Research on Seismic Performance of Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tubular Columns with CFRP Profiles
-
摘要: 为研究碳纤维增强复合材料(CFRP)-方钢管混凝土柱的抗震性能,进行了3根CFRP-方钢管混凝土柱的低周往复荷载试验,以含钢率为变化参数阐述了其加载过程及破坏模式。应用ABAQUS有限元分析软件,在合理选用材料本构关系的基础上,建立数值分析模型,并通过与试验结果进行对比,验证了所建模型及其建模方法的准确性。通过建立大量精细化的数值模型,考虑了不同钢材屈服强度、混凝土抗压强度、含钢率、长细比以及是否内置CFRP型材等参数,研究其对组合柱荷载-位移滞回曲线、荷载-位移骨架曲线、刚度、承载力等性能指标的影响规律。结果表明:新型组合柱的滞回曲线比较饱满,没有出现明显的捏缩现象,表现出良好的抗震性能;与普通方钢管混凝土柱相比,新型组合柱具有较好的延性、承载能力和耗能能力;混凝土抗压强度的改变对组合柱的极限承载力影响较小,其极限承载力会随着钢材屈服强度与含钢率的增大而显著提高,方钢管壁厚每增加1 mm,其极限承载力依次提高14.3%、8.3%,其耗能值依次提高14.3%、10.7%;当长细比由32.33增长至50.81时,其极限承载力与耗能值分别降低了41.2%、60.8%,因此建议应合理控制长细比的取值。Abstract: In order to investigate the seismic performance of concrete-filled square steel tubular columns with CFRP(C-CFST), three columns with CFRP were tested under quasi-static load with steel ratio as the parameter. The changing parameter of the composite columns is steel ratio. The loading process and failure modes of the composite columns were described. ABAQUS finite element analysis software was used to establish a numerical analysis model on the basis of rational selection of material constitutive relations. Compared with the experimental results, the accuracy of the model and its modeling method were verified. By establishing a large number of refined numerical models, considering different parameters such as yield strength of steels, compressive strength of concrete, steel ratio, slenderness ratio, and whether I-shaped CFRP profiles are built in, the influence of these parameters on the load-displacement hysteretic curve, load-displacement skeleton curve, stiffness, bearing capacity and other performance indicators of composite columns was studied. The results showed that the hysteretic curve of the new composite column was relatively full, there was no obvious pinch phenomenon, and it showed a good seismic performance; compared with ordinary CFST tubular columns, the new composite columns had better ductility, bearing capacity and energy dissipation capacity; the change of concrete compressive strength had little effect on the ultimate bearing capacity of composite columns, and the ultimate bearing capacity would increase significantly with the increase of steel yield strength and steel ratio; when the wall thickness of square steel pipe increased by 1 mm, the ultimate bearing capacity increased by 14.3%, 8.3%, and the energy dissipation value increased by 14.3%, 10.7%; when the slenderness ratio increased from 32.33 to 50.81, the ultimate bearing capacity and energy dissipation decreased by 41.2% and 60.8%, respectively. Therefore, it is suggested that the slenderness ratio should be reasonably controlled.
-
[1] 韩林海. 钢管混凝土结构[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2007. [2] PARK J W, HONG Y K, HONG G S. Design formulas of concrete filled circular steel tubes reinforced by carbon fiber reinforced plastic sheets[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 14: 2916-2922. [3] 李双蓓,潘星年,陈宇良,等. GFRP管约束钢管混凝土加劲混合柱轴压力学性能试验研究[J]. 混凝土, 2022(5): 31-36. [4] 王志滨,陶忠. FRP-混凝土-钢管组合受弯构件力学性能试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2009, 39(4): 5-8, 27. [5] 李帼昌,张春雨,于洪平. 内置CFRP圆管的方钢管高强混凝土结构研究进展[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(增刊2): 57-68. [6] YAMAZAKI S, SUSUMU M. Experimental study on inelastic behavior of steel beam-columns subject to varying axial force and cyclic lateral load [J]. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), 1999, 64(519): 95-102. [7] YOSHIAKI G, KUMAR G P, KAWANISHI N. Nonlinear finite-element analysis for hysteretic behavior of thin-walled circular steel columns with in-filled concrete[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2010, 136(11): 1413-1422. [8] 韩林海,游经团,杨有福,等. 往复荷载作用下矩形钢管混凝土构件力学性能的研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2004(11): 11-22. [9] 王志滨,吴扬杭,王巧艺,等. 带直角六边形钢管混凝土柱的滞回性能研究[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2021, 23(9): 19-24. [10] FANG C, ZHOU F, WU Z Y, et al. Concrete-filled elliptical hollow section beam-columns under seismic loading[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2020, 146(8),4020144. [11] 王庆利,牛献军,冯立明. 圆CFRP-钢管混凝土压弯构件滞回性能的参数分析与恢复力模型[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(增刊1): 159-166. [12] PARK J W, HONG Y K, CHOI S M. Behaviors of concrete filled square steel tubes confined by carbon fiber sheets (CFS) under compression and cyclic loads[J]. Steel & Composite Structures, 2010, 10(2): 187-205. [13] CHEN Z H, DONG S S, DU Y S. Experimental study and numerical analysis on seismic performance of FRP confined high-strength rectangular concrete-filled steel tube columns[J]. Thin-Walled structures, 2021, 162(5), 107560. [14] FENG P, CHENG S, YU T. Seismic performance of hybrid columns of concrete-filled square steel tube with frp-confined concrete core[J/OL]. Journal of composites for construction, 2018, 22(4)[2024-01-30]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000849. [15] 李帼昌,朱振华,孙行.内置工字形CFRP型材的方钢管混凝土轴压长柱受力性能研究[J].建筑结构学报,2017,38(增刊1):226-232. [16] LI G C, ZHANG R R, YANG Z J, et al. Finite element analysis on mechanical performance of middle long cfst column with inner I-shaped CFRP profile under axial loading[J]. Structures, 2017, 9: 63-69. [17] 李帼昌,于潇,李晓. 偏心率对工字型CFRP-高强圆钢管高强混凝土短柱力学性能的影响[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 39(4): 577-586. [18] LI G C, SUN X, YANG Z J, et al. Buckling behavior of slender square concrete filled steel tubular columns strengthened with CFRP profile under combined compression and bending[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 53,104563. [19] LI G C, ZHANG M G, FANG C, et al. Numerical investigations on flexural behavior of I-shaped CFRP-encased high-strength square concrete filled steel tubes[J]. Structures, 2023, 48: 681-693. [20] 刘旭,李帼昌,李晓.内置工字形CFRP型材的圆钢管混凝土柱抗侧向冲击性能研究[J].钢结构(中英文),2023,38(7):12-21. [21] HAN L H, YAO G H, TAO Z. Performance of concrete-filled thin-walled steel tubes under pure torsion[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2007, 45(1): 24-36. [22] TSAI S W, WU E M. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 1971, 5(1): 58-80. [23] 王玉镯,傅传国. ABAQUS结构工程分析及实例详解[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. [24] 王文达,陈亚明,纪孙航,等. 双钢管混凝土构件滞回性能试验与分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2024, 45(1): 128-138. [25] 闫煦,周博. 方CFRP-钢管混凝土(S-CFRP-CFST)压弯构件滞回性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(增刊1): 236-240. [26] 袁辉辉,程军,吴庆雄,等.钢管混凝土混合柱抗震性能试验研究[J/OL].工程力学,2024 [2024-06-07]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2595.O3.20230423.1821.012.html.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 41
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0