Industrial Superstructure Safety Risk Assessment Based on the Theoretical Framework of “Risk Source-Risk Exposure-Mitigation Force”
-
摘要: 工业上楼是一种新型产业空间模式,实现了城市产业空间的高效利用,也给产业园区带来了新的安全风险因素。为科学精准评估工业上楼安全风险,基于"风险源-承载体-减灾力"理论框架,提出由风险源控制、承灾体韧性、减灾力3个准则层和20个二级指标构成的工业上楼安全风险评估指标体系。同时,结合网络分析法(ANP)和物元可拓模型确定指标权重体系和评价方法,建立工业上楼安全风险评估模型,将工业上楼安全风险评估数据实现可拓量化,进而提升评估结果的客观性。以深圳某工业上楼园区为实例进行分析,结果表明该工业上楼园区安全风险等级为轻度风险,评估结果较好,符合实际情况;通过对比发现,提出的评估方法具有实用性、科学性;该园区应重点关注承灾体韧性水平建设,加强少量危化品管理,合理管控生产性振动等风险,加强风险监测预警能力建设,以更好地保障工业上楼安全。Abstract: Industrial superstructures are a new type of industrial space model, which realizes the efficient use of urban industrial space and also brings new safety risk factors to industrial parks. In order to scientifically and accurately assess the safety risks of industrial buildings, the paper proposed a safety risk assessment index system for industrial buildings based on the theoretical framework of "risk source-risk exposure-mitigation force", which consists of three guideline layers of risk source control, carrier toughness, and mitigation force, as well as 20 secondary indicators. At the same time, combining the network analysis method (ANP) and the object-element topology model to determine the indicator weighting system and evaluation method, the establishment of industrial superstructure safety risk assessment model, the industrial superstructure safety risk assessment data to realize topology quantification, and then enhance the objectivity of the assessment results. The paper took an industrial superstructure park in Shenzhen as an example, and the analysis results showed that the safety risk level of the industrial superstructure park was light risk, and the assessment results were better, which was in line with the actual situation; through a comparison, it was found that the assessment method proposed in the paper was practical and scientific; the park should focus on the construction of the resilience level of the disaster-bearing body, strengthen a small amount of hazardous chemicals management, reasonably control the risks of productive vibration, etc., and strengthen the capacity of risk monitoring and early-warning, in order to better guarantee the safety of industrial superstructures.
-
[1] 宋迎迎,张绪霞,赵子健."工业上楼"撑起发展新高度[N].科技日报,2023-11-29(3). [2] 吕绍刚.深圳探索"工业上楼"[N].人民日报,2023-08-14(2). [3] 刘素霞,程瑶,梅强,等.工业园区企业安全生产达标策略选择演化研究:基于溢出效应视角[J].系统工程理论与实践,2020,40(12):3284-3297. [4] 李艳萍,乔琦,柴发合,等.基于层次分析法的工业园区环境风险评价指标权重分析[J].环境科学研究,2014,27(3):334-340. [5] 张以飞,付丽洋,毕军,等.江苏工业园区突发环境事件风险评估体系研究[J].环境污染与防治,2020,42(11):1430-1435. [6] 张道斌.化工园区企业安全风险分级和预警方法[J].现代化工,2022,42(S2):12-15. [7] 王征.海南省洋浦经济开发区化工园区安全管理探析[J].消防科学与技术,2021,40(12):1832-1836. [8] 夏庆,申瑞婷.大型石化港区安全风险评估指标体系与评估方法[J].水运工程,2020(10):95-98. [9] 辛春林,张姗姗.化工园区定量风险评价方法及相关理论研究综述[J].应用化工,2018,47(5):1003-1006+1010. [10] 刘丹,孙晓云,王喆,等.基于熵权-云模型的精细化工园区脆弱性评价[J].安全与环境学报,2023,23(1):1-7. [11] 杨国梁,魏利军,多英全,等.化工园区安全韧性内涵及量化理论模型研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(7):5-10. [12] 刘大山,陈晓春,多英全,等.化工园区地震Na-Tech事件快速风险评估方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2021,31(2):127-134. [13] 陈大川,彭文开.基于改进模糊层次分析法的化工园区建筑物结构抗爆安全性能风险评估[J].安全与环境工程,2021,28(6):52-60+66. [14] 岳清瑞,施钟淇,崔文惠,等.基于"风险源-承灾体-减灾力"的"防-诊-治-应"城市安全技术体系[J].工业建筑,2023,53(9):1-9. [15] 岳清瑞,陆新征,许镇,等.城市安全"风险源-承灾体-减灾力"理论框架[J/OL].工程力学:1-9[2023-12-10].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2595.o3.20230907.1432.006.html. [16] 王莲芬.网络分析法(ANP)的理论与算法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001(3):44-50. [17] 辛晶,杨玉胜.基于网络层次分析法的石油化工设施安全风险评估[J].灾害学,2021,36(2):151-154. [18] 樊燕燕,王瑞.物元可拓法在地铁盾构施工安全风险评估中的应用[J].安全与环境学报,2023,23(6):1779-1790. [19] 成连华,魏凯,曹东强.基于模糊贝叶斯网络的高层建筑火灾风险评估方法[J].科学技术与工程,2023,23(13):5707-5714. [20] 师立晨.化工园区安全发展存在的问题及对策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(S1):128-134.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 190
- HTML全文浏览量: 10
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 0