COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)

Tong Genshu; Zhou Weidong; Zhang Lei

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz201305023

Volume 43 Issue 5

Dec. 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2013 > 43(5): 108-114

Tong Genshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 108-114. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305023

Citation:

Tong Genshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 108-114. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305023

Citation:

Tong Genshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 108-114. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305023

PDF( 0 KB)

COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305023

1.
1. Institute of High Performance Material and Structure,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China;
2.
2. Huahui Engineering Design Group,Shaoxing 312000,China

Received Date: 2013-01-10
Publish Date: 2013-05-20

Abstract

Abstract

System performance factors for base shear determination in various codes were analyzed.In the USA, it includes overstrength factors of both the material and the structural system and the ductility, in EC 8 it contains the structural overstrength and the ductility, in Japan and China, it reflects only the ductility.Because in Japan a load factor of 1.4 is introduced, it has the biggest earthquake forces for structural design.This paper provided also detailed comments on the relations between the drift under the design seismic action and the drift under medium earthquake, and it is found that the formula in EC 8 is in consistent with its philosophy for determining its seismic action, but not without any problem.A new derivation is presented for the relation between the elastic-plastic drift and the elastic drift under design earthquake.
- drifts,
- seismic design,
- serviceability limit state,
- code

FullText(HTML)

References(12)

References

[2] GB 500112001建筑抗震设计规范[S].

童根树,周卫东,张磊.地震作用下侧移验算对比及弹塑性侧移计算公式(1)[J].工业建筑,2013,43(4):139-143.

[3] CECS 160∶2004建筑工程抗震性态设计通则(试用)[S].

[4] European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 8: Design of?Structures for Earthquake Resistance[S]. Brussels: CEN,2003.

[5] Building Seismic Safety Council. FEMA450( NEHRP ),Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New?Buildings and Other Structures Part 1: Provisions[S]. Washington?D C : Building Seismic Safety Council,National Institute of?Building Sciences,2003.

[6] 日本建筑中心.建筑物的构造规定-建筑基准法施行令第3章的解说与运用[M].1997.

[7] Miranda E. Evaluation of Site-Dependent Inelastic Seismic Design?Spectra[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,1993,119(5):1319-1338.

[8] Tong Genshu,Huang Jinqiao. Seismic Force Modification Factor?for Ductile Structures[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science,2005,16 A(8):813-825.

[9] 翟长海,谢礼立,张敏政.工程结构等强度位移比谱研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2005,37(1):45-48.

[10] 赵永峰,童根树.修正 Clough 滞回模型下的地震力调整系数[J].土木工程学报,2006,39(10):34-41.

[11] Jorge R G,Miranda E. Inelastic Displacement Ratios for?Evaluation of Structures Built on Soft Soil Sites[J]. Earthquake?Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2006,35(6):679-694.

[12] Uang C M,Maarouf A. Deflection Amplification Factor for Seismic?Design Provisions[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,1994,120(8):2423-2436.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views