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(03): 150-157. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201403030
[9]	Wang Lai, Ma Yang, Qiu Jing. PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE ANALYSIS OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURE WITH COMPOSITE FLOOR SLAB TWO-WAY TENSION MODEL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(07): 159-163. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz2001407033
[10]	Zhang Peng, Nie Wei, Deng Yu, Qu Jian, Liu Fengtao, Ling Yaqing, Ji Shuai. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AND CALCULATION ON DEFLECTION OF THE NEW CFRP-PCPS CONCRETE BEAM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(12): 78-81,103. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201312014
[11]	Liang Xingwen, Chen Difa, Huang Xiaokun, Zhu Aiping. CALCULATION METHOD FOR DEFLECTION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE TWO-WAY SLAB-AND-BEAM FLOOR SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 71-75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304015
[12]	Chen Zongping, Yang Yibin, Zheng Shufang, Su Yisheng. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON MECHANICAL PROPERTY OF REINFORCED RECYCLED AGGREGATE COARSE CONCRETE FLOOR-SLAB[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 52-56,127. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305012
[13]	Du Huilin, Tong Genshu, Song Changyong, Zhang Lei. TORSIONAL RESTRAINTS OF CORRUGATED SHEETING TO PURLIN THROUGH SLIPPABLE CLIPS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 34-41. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304007
[14]	Gu Yan, Jiang Xinliang, Huan Xiaolin, Chang Haosong. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS ON BEARING CAPACITIES OF COMPOSITE SLABS WITH FIBER-REINFORCED GYPSUM PANEL AND REINFORCED CONCRETE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(6): 75-78. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201106016
[16]	Tong Genshu, Shao Feng. TORSIONAL RESTRAINT ON PURLINS BY CORRUGATED STEEL SHEET[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(3): 111-115,134. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201003025
[17]	Zhang Yankun, Liu Yanghua, Song Xiaoruan. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FLEXURAL BEARING CAPACITY OF PROFILED STEEL SHEET-LIGHT-WEIGHT AGGREGATE CONCRETE FLOOR SLABS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(8): 83-85. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200808021
[18]	Han Jinsheng, Cheng Wenrang, Xu Zhaodong, Dong Yuli, Lv Junli. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE BEHAVIORS OF PROFILED STEEL SHEETING_CONCRETE COMPOSITE SLABS UNDER FIRE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(3): 87-90. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200603023
[19]	Long Liping, Gu Hongyan, Cui Jia. STATIC BEHAVIOR OF STRESSED SKIN DIAPHRAGM CONNECTED WITH V840 PROFILED SHEET[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(6): 84-85,83. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200506024
[20]	Xiong Xueyu, Wang Shousheng. THE DEFLECTION CALCULATION OF EXTERNALLY PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(7): 12-15. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200407003