Li Qinshan, Wang Tiecheng, Zhao Hailong, Wang Wenxing. THE ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF TWO KINDS OF SILO HORIZONTAL SUPPORTING STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(4): 143-146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201504027
Citation:
Li Qinshan, Wang Tiecheng, Zhao Hailong, Wang Wenxing. THE ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF TWO KINDS OF SILO HORIZONTAL SUPPORTING STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(4): 143-146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201504027
Li Qinshan, Wang Tiecheng, Zhao Hailong, Wang Wenxing. THE ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF TWO KINDS OF SILO HORIZONTAL SUPPORTING STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(4): 143-146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201504027
Citation:
Li Qinshan, Wang Tiecheng, Zhao Hailong, Wang Wenxing. THE ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF TWO KINDS OF SILO HORIZONTAL SUPPORTING STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(4): 143-146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201504027
The spatial steel pipe truss and radiation beam horizontal supporting structures with the same diameter of 30 m were selected for comparison，the two models were applied with 0，800，1 600，2 400 kN loads and analyzed by the ANSYS software under different loads． The results showed that the displacement of the two finite models as the load increased． Under the same load，vertical displacement of the radiation beam support system and the spatial steel truss was not so far different． With the rod force in the elastic range，the maximum vertical displacement of two structure systems displayed a significant linear relationship as the load changed． Hence，the steel truss support system had a higher ability to withstand the load than the radiation beam support system．
Login
Register
E-alert
DownLoad: