坡面摩擦低预应力自复位混凝土框架结构的,抗震性能分析

孙小云; 黄林杰; 曾滨; 施政; 谢钦

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG24091003

坡面摩擦低预应力自复位混凝土框架结构的,抗震性能分析

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24091003

孙小云¹,
黄林杰^2, ,,
曾滨³,
施政²,
谢钦⁴

1. 南京交通职业技术学院, 南京 211188;
2. 南京林业大学土木工程学院, 南京 210037;
3. 中冶建筑研究总院有限公司, 北京 100088;
4. 贵州大学空间结构研究中心, 贵阳 550025

基金项目:

南京交通职业技术学院高层次人才科研启动经费项目(JG1804)

江苏省高校自然科学基金面上项目(22KJB560007)

国家自然科学重点基金项目(52038010)

国家自然科学基金项目(52208480,52108449)

南京交通职业技术学院院级重大科研项目(JZ2303)。

江苏省"青蓝工程"资助项目

详细信息

作者简介:
孙小云,博士,讲师,主要从事工程结构抗震研究。

通讯作者:
黄林杰,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,ljhuang@njfu.edu.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 37
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-09-10
- 网络出版日期: 2024-11-06

Analysis of Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Concrete Frame Structures Characterized by Low Prestressing and Slope Friction

1. Nanjing Vocational Institute of Transport Technology, Nanjing 211188, China;
2. College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
3. Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co., Ltd., MCC Group, Beijing 100088, China;
4. Research Center of Space Structures of Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China

摘要

摘要: 传统自复位混凝土框架的刚度和耗能能力不易满足结构的大震需求,使结构在地震过程中的层间位移角过大。且为满足结构的完全复位,须对预应力筋进行高张拉,进一步降低了结构的耗能比β。提出的坡面摩擦低预应力自复位混凝土(SF-SCPC)框架结构将低预应力和高耗能比β引入到自复位混凝土框架中,允许结构出现一定的残余位移,从而实现结构在罕遇地震下的高耗能。以某8度设防地区的钢筋混凝土结构为原型,分别设计了低预应力坡面摩擦半自复位混凝土(SF-PSCPC)框架、带平面摩擦耗能器的半自复位混凝土(PF-PSCPC)框架和带坡面摩擦耗能器的完全自复位混凝土(SF-CSCPC)框架。对结构进行设防烈度地震、罕遇地震和极罕遇地震下的非线性动力时程分析,研究了耗能器形式与初始预应力等参数对层间位移角、残余层间位移角和梁柱损伤等结构抗震性能指标的影响。结果表明:在预应力自复位混凝土框架中充分结合坡面摩擦耗能机制和低预应力复位机制可有效降低结构的层间位移角,减少主体构件的损伤;SF-PSCPC框架中的节点滞回曲线面积明显大于PF-PSCPC框架和SF-CSCPC框架,表现出较高的耗能能力;SF-PSCPC结构在罕遇地震下虽有一定的残余位移,但均小于结构经济可修的限值。
- 摩擦 /
- 自复位混凝土框架 /
- 耗能比 /
- 低预应力 /
- 抗震性能
Abstract: Due to the difficulty in meeting major earthquake demands with the stiffness and energy dissipation capabilities of traditional self-centering prestressed concrete (SCPC)frames, the inter-story drift of the structure becomes excessively large during seismic events. Additionally, to achieve full re-centering of the structure, high tensioning of steel strands is required, which further reduces the energy dissipation ratio (β) of the structure. A self-centering prestressed concrete frame with low prestressing and slope friction (SF-SCPC) was proposed, low prestressing and a high energy dissipation ratio β were incorporated into the self-centering prestressed concrete frame, allowing for some residual displacement in the structure to achieve high energy dissipation under large earthquakes. Using a reinforced concrete structure in an 8-degree seismic fortification area as a prototype, semi-self-centering prestressed concrete frames with low prestressing and slope friction (SF-PSCPC), semi-self-centering prestressed concrete (PF-PSCPC) frames with planar friction energy dissipating, and fully self-centering prestressed concrete frames with slope friction energy dissipating (SF-CSCPC) were designed. Nonlinear dynamic time-history analysis was conducted on the structures under design intensity, rarely occurred, and extremely rarely occurred earthquakes to study the impact of energy dissipator forms and initial prestressing parameters on the seismic performance indicators such as inter-story drift, residual inter-story drift, and beam-column damage. The results indicated that effectively combining the slope friction energy dissipation mechanism and low prestressing re-centering mechanism in self-centering prestressed concrete frames could significantly reduce the inter-story drift and decrease damage to main components. The hysteresis curve area of connections in the SF-PSCPC frame is significantly larger than that of the PF-PSCPC and SF-CSCPC frames, indicating higher energy dissipation capacity. Although the SF-PSCPC structure exhibited some residual displacement under rarely occurred earthquakes, it remained within the economically repairable limit of the structure.
- friction /
- self-centering prestressed concrete frames /
- energy dissipation ratio /
- low prestressing /
- seismic performance

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

[1]	吕西林,武大洋,周颖.可恢复功能防震结构研究进展[J].建筑结构学报,2019,40(2):1-15.
[2]	PAMPANIN S, PRIESTLEY M J N, SRITHATAN S.Analytical modeling of the seismic behavior of precast concrete frames designed with ductile connections[J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2001, 5(3): 329-367.
[3]	CHEOK G S,LEW H S. Performance of precast concrete beam-to-column connections subject to cyclic loading[J]. PCI Journal, 1991, 36(3): 56-67.
[4]	CHEOK G S,LEW H S.Model precast concrete beam-to-column connections subject to cyclic loading[J]. PCI Journal, 1993, 38(4): 80-92.
[5]	PRIESTLEY M J N,MACRAE G.Seismic tests of precast beam-to-column connection subassemblages with unbonded tendons[J].PCI Journal, 1996, 41(1): 64-81.
[6]	STONE W, CHEOK G,STANTON J.Performance of hybrid moment-resisting precast beam-column concrete connections subjected to cyclic loading[J].ACI Structural Journal, 1995, 92(2):229-249.
[7]	LI Y, GENG F, DING Y, et al. Experimental and numerical study of low-damage self-centering precast concrete frame connections with replaceable dampers[J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 220,111011.
[8]	PAMPANIN S, AMARIS A. Critical aspects in modelling the seismic behavior of precast/prestressed concrete building connections and systems[C]//Proceedings of the First FIB Congress. Naples, Italy:2002.
[9]	WANG C L, LIU Y, ZHENG X, et al. Experimental investigation of a precast concrete connection with all-steel bamboo-shaped energy dissipaters[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 178: 298-308.
[10]	钱辉,裴金召,李宗翱,等.基于SMA/ECC的新型自复位框架节点抗震性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报, 2020, 53(11): 64-73.
[11]	LU X L, CUI Y, LIU J, et al. Shaking table test and numerical simulation of a 1/2-scale self-centering reinforced concrete frame[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2015, 44(12): 1899-1917.
[12]	HUANG L J,WEN H W, JIANG K X, et al, Seismic performance of partial self-centering prestressed concrete frames with friction dampers[J]. Sructures, 2024,62,106268.
[13]	HUANG L J, ZHOU Z, HUANG X G, et al. Variable friction damped self-centering precast concrete beam-column connections with hidden corbels: experimental investigation and theoretical analysis[J]. Engineering Structures. 2020, 206, 110150.
[14]	PERNA C.FEMA P-58-1, Seismic performance assessment of buildings: Volume 1-Methodology [R]. Washington, D.C: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2012.
[15]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
[16]	孙小云,韩建平,黄林杰. 基于不同规范设计的现役RC框架损伤分析及可修复性能评估 [J]. 工程力学, 2023, 40(3):117-128.