以公共交通为导向的发展模式(TOD)型社区步行环境感知评价及优化建议——以成都市为例

陈岚; 许春敏; 陈春华; 谭林; 樊霑

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG24092605

以公共交通为导向的发展模式(TOD)型社区步行环境感知评价及优化建议——以成都市为例

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24092605

陈岚^1,2,
许春敏¹,
陈春华^1,2, ,,
谭林¹,
樊霑³

1. 四川大学建筑与环境学院, 成都 610065;
2. 四川大学工程设计研究院有限公司, 成都 610065;
3. 崇州市规划和自然资源局, 四川崇州 611200

基金项目:

成都市哲学社会科学规划项目(2021BS099)。

详细信息

作者简介:
陈岚,博士,副教授,主要从事城市更新与空间规划工作。

通讯作者:
陈春华,cch3777@126.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 51
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-09-26
- 网络出版日期: 2025-10-24

Perception Evaluation and Optimization Strategies for the Walking Environment in TOD Communities: a Case Study of Chengdu

CHEN Lan^1,2,
XU Chunmin¹,
CHEN Chunhua^{1,2
, ,},
TAN Lin¹,
FAN Zhan³

1. College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China;
2. Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China;
3. Chongzhou Municipal Bureau of Planning and Natural Resources, Chongzhou 611200, China

摘要

摘要: 以公共交通为导向的发展模式(TOD)下的步行友好型社区建设对实现城市可持续发展具有重要意义。然而,现有城市侧重于TOD的高强度开发,对行人的步行感知体验关注不足。运用重要性-表现(IPA)分析法,从便捷性、多样性、美观性、恢复性和安全性5个维度构建TOD社区步行环境感知评价模型,选取成都市6个TOD社区为样本,从居民感知视角评价其步行体验。结果表明:成都市TOD社区步行环境中配套服务设施、休闲活动空间、路面平整度、步行路权等9项因子表现较差;同时,基于研究区的资源主导性,将TOD社区分为商业集聚型、公园网络型、教育聚集型三类,其中教育聚集型TOD社区居民对恢复性、多样性两方面的重视度较高,但满意度较低;商业集聚型TOD社区居民对恢复性与安全性满意度较低;公园网络型TOD社区步行环境便捷性未达到预期。最后,针对不同类型的TOD社区,从疗愈功能、慢行体系、步行安全等方面提出针对性的策略与措施。
- TOD社区 /
- 步行环境 /
- 行人感知评价 /
- IPA分析法
Abstract: The construction of walking-friendly communities under the Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) model is of great significance to the realization of sustainable urban development. However, many cities focus on the high-intensity development of TOD, paying insufficient attention to pedestrians’ walking perception experience. In this paper, the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method was used to construct a perception evaluation model of the walking environment in TOD communities, based on five dimensions: convenience, diversity, aesthetics, restorative quality, and safety. Six typical TOD communities in Chengdu were selected as samples to assess their walking experience from the perspective of residents’ perceptions. The results showed that 9 factors—including supporting service facilities, leisure activity space, pavement flatness, and pedestrian right-of-way—performed poorly in the walking environment of TOD communities in Chengdu. At the same time, based on the resource dominance of the study area, the TOD communities were divided into three categories: commercial agglomeration, park network, and educational agglomeration. Among these, residents of the educational agglomeration communities paid more attention to restoration and diversity but reported lower satisfaction. Residents of commercial agglomeration TOD communities were less satisfied with restoration and safety. Meanwhile, the walking environment convenience in park network TOD communities failed to meet expectations. Finally, for different types of TOD communities, targeted strategies and measures were proposed from the aspects of healing function, slow traffic system, and walking safety.
- TOD community /
- walking environment /
- pedestrian perception evaluation /
- IPA

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	刘泉. 轨道交通TOD地区的步行尺度[J]. 城市规划, 2019, 43(3): 88-95.
[2]	CERVERO R, OLGA L, SARMIENTO E J, et al. Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: lessons from Bogotá[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2009, 3(4): 203-226.
[3]	MONHEIM R. Pedestrian areas and pedestrian traffic in city centers[M]. Bonn: Ronner Geographical Treatises, 1980.
[4]	HSU K C, LIN S W, LEONGET Y Y, et al. Enhancing the pedestrian environment and walking willingness around Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) Stations in Asian Cities-an empirical study of Taipei[J]. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2024, 47: 489-513.
[5]	LU Y, GOU Z, XIAO Y, et al. Do transit-oriented developments (TODs) and established urban neighborhoods have similar walking levels in Hong Kong?[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(3), 555.
[6]	LAMOUR Q, MORELLI A M, MARINS K R, et al. Improving walkability in a Tod context: spatial strategies that enhance walking in the BelÉM Neighborhood, in São Paulo, Brazil[J]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2019, 7(2): 280-292.
[7]	SI Q, ANTHONY G Y. Understanding the effects of environmental perceptions on walking behavior by integrating big data with small data[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2023, 240, 104879.
[8]	陈泳, 严佳. 步行活动与轨道交通的共生: 德国老城步行化发展的公共交通策略[J]. 上海城市规划, 2017, 1(1): 1-8.
[9]	刘泉, 张莞莅, 钱征寒. 基于老龄化视角的TOD地区步行尺度: 以日本选址优化规划为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2021(2): 40-49.
[10]	肖锐琴. 香港空中步行系统精细化设计与启发[J]. 上海城市规划, 2021(1): 119-126.
[11]	张震宇, 刘泉, 赖亚妮, 等. 日本轨道站点地区的智慧TOD模式解读[J]. 南方建筑, 2022(12): 72-82.
[12]	张震宇, 李建智, 武虹园, 等. 韩国轨道站点TOD地区步行空间规划的经验与启示[J]. 规划师, 2022, 38(11): 138-146.
[13]	陈泳, 何宁. 轨道交通站地区宜步行环境及影响因素分析: 上海市12个生活住区的实证研究[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2012(6): 96-104.
[14]	徐伟星, 曾鹏, 刘蓓蓓, 等. 微观建成环境对地铁站域可步行性的影响研究: 以大连为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2024(5): 106-113.
[15]	费跃, 温旭丽, 刘云, 等. 建成环境对轨道站点早高峰步行接驳比例的影响研究[J]. 现代城市研究, 2024(3): 80-85.
[16]	郭杨, 胡希军. 城市居住与工业混合用地街区步行道的布置优化[J]. 工业建筑, 2023, 53(6): 66-74.
[17]	胡昂, 郭仲薇, 戴维维, 等. 基于差异层级大数据的地铁站域街道空间品质多维评价: 以成都市中心城区为例[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 52(5): 740-751.
[18]	柏巍. 快节奏·漫生活: 基于轨道站点的社区营造: 以宁波地铁1号线TOD社区设计为例[J]. 规划师, 2015, 31(10): 63-68.
[19]	郭巍, 侯晓蕾. TOD模式驱动下的城市步行空间设计策略[J]. 风景园林, 2015, 22(5): 100-104.
[20]	赵梦妮, 甄峰, 姜玉培. 城市社区步行环境综合评价及优化策略研究: 以南京主城区为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2021, 36(2): 41-48.
[21]	鲁斐栋, 谭少华. 城市住区适宜步行的物质空间形态要素研究: 基于重庆市南岸区16个住区的实证[J]. 规划师, 2019, 35(7): 69-76.
[22]	YAN Q, LUO S, JIANG J. Urban residents’ preferred walking street setting and environmental factors: the case of Chengdu City[J]. Buildings, 2023, 13(5), 1199.
[23]	张伊博, 卓晴, 王璨. 高密度城市步行适宜性研究: 以香港岛地铁站沿线区域为例[J]. 规划师, 2024, 40(增刊1): 109-116.
[24]	黄丽蒂, 刘双双, 郑博丹, 等. 面向老龄社会的社区建成环境可步行性测度研究[J]. 南方建筑, 2024(1): 107-114.
[25]	姜玉培, 甄峰, 张振龙. 面向人本治理的社区生活圈休闲步行与环境协调关系及影响因素研究: 以南京市为例[J]. 人文地理, 2023, 38(4): 62-71.
[26]	张雯洁, 潘海啸. 从“站城”一体到“站社”一体: 未来社区下的轨道TOD开发设计策略: 以宁波为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2024, 31(6): 73-80.
[27]	石健, 李凤会, 李芳, 等. TOD4. 0阶段交通枢纽地区景观设计策略: 以深汕综合交通枢纽地区为例[J]. 规划师, 2023, 39(11): 138-146.