Cheng Xiaoyan, Du Xinxi, Shi Hao, Sheng Guoping, Liu Daoyuan, Dang Lei. EXPERIMENT AND ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE FRAME BEAM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(5): 94-95. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200705023
Citation:
Cheng Xiaoyan, Du Xinxi, Shi Hao, Sheng Guoping, Liu Daoyuan, Dang Lei. EXPERIMENT AND ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE FRAME BEAM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2007, 37(5): 94-95. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200705023
Cheng Xiaoyan, Du Xinxi, Shi Hao, Sheng Guoping, Liu Daoyuan, Dang Lei. EXPERIMENT AND ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE FRAME BEAM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(5): 94-95. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200705023
Citation:
Cheng Xiaoyan, Du Xinxi, Shi Hao, Sheng Guoping, Liu Daoyuan, Dang Lei. EXPERIMENT AND ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE FRAME BEAM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2007, 37(5): 94-95. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200705023
EXPERIMENT AND ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE FRAME BEAM
1.
1 School of Civil and Architectural Engineering,Wuhan University Wuhan 430072;
2.
2 Wuhan Guangshun Group Co.,Ltd.Wuhan 430015
Received Date: 2006-10-20Publish Date:
2007-05-20
Abstract
In negative moment region of composite frame beam,its design and the detail of struction are more complicated than that of simply supported composite beam,so it was seldom adopted in project.The test on a new-type composite frame beam is introduced.The testing results show that the composite frame beam is secure and reliable when adopted in the steel structure of residence.The design calculating values is conservative compared with those of the test.
References
[2] 杜新喜,施浩.小高层住宅钢结构的研究//科技进步与对策.武汉勘察设计专辑.北京:科学出版社,2004:70-72
杜新喜,施浩.组合框架梁在住宅钢结构中的应用.钢结构,2004,19(增刊):410-414
[3] GB 50017-2003 钢结构设计规范
Relative Articles
[1] WU Qinghua. Analysis on Construction Responses of Rock Around Parallel Subway Tunnels in Inclined Stratification Rocks [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(11): 29-35,87. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22071706
[2] YANG Chao, ZOU Yongmu, LI Lei, ZHONG Zuliang, LI Yapeng. Research on Mechanisms of Water and Mud Inrush During Tunnelling in Deep and Large Fault Fracture Zones [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(3): 173-179. doi: 10.12304/j.gyjzG22061409
[3] HAN Xiaolong, LI Chaoyue, WANG Gang, YANG Zhiquan, FENG Chuangcheng, LI Ming, ZHAO Cansong, ZHANG Zehao, HE Na, WANG Xiangpeng, YE Zhangwen, YUAN Liwei, YANG Taiqiang, XI Wenfei, LI Xiaohui. Study on Diffusion Laws for Cement Slurry in Surrounding Rock of Tunnels Considering Gravity and Time-Varying Viscosity of Slurry [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(3): 38-43. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21090708
[4] CHEN Zhengfa, ZHANG Jie, YAN Zhiguo, BIAN Minghui. STUDY OF WATER AND EARTH PRESSURE MODES ON SHIELD TUNNELS IN WATER-RICH DIORITE STRATA [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 25-30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21031806
[5] Abdul Motalleb QAYTMAS, TIAN Yu, LU Dechun, DU Xiuli. INFLUENCE OF RELATIVE DENSITIES FOR SURROUNDING ROCKS ON STRATUM SUBSIDENCE DURING TUNNELLING [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 11-17. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20072217
[6] ZHAN Tao. RESEARCH ON FORECASTS FOR ULTIMATE DISPLACEMENT OF TUNNELS BASED ON THE DE-GP ALGORITHM IN CONSTRUCTION PROCESS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 184-188,133. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20081201
[7] LI Tao, ZHU Baolong, LUO Bo, WANG Xiong, LI Xin. STUDY ON LOAD-BEARING CHARACTERISTICS OF PILES AND LINING STRUCTURE FOR TUNNELS IN TUNNEL-LANDSLIDE SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT SPACEINGS OF ANTI-SLIDE PILES [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 31-38. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20040307
[8] CHEN Tianlei, NIU Mengshi, XIE Sa. “FATTING PILE EFFECT” AND CHANGE LAWS OF COLLAPSIBLE COEFFICIENTS COMPACTED WITH SDS PILES IN SELF-WEIGHT COLLAPSE LOESS FOUNDATION [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(6): 6-10. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202006002
[12] Huo Runke, Li Maoda, Li Jing, Wang Qiang, Yan Jirui. NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION PROCESS OF UNSYMMETRICAL TUNNEL IN SOFT ROCK [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(2): 95-100. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201502021
[13] Luo Bin. CONSTRUCTION METHOD FOR XIEJIADONG KARST CAVE INSIDE TUNNEL IN GUANGXI [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(03): 129-133. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201403027
[14] Zhong Zuliang, Liu Xinrong, Fang Jinbing, Li Xiaoyong, Liao Jingwei. OPTIMIZATION RESEARCH ON TUNNEL CROSSING SCHEME THROUGH ULTRA-SHALLOW AND LARGE-BIAS SECTIONS BASED ON ECONOMIC SAFETY COEFFICIENT RATIO [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(2): 78-82,171. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201302016
[15] Deng Tongfa, Luo Sihai, Nie Fusheng. THE QUASI-STATIC METHOD OF THE SEISMIC SOIL PRESSURE CALCULATION BASED ON THE STATIC EARTH PRESSURE ASSUMPTIONS IN THE CODE FOR DESIGN OF TUNNEL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(2): 83-87. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201302017
[16] Yu Jianying, Wei Gang. THE STATE AND THE ART OF THE IMPACT OF UNDERGROUND TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION ON ADJACENT BUILDINGS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(9): 116-119. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201109026
[17] Zhang Xudong, Liu Xinrong. A STUDY ON THE FEATURE AND FORMATION MECHANISM OF SUPER KARST WATER BURST IN DEEP KARST TUNNEL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(4): 79-84. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201104018
[18] Yu Yanxin, Nie Lei, Shen Shiwei, Ding Huangping. APPLICATION OF TUNNEL SEISMIC PREDICTION SYSTEM TO THE TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION OF YUXIANG EXPRESSWAY [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(5): 100-103. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201005021
[19] Yao Yong, Tian Zhi-yu. STUDY ON MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR AND REINFORCING MEASURES OF MIDDLE ROCK WALL OF PARALLEL TUNNEL WITH SMALL INTERVAL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(4): 57-60,84. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200604017
[20] Chen Wanxiang, Yang Liang, Guo Zhikun, Huang Yu, Zhang Shi. STUDY ON TEMPERATURE CONTROL OF MASS CONCRETE IN XUANWU LAKE TUNNEL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(10): 53-55. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200410016
Cited by Periodical cited type(2) 1. 戚志宇，李志清. 黄土蠕变特性研究进展. 地球科学与环境学报. 2023(03): 485-510 . 2. 王新刚，刘凯，王友林，张培栋，石卫，罗力. 典型黄土滑坡滑带土不同含水率下蠕变特性试验研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2022(05): 137-143 .
Other cited types(4)
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-05 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 2025-04 0 5 10 15 Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 14.4 % FULLTEXT : 14.4 % META : 84.6 % META : 84.6 % PDF : 1.0 % PDF : 1.0 % FULLTEXT META PDF Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Area Distribution 其他 : 7.0 % 其他 : 7.0 % China : 1.0 % China : 1.0 % 九江 : 1.0 % 九江 : 1.0 % 北京 : 5.5 % 北京 : 5.5 % 南京 : 0.5 % 南京 : 0.5 % 呼和浩特 : 0.5 % 呼和浩特 : 0.5 % 宁波 : 0.5 % 宁波 : 0.5 % 宿州 : 1.0 % 宿州 : 1.0 % 常德 : 1.0 % 常德 : 1.0 % 广州 : 0.5 % 广州 : 0.5 % 张家口 : 7.0 % 张家口 : 7.0 % 成都 : 2.5 % 成都 : 2.5 % 无锡 : 0.5 % 无锡 : 0.5 % 晋城 : 0.5 % 晋城 : 0.5 % 朝阳 : 0.5 % 朝阳 : 0.5 % 淮南 : 0.5 % 淮南 : 0.5 % 漯河 : 0.5 % 漯河 : 0.5 % 眉山 : 1.0 % 眉山 : 1.0 % 石家庄 : 0.5 % 石家庄 : 0.5 % 福州 : 0.5 % 福州 : 0.5 % 芒廷维尤 : 21.9 % 芒廷维尤 : 21.9 % 西宁 : 31.3 % 西宁 : 31.3 % 西安 : 1.5 % 西安 : 1.5 % 贵阳 : 1.5 % 贵阳 : 1.5 % 资阳 : 0.5 % 资阳 : 0.5 % 运城 : 7.5 % 运城 : 7.5 % 邯郸 : 0.5 % 邯郸 : 0.5 % 郑州 : 1.5 % 郑州 : 1.5 % 重庆 : 0.5 % 重庆 : 0.5 % 金华 : 0.5 % 金华 : 0.5 % 阳泉 : 0.5 % 阳泉 : 0.5 % 其他 China 九江 北京 南京 呼和浩特 宁波 宿州 常德 广州 张家口 成都 无锡 晋城 朝阳 淮南 漯河 眉山 石家庄 福州 芒廷维尤 西宁 西安 贵阳 资阳 运城 邯郸 郑州 重庆 金华 阳泉
Login
Register
E-alert
DownLoad: