SEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL FACTORY BUILDINGS UNDER ELASTIC STRUCTURE DESIGN

YU Zheng; SUN Hongyang; WANG Lijun

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz201907170003

Volume 50 Issue 12

Mar. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2020 > 50(12): 55-63

HAO Zhaofeng, ZHANG Rongling, MA Lina, ALAN Kwan, NING Guixia, LI Zhiyang. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BEARING CAPACITY OF CONCRETE-FILLED STEEL TUBE (CFST) WITH DEFECTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(8): 138-144,53. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201908130009

Citation:

YU Zheng, SUN Hongyang, WANG Lijun. SEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL FACTORY BUILDINGS UNDER ELASTIC STRUCTURE DESIGN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 55-63. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201907170003

Citation:

PDF( 1450 KB)

SEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL FACTORY BUILDINGS UNDER ELASTIC STRUCTURE DESIGN

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201907170003

1. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
2. MCC Capital Engineering & Research Incorporation Limited, Beijing 100176, China;
3. School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
4. Huachengboyuan Engineering Technology Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100052, China

Received Date: 2020-05-19
Available Online: 2021-03-31

Abstract

Abstract

Standard for Seismic Design of Industrial Buildings is being compiled, in which the structural categories are divided into three categories: plastic structure, elastic-plastic structure and elastic structure. Moreover, the structural performance coefficient q used in all kinds of types is proposed to adjust the seismic effect combination. For elastic structures, it is proposed that the performance coefficient q=2.0 and q_h=2.5 can be used for seismic calculation. In this study, the existing single-story single-span and multi-span bent structure were taken as examples and considered as elastic structure, the plane calculation model was established by using the improved PKPM software. The seismic effect was calculated under different fortification intensities. Under the intensity when the stress ratio of the column exceeded 1.0 for the first time, the elastic-plastic time history analysis of large earthquakes was carried out. It was clarified that the single-story industrial factory building would not collapse in large earthquakes on the premise of meeting the requirements of elastic structure design.
- industrial building,
- seismic design,
- structural performance coefficient,
- single-story,
- bent structure

FullText(HTML)

References(4)

References

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢结构设计标准:GB 50017-2017[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2018.

王立军. 框架厂房空间结构地震反应分析[J]. 工业建筑, 1993,23(1):7-15.

侯林涛, 施刚. 单层厂房钢结构动力弹塑性分析[C]//中国钢结构协会结构稳定与疲劳分会第16届(ISSF-2018)学术交流会暨教学研讨会论文集. 2018:266-277.

FEMA. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings:FEMA 356[S]. Washington, D. C:Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHOU Xuhong, LUO Yintao, WANG Wenling, WANG Yuhang, LU Yao. Optimizational Analysis on Structural Parameters and Study on Practical Deformation Analysis Methods for High-Rise Pile Cap Foundations of Offshore Wind Turbines[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(6): 1-12. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23022210
[2]	PENG Lingyun, LIU Wen, SUN Rui. The Dynamic Model of Distribution Parameters for a Frame Structure by Base Isolation and the Regularity of Earthquake Responses[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(2): 52-58,168. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21031704
[3]	XIONG Ye, DING Yang, CHA Lyuying, CHEN Zizi, LIU Yangwu. Dynamic Characteristics of Axial Flow Compressor Foundations Considering Interaction of Foundation, Pile Foundations and Superstructures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(6): 150-155,149. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21052007
[4]	LI Shu'an, ZHANG Junhua, TIAN Shizhen, WU Jianqun, CHANG Jingcheng, WANG Yukui. RESEARCH ON BEARING CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUP PILE FOUNDATIONS CONSIDERING PILE-SOIL-CAP INTERACTION IN STRATIFIED SOIL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(8): 65-71. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201908210002
[5]	LüFanren, Shao Hongcai, Jin Yaohua. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON BEARING CAPACITY COMPARISON BETWEEN SYMMETRIC DOUBLE GROUP PILES UNDER VERTICAL LOAD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(5): 102-105. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz2011205019
[6]	Nie Weidong, Lu Jianfei. INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT COMPATIBILITY CONDITIONS BETWEEN PILE AND SOIL ON DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF A SINGLE PILE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(8): 55-59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200708015
[7]	Cao Ming, Chen Longzhu, Chen Shengli, Zheng Jianguo. AN INTEGRAL EQUATION APPROACH AND PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A FOUNDATION WITH LONG-SHORT-PILE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(5): 48-52. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200705013
[8]	Zheng Gang, Zhang Hui-dong, Liu Shuang-ju. ANALYSIS OF INTERACTION OF PILES AND SOIL ABOUT PILED CAP (FOUNDATION) WITH DIFFERENT CONNECTION BETWEEN PILE TOP AND CAP (FOUNDATION)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(6): 65-69,5. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200606019
[9]	Chen Mingzhong, Zhou Chenghui. ANALYSIS OF OPTIMUM DESIGN FOR PILED RAFT FOUNDATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(7): 36-39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200407010

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	户梦瑶，吉云鹏，胡红松，高毅超. 环向均匀脱空对方钢管混凝土柱轴压受力性能的影响. 实验力学. 2025(01): 80-90 .
2.	董军，葛世超，李国华，向学建，刘殿元. 核心砼缺陷位置对钢管混凝土承载力致损机制研究. 兰州理工大学学报. 2024(06): 107-112 .
3.	王红. 基于正交试验设计的带缺陷钢管混凝土轴压承载力分析. 施工技术(中英文). 2023(04): 111-116 .
4.	杨世胜，高岳，周继波. 填充材料对受拉弦杆构件的极限性能影响分析. 科技创新与应用. 2023(34): 70-76 .
5.	刘龙刚，杨瑞娟. 基于有限元分析的受压构件计算与验证. 自动化与仪器仪表. 2022(10): 9-13+17 .
6.	杨磊，薛晓宏，姜继果，黄正业，姜子麒. 矩形钢管混凝土柱初始缺陷随机有限元分析. 施工技术(中英文). 2022(22): 103-108+112 .

Other cited types(6)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (125) PDF downloads(7)