DISCUSSION OF CONNECTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR COMPOSITE JOINT

Zheng Desheng; Hu Xiamin

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz200511009

Volume 35 Issue 11

Dec. 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2005 > 35(11): 31-34

Zheng Desheng, Hu Xiamin. DISCUSSION OF CONNECTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR COMPOSITE JOINT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(11): 31-34. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200511009

Citation:

Zheng Desheng, Hu Xiamin. DISCUSSION OF CONNECTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR COMPOSITE JOINT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(11): 31-34. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200511009

Zheng Desheng, Hu Xiamin. DISCUSSION OF CONNECTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR COMPOSITE JOINT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(11): 31-34. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200511009

Citation:

Zheng Desheng, Hu Xiamin. DISCUSSION OF CONNECTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR COMPOSITE JOINT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(11): 31-34. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200511009

PDF( 0 KB)

DISCUSSION OF CONNECTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR COMPOSITE JOINT

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200511009

1.
College of Civil Engineering,Nanjing University of Technology Nanjing 210009

Received Date: 2005-05-10
Publish Date: 2005-11-20

Abstract

Abstract

Some connection classification systems presented by scholars were reviewed.The systems were applied in the composite joints in this paper.From endplate composite joint specimens test result conducted by authors, it was found that the classification system by Bjorhovde et al do not require the detail of the joints in calculation but often lead to mistakes, the criteria of classification in EC3 is basically suitable for the application in composite joints and the classification system presented by Nethercot et al is too conservative.Compared with these three methods, the nonlinear moment-rotation curves model is more accurate to categorize a real connection into any of three types: rigid, semi_rigid or flexible, if the calculation parameters are determinated based on the test.
- composite joints, semi rigid, connection classification,

FullText(HTML)

References(9)

References

Hasan Rvafiq, Kishi Norimitsu, Chen Waifah. A New Nonlinear Connection Classification System. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1998, 47: 119～140

[2] Bjorhovde, Colson R, Brozzetti A. Classification System for Beam-to-Column Connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1990, 116(11): 76～3 059

[3] Eurocode 3. Design of Steel Structure, Part1-1:General Rules and Rules for Building.DD ENV 1993-1-1: European Committee for Standardisation (CEN),1992

[4] Kishi N, Hasan R. Study of Eurocode 3 Steel Connection Classification. Engineering and Structure, 1997, 19(9): 772～779

[5] Nethercot D A, Li T Q, Ahmed B. Unified Classification System for Beam-to-Column Connection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1998, 45(1): 39～65

[6] Yoshiaki Goto, Satoshi Miyashita. Classification System for Rigid and Semirigid Connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1998, 124(7):57～750

[7] 胡夏闽, 过轶青, 刘建平. 半刚性组合节点初始转动刚度计算. 工业建筑,2004, 34(3):71～73

[8] Hu Xiamin, Zheng Desheng, Yang Li. Experimental Study on Composite Joints Subjected to Reversal of Loading.ln: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Nanjing:2004. 295～303

[9] Aribert J M, Lachal A, Dinga O N. Classification and Behavior Prediction of Beam-to-Column Composite Joints in Braced Frames.Kaiserslautern:Verbundkonstruktionen-Neus aus Forschung, Entwicklung and Normung,1997

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views