Duan Hongxia, Li Zhengliang. RESEARCH ON DESIGN MEASURES FOR SEISMIC RESISTANCE OF RC MEGA-FRAME STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(1): 22-26. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200601008
Citation:
Li Chengzhong, Ji Weibing, Wu Jing. ACTUALIZATION AND VERIFICATION OF NO-JOINT DEISNG OF AN OVER-LONG TALL BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2008, 38(8): 109-113. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200808029
Duan Hongxia, Li Zhengliang. RESEARCH ON DESIGN MEASURES FOR SEISMIC RESISTANCE OF RC MEGA-FRAME STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(1): 22-26. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200601008
Citation:
Li Chengzhong, Ji Weibing, Wu Jing. ACTUALIZATION AND VERIFICATION OF NO-JOINT DEISNG OF AN OVER-LONG TALL BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2008, 38(8): 109-113. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200808029
ACTUALIZATION AND VERIFICATION OF NO-JOINT DEISNG OF AN OVER-LONG TALL BUILDING
1.
1. Yancheng Architecture Design &Research Institute Co.,Ltd.Yancheng 224002;
2.
2. Southeast University Nanjing 210096
Received Date: 2007-12-25Publish Date:
2008-08-20
Abstract
By the no-joint design of a 103 m long sickroom building,it is analyzed the tensile stress caused by concrete shrinkage and temperature decreasing,also put forward a series of techniques to control the cracks.Post-poured strip was used to enhance the prestressing effect of steel bars.It is verified the distribution regularity of temperature stress and shrinkage stress and effectiveness of the above techniques by stress detecting during and after construction.
References
[2] 嵇蔚冰.某超长高层建筑的无缝设计.建筑科学,2006(2):81-84
王铁梦.工程结构裂缝控制.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997:3-9
[3] 游宝坤.混凝土建筑结构裂缝控制的技术措施.建筑结构,2002(10):22-25
[4] 东南大学.盐城市第一人民医院病房楼预应力施工及温度应力测试分析报告:[研究报告].南京:东南大学.2006:11-31
Relative Articles
[1] WANG Linghui, ZHANG Cuina, XIE Tian. Research on Spatial Structure and Optimization of Chaoshan Village Based on Spatial Syntax and Social Network: Taking Chengyanggang Village in Shantou City as an Example [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(11): 163-171. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22030602
[2] YANG Chao. Element Restoration—A Minimalist Methodology on Architecture and Urban Design [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(7): 32-42,101. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22050606
[3] GUO Yiyang, LEI Guoping, ZHANG Luyang, LU Zhong. Research on Spatial Characteristics of Floor Area Ratio in Shenyang Based on Multi-Source Data [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(8): 71-77,15. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21091804
[4] JIN Yunfeng, LI Tao. SELF-ORGANIZED TIME-SPATIAL EVOLUTION MECHANISM OF URBAN-RURAL GREEN SPACE SYSTEM FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ORGANIC RENEWAL IN SHANGHAI [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 69-75,88. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002010
[6] Xue Suduo, Liu Yi, Li Xiongyan. ADVANCES AND PROSPECTS FOR LARGE SPAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE CONSIDERING COOPERATIVE WORK [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(1): 1-9. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201501001
[7] Liao Bing, Luo Yongfeng. RESEARCH ON SEISMIC RESPONSE COMPONENTS OF LARGE-SPAN SPATIAL STRUCTURES [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(2): 107-113. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201502023
[8] Zhao Jida, Lan Tian. THIRTY YEARS PROGRESS AND FUTURE PROSPECT OF SPATIAL STRUCTURES IN CHINA [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 131-138,164. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304028
[9] Liu Xiliang. THE DEVELOPMENT OF SPATIAL GRID STRUCTURES IN CHINA IN THE LAST THIRTY YEARS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 103-107. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305022
[10] Xue Suduo, Zhang Yigang, Cao Zi, Li Xiongyan. PROSPECT AND FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC RESEARCH ON SPATIAL STRUCTURES OVER LAST THIRTY YEARS IN CHINA [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(6): 105-116. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201306022
[11] Xiong Xueyu, Yang Jingping. COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF CABLE AND ROD IN THE LONG-SPAN SPACE STRUCTURE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(3): 138-142,101. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201203029
[12] Liu Yongde, Luo Mengxiao. INNOVATION AND INTERACTION OF BUILDING STRUCTURE AND BODY SHAPE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(8): 166-168. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201208033
[13] Liu Hongbo, Chen Zhihua, Zhou Ting. A NEW SPATIAL STRUCTURES：CABLE SUPPORTED ARCH-DOME STRUCTURES [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(8): 10-12. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201008003
[14] Zhou Zhen, Meng Shaoping, Wu Jing, Jiang Jianfeng, Chen Yachun. ANALYSIS METHODS FOR THE WHOLE PRESTRESSING PROCESS OF HYBRIDIZED SPACE STRUCTURE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(9): 91-95. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200809026
[15] Yin Lingfeng, Guo Xiaoming, Zhao Huilin, . SUMMARY OF KEY THEORIES AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT OF SHEET SPACE STRUCTURES [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(11): 14-18. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200411004
[16] Ma Jun, Zhao Caiqi, Zhao Huilin. RESEARCH ON THE SHEET SPACE STRUCTURES SYSTEM(SSS)IN OVERPASS BRIDGE AND ITS ENGINEERING PRACTICE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(11): 19-20,33. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200411005
[17] Zhao Huilin, Han Chongqing, Yin Lingfeng, Ma Jun, Zhao Caiqi, Guo Xiaoming, She Yinghe, Sun Hongyu, Zhang Qinglin. STRUCTURAL PRINCIPLE AND LECTOTYPE OF THE SHEET SPACE STRUCTURE SYSTEM [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(11): 1-4. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200411001
Cited by Periodical cited type(0) Other cited types(2)
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-05 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 2025-04 0 5 10 15 20 Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 12.9 % FULLTEXT : 12.9 % META : 85.2 % META : 85.2 % PDF : 2.0 % PDF : 2.0 % FULLTEXT META PDF Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Area Distribution 其他 : 12.5 % 其他 : 12.5 % China : 3.1 % China : 3.1 % 上海 : 0.8 % 上海 : 0.8 % 中山 : 0.4 % 中山 : 0.4 % 丽水 : 0.4 % 丽水 : 0.4 % 北京 : 3.9 % 北京 : 3.9 % 十堰 : 0.4 % 十堰 : 0.4 % 南京 : 1.6 % 南京 : 1.6 % 台州 : 2.3 % 台州 : 2.3 % 哈尔滨 : 0.4 % 哈尔滨 : 0.4 % 唐山 : 0.8 % 唐山 : 0.8 % 嘉兴 : 0.4 % 嘉兴 : 0.4 % 天津 : 0.4 % 天津 : 0.4 % 宣城 : 0.4 % 宣城 : 0.4 % 宿州 : 1.2 % 宿州 : 1.2 % 常德 : 0.8 % 常德 : 0.8 % 广州 : 0.8 % 广州 : 0.8 % 张家口 : 0.4 % 张家口 : 0.4 % 成都 : 2.3 % 成都 : 2.3 % 扬州 : 0.4 % 扬州 : 0.4 % 无锡 : 1.2 % 无锡 : 1.2 % 昆明 : 0.4 % 昆明 : 0.4 % 晋城 : 0.4 % 晋城 : 0.4 % 朝阳 : 0.4 % 朝阳 : 0.4 % 杭州 : 2.0 % 杭州 : 2.0 % 武汉 : 1.6 % 武汉 : 1.6 % 汕头 : 0.4 % 汕头 : 0.4 % 江门 : 0.4 % 江门 : 0.4 % 泸州 : 0.4 % 泸州 : 0.4 % 温州 : 0.8 % 温州 : 0.8 % 渭南 : 0.4 % 渭南 : 0.4 % 湖州 : 0.4 % 湖州 : 0.4 % 漯河 : 2.0 % 漯河 : 2.0 % 石家庄 : 0.4 % 石家庄 : 0.4 % 福州 : 1.2 % 福州 : 1.2 % 秦皇岛 : 0.4 % 秦皇岛 : 0.4 % 绍兴 : 0.4 % 绍兴 : 0.4 % 芒廷维尤 : 3.5 % 芒廷维尤 : 3.5 % 苏州 : 0.8 % 苏州 : 0.8 % 蚌埠 : 0.4 % 蚌埠 : 0.4 % 西宁 : 38.7 % 西宁 : 38.7 % 西安 : 0.4 % 西安 : 0.4 % 贵阳 : 0.4 % 贵阳 : 0.4 % 运城 : 6.3 % 运城 : 6.3 % 邯郸 : 0.4 % 邯郸 : 0.4 % 郑州 : 1.2 % 郑州 : 1.2 % 长治 : 0.8 % 长治 : 0.8 % 阳泉 : 0.4 % 阳泉 : 0.4 % 黄山 : 0.4 % 黄山 : 0.4 % 其他 China 上海 中山 丽水 北京 十堰 南京 台州 哈尔滨 唐山 嘉兴 天津 宣城 宿州 常德 广州 张家口 成都 扬州 无锡 昆明 晋城 朝阳 杭州 武汉 汕头 江门 泸州 温州 渭南 湖州 漯河 石家庄 福州 秦皇岛 绍兴 芒廷维尤 苏州 蚌埠 西宁 西安 贵阳 运城 邯郸 郑州 长治 阳泉 黄山
Login
Register
E-alert
DownLoad: