COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)

Tong Gengshu; Zhou Weidong; Zhang Lei

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz201304029

Volume 43 Issue 4

Dec. 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2013 > 43(4): 139-143,174

Tong Gengshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 139-143,174. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304029

Citation:

Tong Gengshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 139-143,174. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304029

Citation:

Tong Gengshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 139-143,174. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304029

PDF( 0 KB)

COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304029

1.
1. Institute of High Performance Macterial and Structure,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China;
2.
2. Huahui Engineering Design Group,Shaoxing 312000,China?

Received Date: 2013-01-10
Publish Date: 2013-04-20

Abstract

Abstract

Comparison of drift limitations in codes and their recommendations for seismic design of building structures in China, Japan, Europe and USA was carried out.It is found through the comparison that there are drift limitations of four levels: the serviceability requirement of the return period of 8~95 years, design seismic action level, medium and strong earthquake level.The design philosophies in different codes have great differences, these are avoiding interfering the use of facilities, confining the damage to the partition wall, avoiding crack in concrete members and life save in medium and/or strong earthquake.China has the stringent requirements for the reinforced concrete structures.
- drifts,
- seismic design,
- serviceability limit state,
- code ?

FullText(HTML)

References(11)

References

[2] International Code Council. Uniform Building Code 1997[S]. California: International Conference of Building Officials,1997.

European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance[S]. Brussels: CEN,2003.

[3] Seismology Committee of Structural Engineers Association of California. SEAOC Blue Book, Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary[S]. Sacramento, California: SEAOC ,1996.

[4] Building Seismic Safety Council. FEMA450(NEHRP ). Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures Part 1: Provisions[S]. Washington, D C : Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences,2003.

[5] 日本建筑中心.建筑物的构造规定-建筑基准法施行令第3章的解说与运用[M].日本建设省建筑研究所,1997.

[6] 日本建筑学会.钢构造限界状态设计指针同解说[M].2002.

[7] 日本建筑学会.铁筋混凝土造建物的韧性保证型耐震设计指针同解说[M].2002.

[8] GB 500112001建筑抗震设计规范[S].

[9] CECS 160∶2004建筑工程抗震性态设计通则(试用)[S].

[10] Miranda E. Evaluation of Site-Dependent Inelastic Seismic Design Spectra[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,1993,119(5):1319-1338.

[11] Tong Genshu, Huang Jinqiao. Seismic Force Modification Factor for Ductile Structures[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science,2005,16 A(8):813-825.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views