COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SITE CLASSFICATION AND SITE EFFECTS BETWEEN CHINESE CODE GB50011—2001 AND FEMA450

Lu Huaxi; Liang Pingying; Qiu Zaosheng

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz200906019

Volume 39 Issue 6

Dec. 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2009 > 39(6): 79-83

Xu Qingyang, Li Aiqun, Shen Shungao. RESEARCH OF SEISMIC ENERGY DISSIPATION METHOD FOR LONG-SPAN SPACE TRUSS STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(7): 85-88. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200707025

Citation:

Lu Huaxi, Liang Pingying, Qiu Zaosheng. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SITE CLASSFICATION AND SITE EFFECTS BETWEEN CHINESE CODE GB50011—2001 AND FEMA450[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(6): 79-83. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200906019

Xu Qingyang, Li Aiqun, Shen Shungao. RESEARCH OF SEISMIC ENERGY DISSIPATION METHOD FOR LONG-SPAN SPACE TRUSS STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(7): 85-88. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200707025

Citation:

PDF( 0 KB)

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SITE CLASSFICATION AND SITE EFFECTS BETWEEN CHINESE CODE GB50011—2001 AND FEMA450

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200906019

1.
School of Civil Engineering,East China Jiaotong University,Nanchang 330013,China

Received Date: 2009-01-12
Publish Date: 2009-06-20

Abstract

Abstract

The difference of site classification and site effects between Chinese Code GB 500112001 and FEMA450 is studied in this paper.Firstly,comparative analysis of site class of ordinary site,site with soft interlayer within 20 m depth and site with soft soil layer below 20m depth is presented,it is found that the thickness of soft soil layer is more vulnerable to change site class of FEMA450 than that of GB500112001 for site with soft interlayer within 20 m depth,and more careful to be considered in FEMA450 for site with soft soil layer below 20m depth.Then,the response spectrums at all sites under different ground shaking are compared,and the results indicate that the effects of soil conditions on ground motion characteristics is more reasonable to be considered in FEMA450 than that in GB500112001.
- seismic design,
- site classification,
- site effects,
- comparison

FullText(HTML)

References(8)

References

[2] 郭明珠,陈厚群.场地类别划分与抗震设计反应谱的讨论[J].世界地震工程,2003,19(2):108-111;

薄景山,翟庆生,刘红帅,等.场地分类及其在我国的演变[J].自然灾害学报,2004,13(3):44-49;

[3] 薄景山,李秀领,李山有.场地条件对地震动影响研究的若干进展[J].世界地震工程,2003,19(2):11-15;

[4] 赵艳,郭明珠,吴焕娟,等.关于改进我国抗震设计反应谱的探讨[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,26(3):47-50;

[5] 罗开海.建筑抗震设防标准和性能设计方法研究:中美欧抗震设计规范比较分析[R].北京:中国建筑科学研究院,2005;

[6] GB 50011-2001建筑抗震设计规范[S];

[7] Building Seismic Safety Council,Federal Emergency ManagementAgency,National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program.NEHRPRecommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings andOther Structures(FEMA450),Part 1:Provisions,(2003 ed)[S].Washington D C:Building Seismic Safety Council,2004;

[8] Building Seismic Safety Council,Federal Emergency ManagementAgency,National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program.NEHRPRecommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings andOther Structures(FEMA450),Part 2:Commentary,(2003 ed)[S].Washington D C:Building Seismic Safety Council,2004.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Rong, WANG Bin. Field Tests and Numerical Simulations on Dynamic Characteristics of Loess Slopes[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 169-176. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21122715
[2]	YU Zheng, SUN Hongyang, WANG Lijun. SEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL FACTORY BUILDINGS UNDER ELASTIC STRUCTURE DESIGN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 55-63. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201907170003
[3]	Huang Wei, Zhang Min, Zhang Chenghua, Jiang Xiaoping, Hou Lina. STUDY OF METHOD OF DISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF MULTI-LAYER ECOLOGICAL COMPOSITE WALL STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(09): 68-73.
[4]	Yin Jiang, Hu Qigao, Li Peng. THE INFLUENCE OF VERTICAL EFFECT OF NEAR-FAULT EARTHQUAKE ON DISPLACEMENT DEMAND OF STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(6): 60-66. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201306014
[5]	Tong Gengshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 139-143,174. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304029
[6]	Tong Genshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 108-114. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305023
[7]	Liu Wei, Shu Ganping, Shi Mingzheng. SEISMIC DESIGN OF A SUPER-HIGH TWINS TOWERS IN TAICANG AND MECHANICAL ANALYSIS FOR ITS KEY JOINTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(10): 174-178. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201310035
[8]	Li Junfeng, Xu Yan, Yang Xiaodong. OPTIMIZATION DESIGN OF HIGH-RISE SHEAR WALL STRUCTURE WITH STAGGERED STORIES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(12): 151-155. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201212033
[9]	Zhao Yuxing, Yang Qing, Li Liyong. SEISMIC DESIGN BY SEMI-SLIP-SUPPORTED STAIRS FOR REASONABLE STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OF THE FRAME BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(1): 94-97,148. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201201018
[10]	Fang Shisheng, Wang Wei, Fang Fei, Wang Sihong, Xu Fengzhi. SEISMIC DESIGN AND ANALYSIS ON A HIGH BUILDING WITH MANY ITEMS EXCEEDING CODE LIMIT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(3): 159-163,153. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201203033
[11]	Lu Huaxi, Liang Pingying, Qiu Zaosheng. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF SOFT SOIL LAYER ON SITE CLASSIFICATION BETWEEN CHINESE CODE GB 50011—2001 AND EUROCODE 8[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(2): 82-85. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201002019
[12]	Liu Huaqi, Sun Zhijian, Zhan Li. THE PLANNINGOF THE SECOND AND THE THIRD PARTOF YANSHAN UNIVERSITYWEST CAMPUS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(2): 64-66,71. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200902008
[13]	Pan Zhihong, Li Aiqun. PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN METHOD FOR BUILDINGS:DISCUSSION ON APPLICATION OF "GENERAL RULE FOR PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDINGS" TO DESIGN OF BUILDINGS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(7): 103-106. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200807026
[14]	Zhou Huazhang, Wu Yue, Li Xin. RESEARCH ON THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM OF ASEISMIC DESIGN FOR CABLE -TRUSS -SUPPORTED GLASS CURTAIN WALLS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(10): 76-79. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200710021
[15]	Mao Xiaoyong, Xiao Yan. DISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF CIRCULAR CFT COLUMNS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(8): 28-30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200708008
[16]	Wu Shu-guang, Chang Ye-jun. A STUDY ON EARTHQUAKE DISASTER PREDICTION OF MULTI-STORY RESIDENCE BUILDIGN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(7): 49-52. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200607012
[17]	Zou Yun, LüXilin. THEORY AND METHOD OF PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(9): 1-5.
[18]	Zhang Yangnian, Fang Ying, Cai Liang, Yu Weiping. A COMPARISION OF ENERGY SAVING OF BUILDING TECHNOLOGY BETWEEN CHINA AND WESTERN COUNTRIES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(2): 36-39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200502010
[19]	Li Liangfeng, Lin Jianhua. SYNTHETIC FUZZY EVALUATION FOR THE SITE TYPES BASED ON THE SEISMIC DESIGN NEW CODE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(7): 78-80,82. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200407022
[20]	Qian Jiaru, Li Gengqin. STUDY ON APPLICATION OF SPECIAL-SHAPED COLUMNS TO BUILDINGS WITH SEISMIC FORTIFICATION INTENSITY 8[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(2): 28-32. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200402010