中空圆铝管混凝土短柱轴压承载性能研究

王磊; 吴毅辉; 姜梦瑶; 舒前进

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG24050615

中空圆铝管混凝土短柱轴压承载性能研究

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24050615

1. 山东省临沂市园林环卫保障服务中心, 山东临沂 276000;
2. 中国矿业大学, 江苏徐州 221116

详细信息

作者简介:
王磊,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事城市更新、绿色建材和固废处理的研究,wanglei_780539@163.com。

通讯作者:
舒前进,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事铝合金结构的研究,shu-qianjin@cumt.edu.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 61
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 1
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-05-06
- 网络出版日期: 2024-10-18

Research on the Bearing Capacity of Concrete-Filled Double-Skin Circular Aluminum Tube Short Columns Under Axial Compression

1. Linyi Landscape Environmental Sanitation Service Center, Linyi 276000, China;
2. China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

摘要

摘要: 以内PVC管外铝合金管的中空圆铝管混凝土短柱为研究对象,考虑聚氯乙烯(PVC)管直径和铝管壁厚两个因素,对中空圆铝管混凝土短柱进行了轴压试验研究和相应的有限元模拟分析,获得了中空圆铝管混凝土短柱试件的破坏形态、极限承载力、荷载-铝管应变关系,对比分析了现有钢管混凝土轴压短柱承载力计算方法预测中空圆铝管混凝土短柱承载力的可行性。研究结果表明:中空圆铝管混凝土短柱的破坏形态表现为鼓曲型破坏;当PVC管直径不变时,随着铝管壁厚的增加,试件极限承载力提高幅度达到46.6%~96.6%;当铝管厚度不变时,随着PVC管直径的增大,试件承载力下降了8.3%~28.4%。现有的关于钢管混凝土(CFST)柱承载力的欧洲EC4规范和美国AISC规范的预测结果的准确性受到铝管壁厚的影响,且过于保守;我国CCES规范针对不同壁厚试件的预测数据稳定性存在不足;学者陶忠所提出方法的预测结果的接近程度和数据稳定性相对最好。最终提出了关于中空圆铝管混凝土短柱轴压承载力计算的建议。
- 铝管混凝土柱 /
- PVC管 /
- 圆铝管 /
- 轴压 /
- 承载性能
Abstract: Concrete-filled double-skin circular aluminum tube short columns consisting of PVC tube inside and aluminum alloy tube outside was taken as the research object, considering two variables of PVC tube diameter and aluminum tube wall thickness, axial compression test research and corresponding finite element simulation analysis on the concrete-filled double-skin circular aluminum tube short columns were carried out. The failure modes, ultimate bearing capacities and load-strain relation of the concrete-filled double-skin circular aluminum tube short column specimens were obtained. The feasibility of using existing calculation methods for the bearing capacity of steel tube concrete short columns under axial compression to predict the bearing capacity of concrete-filled double-skin circular aluminum tube short columns were compared and analyzed. The research results indicated that the failure mode of concrete-filled double-skin circular aluminum tube short columns exhibited bulging failure. When the diameter of the PVC tube remained constant, the ultimate bearing capacity of the specimen increased by 46.6%-96.6% with the increase of the wall thickness of the aluminum tube. When the thickness of the aluminum tube remained unchanged, the bearing capacity of the specimen decreased by 8.3%-28.4% with the increase of the diameter of the PVC tube. The accuracy of the projected results of the existing European EC 4 code and the United States AISC code for CFST column bearing capacity was affected by the wall thickness of the aluminum tube and the result were too conservative. The predicted data stability of CCES standard for specimens with different wall thicknesses was insufficient. The method proposed by scholar Tao Zhong showed the best predicted results and data stability.Finally, a suggestion was put forward for the calculation of the bearing capacity of concrete-filled double-skin circular aluminum tube short columns under axial compression.
- concrete-filled aluminum tube /
- PVC tube /
- circular aluminum tube /
- axial compression /
- bearing capacity

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	钟善桐. 钢管混凝土结构 [M].3版. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2003.
[2]	HUANG H, HAN L H,ZHONG T, et al. Analytical behavior of concrete-filled double skin steel tubular (CFDST) stub columns [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(4): 542-555.
[3]	JING Y, CHEN Y, HAN L H. Research on bearing capacity of short concrete filled double skin steel tubes columns under axial compression [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 1068 (338):2154-2157.
[4]	HASSANEIN M F, KHAROOB O F. Compressive strength of circular concrete-filled double skin tubular short columns [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2014, 77(4): 165-173.
[5]	UENAKA K, HAYAMI M, KITOH H et al. Experimental study on concrete double tubular steel columns under axial loading[J]. Advances in Structure, 2003, 15(5): 877-882.
[6]	UENAKA K, KITOH H, SONODA K. Concrete filled double skin circular stub columns under compression[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2009, 47(1):19-24.
[7]	ZHAO X L, GRZEBIETA R. Strength and ductility of concrete filled double skin (SHS inner and SHS outer) tubes [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2002, 40(2): 199-213.
[8]	陶忠, 韩林海,黄宏.方中空夹层钢管混凝土偏心受压柱力学性能的研究[J].土木工程学报, 2003,36 (2): 33-40 ,51.
[9]	陶忠, 韩林海,黄宏. 圆中空夹层CFST柱力学性能研究[J].土木工程学报, 2004, 37(10): 41-51.
[10]	YUAN W, YANG J. Experimental and numerical studies of short concrete-filled double skin composite tube columns under axially compressive loads[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 80: 23-31.
[11]	杨俊杰, 戚晓锴.八边形中空夹层CFST柱PVC-U内管的性能研究[J]. 浙江工业大学学报, 2013, 41(6):672-676.
[12]	黄宏,朱彦奇,郭晓宇,等. 塑料内管的方中空夹层CFST柱轴压性能研究 [J]. 应用力学学报, 2017, 34(1): 88-94 ,198.
[13]	韩林海. 钢管混凝土结构: 理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社, 2007.
[14]	曾翔, 吴晚博, 霍静思, 等. 圆铝合金管混凝土短柱轴心受压承载力研究 [J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(2): 52-60.
[15]	ZHOU F, YOUNG B. Concrete-filled aluminum circular hollow section column tests [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2009, 47(11): 1272-1280.
[16]	WANG F C, ZHAO H Y, HAN L H. Analytical behavior of concrete-filled aluminum tubular stub columns under axial compression [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019, 140: 21-30.
[17]	PATEL V I, LIANG Q Q, HADI M N S. Numerical simulations of circular high strength concrete-filled aluminum tubular short columns incorporating new concrete confinement model [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 147,106492.
[18]	MOON J, KIM J J, LEE T H, et al. Prediction of axial load capacity of stub circular concrete-filled steel tube using fuzzy logic [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014,101: 184-191.
[19]	查晓雄, 宫永丽. 新型金属管混凝土柱力学性能研究I: 轴压短柱强度承载力的研究[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2012,14 (3): 12-18 , 35.
[20]	JIANG M Y, SHU Q J, LIU P X, et al. Testing and numerical simulation of concrete-filled 6061-T6 aluminum tubular stub columns[J]. Structures, 2024, 60,105855.
[21]	QI X M, SHU Q J,WANG F Y, et al. Experimental study on eccentric compressive behaviors of 6061-T6 aluminum tubular long columns filled with concrete[J/OL]. Engineering Structures, 2024, 299[2023-12-16].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117040.
[22]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.钢管混凝土结构技术规范:GB 50936—2014[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014.
[23]	全国标准化技术委员会. 金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228.1—2021[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
[24]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土物理力学性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50081—2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
[25]	中国土木工程学会.中空夹层钢管混凝土结构技术规程:T/CCES 7—2020[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2020.
[26]	American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC).Specification for structural steel buildings: ANSI／AISC 360-05 [S].Chicago:AISC,2005.
[27]	European Committee for Standardization.Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structure, part 1.1: general rules fire design and rules for building[S]. Brussels:European Committee for Standardization, 2005.