Analysis of Shock Wave Propagation Rules and Structural Damage in Blast Resistant Chamber Under Large Explosive Loads
-
摘要: 通过LS-DYNA有限元模拟软件对抗爆间室在超过100 kg TNT当量爆炸下的冲击波传播规律和结构损伤进行了研究。分析了水平和竖直截面的空气压力分布及超压峰值变化,探讨了冲击波的传播规律,并研究了不同参数对抗爆间室破坏模式的影响。提出基于支座转角的三个损伤指标:λ(顶盖弯曲弦长与顶盖长度之比)、η(墙板脱落面积与表面积之比)、μ(顶盖弯曲曲率半径与半跨之比)评估损伤程度。结果表明:后墙区域峰值超压远大于泄爆面区域;增加墙板厚度和混凝土强度可将破坏模式由剪切破坏转为弯曲破坏,配筋率和钢筋屈服强度对破坏模式影响不大,但可增强抗剪和抗弯能力。设计建议包括墙板厚度不小于300 mm,混凝土强度为C30~C40,钢筋屈服强度为235~400 MPa。根据损伤结果,抗爆间室内的试验台位置应满足"位于抗爆间室泄爆面与中间面之间的区域"这一构造要求。Abstract: Through LS-DYNA finite element simulation software, the shock wave propagation law and structural damage of the blast-resistant chamber subjected to the explosions exceeding 100 kg TNT equivalent were studied. The air pressure distribution and peak overpressure variation across horizontal and vertical sections were analyzed, the propagation law of shock wave was discussed, and the influence of different parameters on the failure mode of blast-resistant chamber was studied. Three damage indexes based on the bearing angle were proposed: λ (the ratio of the upward bending chord length to the top cover length), η (the ratio of the spalling area of the wall panel to the surface area), μ (the ratio of the bending radius of the top cover to the half span) to evaluate the damage degree. The results showed that the peak overpressure near the rear wall area was significantly higher than that of the explosion venting surface. Increasing the thickness of wallboard and concrete strength could change the failure mode from shear failure to flexural failure, while variations in reinforcement ratio and steel yield strength had minimal impact on the failure mode but enhance shear and flexural capacity. Design recommendations include a minimum wall thickness of 300 mm, concrete strength ranging from C30 to C40, and steel yield strength between 235 MPa and 400 MPa. Based on the damage results, the location of the test stand within the chamber should meet the structural requirement of being positioned between the venting surface and the mid-plane of the chamber.
-
[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.抗爆间室结构设计规范:GB 50907—2013[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2013. [2] 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部.石油化工控制室抗爆设计规范:SH/T 3160—2009[S].北京:中国石化出版社,2010. [3] SMITH P D,MAYS G C,ROSE T A,et al. Small scale models of complex geometry for blast overpressure assessmen[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1992,12(3): 345-360. [4] 杨科之, 杨秀敏, 邓国强, 等. 封闭结构的内爆炸试验[C]//第二届全国爆炸力学实验技术交流会. 2002: 242-247. [5] 杨科之, 杨秀敏, 董军, 等. 抗内爆炸结构的等效荷载设计法[C]//第十二届全国结构工程学术会议. 2003: 606-613. [6] 高轩能, 王书鹏, 江媛. 爆炸荷载下大空间结构的冲击波压力场分布及泄爆措施研究[J]. 工程力学, 2010, 27(4): 226-233. [7] XU W Z, WU W, LIN Y S. Numerical method and simplified analytical model for predicting the blast load in a partially confined chamber[J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2018, 76(2): 284-314. [8] 李忠献, 师燕超, 史祥生. 爆炸荷载作用下钢筋混凝土板破坏评定方法[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2009, 30(6): 60-66. [9] 汪明. 爆炸荷载作用下钢结构损伤机理及砌体墙破碎过程研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2010. [10] COLOMBO M, MARTINELLI P, HUAPING R. Pressure-impulse diagrams for SFRC underground tunnels [C]//Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures. London: Taylor & Francis Group,2014. [11] Technical Manual (TM5-1300). To resist the effect of accidental explosions[M]. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of the Army, Navy and the Air force, 1990. [12] 李翼祺, 马素贞. 爆炸力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992. [13] 李天华, 赵均海, 魏雪英, 等. 爆炸荷载下钢筋混凝土板的动力响应及参数分析[J]. 建筑结构, 2012, 42 (增刊1): 786-790. [14] NICKERSON J, TRASBORG P, NAITO C, et al. Finite element assessment of methods for incorporating axial load effects into blast design SDOF analyses of precast wall panels[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2015,29(5): 106-112. [15] 兰涛, 郭昌灵, 门进杰, 等. 箱板装配式钢结构住宅振动台模型试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2018, 48 (9): 1-8. [16] 兰涛, 赵廷涛, 刘贵, 等. 箱板式钢结构住宅底部加强区的单片组合墙体有限元分析[J]. 钢结构, 2017, 32 (11): 84-90,46.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 71
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0