A RESTUDY ON STABILITY OF STEEL BEAMS: INTERNATIONAL TESTS AND THEORETICAL ANALYSES( Ⅱ)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(02): 142-146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201402030
Citation:
A RESTUDY ON STABILITY OF STEEL BEAMS: INTERNATIONAL TESTS AND THEORETICAL ANALYSES( Ⅱ)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(02): 142-146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201402030
A RESTUDY ON STABILITY OF STEEL BEAMS: INTERNATIONAL TESTS AND THEORETICAL ANALYSES( Ⅱ)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(02): 142-146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201402030
Citation:
A RESTUDY ON STABILITY OF STEEL BEAMS: INTERNATIONAL TESTS AND THEORETICAL ANALYSES( Ⅱ)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(02): 142-146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201402030
This paper is focused on the test results of steel beams available in the international literature and their
numerical analyses of the inelastic lateral torsional instability. It was found: 1) The stability factors for welded beams
were smaller than those of the rolled beams; 2) the discreteness of the test results for welded beams was larger than
that of the rolled beams; 3) early test results were mainly on rolled beams,and the results were higher than more
recent tests,this was because some early tests were specifically conducted to check the tangent modulus approach to
inelastic buckling of initially straight beams using specially prepared specimens; later the relevant test results were
decreased due to the development of dual-non-linear analysis and means; 4) the unfavorable effect of initial out-ofplane
deflection was great and could not be equivalently treated by residual stresses; 5) beams with higher height-towidth
ratios of the cross section had smaller stability factors; 6) loading types had a non-negligible effect on the
stability factors; 7) at point of normalized slenderness ratio being equal to 1. 0; the lower limit of the stability factors
was 0. 6 and 0. 5 for rolled and welded beams respectively.