钢结构阀厅与设备耦联效应对换流站800 kV穿墙套管地震响应影响研究

杨大峰; 孙松; 陈峰; 林康立; 舒前进; 曹聪

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG23112115

钢结构阀厅与设备耦联效应对换流站800 kV穿墙套管地震响应影响研究

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23112115

杨大峰¹,
孙松¹,
陈峰¹,
林康立¹,
舒前进^2, ,,
曹聪²

1. 国网江苏电力设计咨询有限公司徐州勘测设计分公司, 江苏徐州, 221000;
2. 中国矿业大学, 江苏徐州, 221116

基金项目:

国网江苏电力设计咨询有限公司科技项目（JE202212）。

详细信息

作者简介:
杨大峰，工程师，主要从事变电工程结构设计方面研究。

通讯作者:
舒前进，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，主要从事输电线路工程减灾防灾理论和技术方面研究，shu-qianjin@cumt.edu.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 44
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-11-21
- 网络出版日期: 2024-05-29

Research on the Influence of Coupling Effect Between Steel Valve Hall Structure and Equipment on the Seismic Response of 800 kV Wall Bushing

1. Xuzhou Survey and Design Branch of State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Design Consulting Co., Ltd., Xuzhou 221000, china;
2. China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, china

摘要

摘要: 以典型特高压阀厅800 kV穿墙套管为研究对象，建立了考虑800 kV套管与钢结构阀厅、阀塔、400kV穿墙套管及防火墙的不同耦联方式的7种有限元模型，研究了穿墙套管及其端板的地震响应规律。研究结果表明：考虑与钢结构阀厅、防火墙及400 kV穿墙套管的耦联作用后，800 kV穿墙套管的端板应力幅值增大了21.7%~26.6%，而横向加速度幅值提高了20.5%~31.1%；外套管的应力幅值相对更大，约为内套管的1.06~1.17倍；阀厅结构与设备的耦联作用，使内套管的应力幅值提高了10.3%~11.9%，而对外套管应力没有明显影响（最大仅相差0.62%）；结构设备耦联作用使得导电杆与套管内壁的相对位移明显增大，使横向相对位移提高了20.6%~63.4%，而纵向相对位移提高了38.5%~42.8%。因此，在穿墙套管设计选型及强度校核时，应全面考虑钢结构阀厅与设备耦联效应的不利影响。
- 换流站 /
- 阀厅 /
- 穿墙套管 /
- 抗震性能 /
- 耦联作用 /
- 地震响应
Abstract: Taking the 800 kV wall bushing of a typical ultra-high voltage valve hall as the research object, seven finite element models were established considering different coupling modes between the 800 kV bushing and the steel structure valve hall, valve tower, 400 kV wall bushing, and firewall. The seismic response laws of the wall bushing and its end plates were studied. The research results showed that the stress amplitude of end plates of the 800 kV wall bushing increaseed by 21.7% to 26.6%, while the lateral acceleration amplitude increased by 20.5% to 31.1%, after considering the coupling effect with the steel structure valve hall, firewall, and 400 kV wall bushing. The stress amplitude of the outer casing pipe was relatively larger, approximately 1.06-1.17 times that of the inner casing pipe. The coupling effect between the valve hall structure and the equipment had increased the stress amplitude of the inner casing pipe by 10.3-11.9%, while there was no significant impact on the stress of the outer casing pipe (with a maximum difference of only 0.62%). The coupling effect of structural equipment significantly increased the relative displacement between the conductive rod and the inner wall of the casing pipe, increasing the lateral relative displacement by 20.6-63.4% and the longitudinal relative displacement by 38.5-42.8%. Therefore, in the design, selection, and strength verification of wall bushings, the adverse effects of the coupling effect between the steel structure valve hall and the equipment should be comprehensively considered in order to obtain more scientific and accurate conclusions.
- converter station /
- valve hall /
- wall bushing /
- seismic performance /
- coupling effect /
- seismic response

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	谢强,李杰.电力系统自然灾害的现状与对策[J].自然灾害学报, 2006(4):126-131.
[2]	于永清,李光范,李鹏,等.四川电网汶川地震电力设施受灾调研分析[J].电网技术, 2008(11):5-10.
[3]	王晓游,谢强,罗兵,等.±800 kV穿墙套管的地震响应与振动控制[J].高压电器, 2018, 54(1):16-22.
[4]	VILLAVERDE R, PARDOEN G C, CARNALLA S. Ground motion amplification at flange level of bushings mounted on electric substation transformers[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2001, 30(5):621-632.
[5]	唐云,朱旺,薛志航,等.±1200 kV特高压直流穿墙套管抗震性能分析[J].高压电器, 2022, 58(8):41-49.
[6]	HE C, XIE Q, YANG ZY, et al. Seismic performance evaluation and improvement of ultra-high voltage wall bushing-valve hall system[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 154:123-133.
[7]	XIE Q, LIANG H B, WANG X Y. Seismic performance improvement of±800 kV UHV DC wall busing using friction ring spring dampers[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2021, 37(2):1056-1077.
[8]	XIE Q, HE C, ZHOU Y. Seismic evaluation of ultra-high voltage wall bushing[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2019, 35(2):611-633.
[9]	罗兵,饶宏,卓然,等.±800 kV滇西北特高压直流工程穿墙套管抗震性能研究[J].南方电网技术, 2017, 11(12):1-8.
[10]	PAOLACCI F, GIANNINI R. Seismic reliability assessment of a high-voltage disconnect switch using an effective fragility analysis[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 13(2):217-235.
[11]	ZAREEI S A, HOSSEINI M, GHAFORY-ASHTIANY M. Evaluation of power substation equipment seismic vulnerability by multivariate fragility analysis:a case study on a 420 kV circuit breaker[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 92:79-94.
[12]	ZAREEI S A, HOSSEINI M, GHAFORY-ASHTIANY M. Seismic failure probability of a 400 kV power transformer using analytical fragility curves[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, 70:273-289.
[13]	梁黄彬,谢强,何畅,等.±800 kV特高压直流穿墙套管的地震易损性分析[J].地震工程与工程振动, 2020, 40(2):91-100.
[14]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.电力设施抗震设计规范:GB 50260-2013[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2013.
[15]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GBJ 50011-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.