SEISMIC EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL COMPOSITE WALL STRUCTURE BASED ON IDA

Huang Wei; Jiang Xiaoping; Zhang Chenghua; Chen Xin; Zhang Yin; Xu Qin

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz201208001

Volume 42 Issue 8

Dec. 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2012 > 42(8): 1-5

Huang Wei, Jiang Xiaoping, Zhang Chenghua, Chen Xin, Zhang Yin, Xu Qin. SEISMIC EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL COMPOSITE WALL STRUCTURE BASED ON IDA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(8): 1-5. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201208001

Citation:

Huang Wei, Jiang Xiaoping, Zhang Chenghua, Chen Xin, Zhang Yin, Xu Qin. SEISMIC EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL COMPOSITE WALL STRUCTURE BASED ON IDA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(8): 1-5. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201208001

Citation:

PDF( 0 KB)

SEISMIC EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL COMPOSITE WALL STRUCTURE BASED ON IDA

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201208001

1.
School of Civil Engineering,Xi'an University of Architecture &Technology,Xi'an 710055,China

Received Date: 2012-04-17
Publish Date: 2012-08-20

Abstract

Abstract

This design method makes up the defects of traditional single seismic design method based on the lifesafety, and can reliably assure the functions of structure not lose and not affected in the earthquake．It is adopted IDAto analyze the anti-earthquake performance of ecological composite wall structure, and put forward the determinationmethod of quantitative seimic performance objective of ecological composite wall structure, and then gets the thecollapsed reservation coefficient of structure through the analysis of IDA curve, and finally evaluates seismicperformance of ecological composite wall structure．The analysis of engineering example shows that under 8 degreeearthquake ( fortification intensity of this region), the collapse probability of ecological composite wall structure islow, about 7. 5 per cent, so its seismic performance is good．
- multi-ribbed slab wall structure,
- IDA,
- non-linear dynamic analysis,
- seismic resistance ability

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

黄炜,陈国新,姚谦峰,等.密肋复合墙体在拟动力试验下的抗震性能研究[J].振动与冲击,2007,26(3):49-65.

[2] Bertero V V.Strength and Deformation Capacities of BuildingsUnder Extreme Environments[C]∥Structural Engineering andStructural Mechanics,Pister K S(ed.).Englewood:Prentice2Hall,1977:211-215.

[3] Nassar A A,Krawinkler H.Seismic Hazard for SDOF and MDOFSystems[R].Stanford:Stanford University.Blume EarthquakeEngineering Center,1991.

[4] FEMA.Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteriafor Existing Welded Steel Moment2 f Rame Buildings[R].Washington D C:SAC Joint Venture,Federal EmergencyManagement Agency,2000.

[5] 曹炳政,罗奇峰,陈玉成,等.需求能力系数法及其在性能评估中的应用[J].华东交通大学学报,2004,21(1):12-18.

[6] 马千里,叶列平,陆新征,等.采用逐步增量弹塑性时程方法对RC框架结构推覆分析侧力模式的研究[J].建筑结构学报,2008,29(2):132-137.

[7] GB500112001建筑抗震设计规范[S].

[8] JGJ32002高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程[S].

[9] FEMA.NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation ofBuildings[R].Washington DC:SAC Joint Venture,FederalEmergency Management Agency,1997.

[10] Vamvat Sikos D,Cornell C A.Incremental Dynamic Analysis[J].Eart Hquake Engineering and St Ructural Dynamics,2002,31(3):491-502.

[11] 周颖,吕西林,卢文胜,等.双塔连体高层混合结构抗震性能研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2008,28(5):71-75.

[12] 姚谦峰,张旭峰,黄炜.密肋复合墙体受力性能的宏模型静力弹塑性分析[J].世界地震工程,2008(4):111-116.

[13] 王爱民.中高层密肋壁板结构密肋复合墙体受力性能及设计方法研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2006.

[14] Vamvatskos D.Seismic Performance,Capacity and Reliability ofStructures as Seen Through Incremental Dynamic Analysis[D]Stanford CA:Stanford University,2002.

[15] Chopra A K.Dynamics of Structures:Theory and Applications toEarthquake Engineering[M].2nd ed.Englewood:Prentice2Hall,2005:101-103.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views