基于统一强度准则的桩侧卸荷缩孔弹塑性解析解

杜桃明; 宋松科; 刘伟; 权新蕊; 孔德彪

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG23092004

基于统一强度准则的桩侧卸荷缩孔弹塑性解析解

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23092004

1 四川省交通勘察设计研究院有限公司, 成都 610017;
2. 云南省建筑科学研究院有限公司, 昆明 650223

详细信息

作者简介:
杜桃明,硕士,正高级工程师,主要从事大跨度桥梁与组合结构桥梁的设计咨询,327844907@qq.com。

通讯作者:
宋松科，硕士，主要从事大跨度桥梁与组合结构桥梁的设计咨询，54881770@qq.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 36
- HTML全文浏览量: 6
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-09-20
- 网络出版日期: 2024-08-16

Elastoplastic Analytical Solutions for Borehole Contraction of Bored Piles by Boring Unloading Based on Unified Strength Theory

1. Sichuan Communication Surveying & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610017, China;
2. Yunnan Institute Building Research Co., Ltd., Kunming 650223, China

摘要

摘要: 为对灌注桩卸荷缩孔过程进行定量预测,采用统一强度屈服准则并结合非相关联流动法则,推导了桩侧卸荷缩孔大应变和小应变弹塑性解析解,并分析土体中主应力系数、土体剪胀角、土性参数等对桩侧卸荷缩孔解析值的影响,结果表明:中主应力系数b、土体内摩擦角φ值越大,土体剪胀角ψ值越小,越有利于灌注桩孔壁稳定性; 采用Mohr-Coulomb屈服准则以及当孔壁土体进入塑性状态后采用小应变解所得结果均偏向于保守; 中主应力系数b越大,对应的圆柱孔孔壁沿径向同一位置处的径向应力和孔壁最大环向应力值越大,而同一位置处的孔周位移越小; 孔壁最大环向应力出现位置随着b值的增大而逐渐靠近圆柱孔孔壁,而孔壁最大环向应力增长幅度随着b值的增大而减小; 采用大应变解和小应变解分析圆柱孔卸荷缩孔孔周应力场和位移场分布规律皆可满足要求。研究成果可应用于灌注桩成孔开挖过程中孔壁土体稳定性以及灌注桩承载特性的定量分析。
- 灌注桩 /
- 中间主应力 /
- 统一强度准则 /
- 卸荷 /
- 解析解
Abstract: To quantitatively predict the process of unloading for bored piles, combining the unified strength theory (UST) with the non-associated flow rule, the elastoplastic analytical solutions of large strain and small strain for borehole contraction of bored piles were derived. And the influence of intermediate principal stress, dilatancy angle and parameters of piles on analytical values in the borehole contraction process were analyzed. The result indicated that the larger the coefficients of intermediate principal stress b and the internal friction angle of soil φ were, the smaller the dilatancy angle ψ of soil was, and the better the stability of borehole walls of bored piles was. The solutions based on the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion and the small strain theory in a plastic state of borehole wall soil were both conservative. The larger the coefficient of intermediate principal stress b was, the larger the radial stress and the maximum circumferential stress at the same position of cylindrical borehole wall were, and the smaller the radial displacement at the same position was. With the increase in the coefficients of intermediate principal stress b, the maximum circumferential stress gradually approached the borehole wall, simultaneously, the increment of the maximum circumferential stress decreased with the increase in the coefficient of intermediate principal stress b. Both solutions for soil stress and displacement fields around the cylindrical borehole in the process of borehole contraction due to unloading by large and small strain theories all meet the requirements. The findings could be applied to the quantitative analysis for the stability of borehole wall soil during boring and the bearing characteristics of bored piles.
- bored pile /
- intermediate principal stress /
- unified strength theory /
- unloading /
- analytical solution

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	杨砚宗. 砂土考虑卸荷效应的钻孔灌注桩试验与理论研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2011.
[2]	龚辉. 黏性土中钻孔灌注桩径向卸荷效应及其对桩侧摩阻力的影响机制[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2013.
[3]	LUKOSE A, THIYYAKK S. Analysis of cavity expansion and contraction in unsaturated residual soils[J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2022, 28(4): 405-419.
[4]	WU Y, ZHANG X F, ZHAO C, et al. Effects of soil unloading and grouting on the vertical bearing mechanism for compressive piles[J/OL]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 271[2023-09-20]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113754.
[5]	王振峰, 赵婷, 徐明霞, 等. 深开挖后土体卸荷导致隧道隆起变形的算法[J]. 工业建筑, 2022, 52(3): 53-59.
[6]	YU H S, ROWE R K. Plasticity solutions for soil behaviour around contracting cavities and tunnels[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1999, 23(12): 1245-1279.
[7]	YU H S, HOULSBY G T. A large strain analytical solution for cavity contraction in dilation soils[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1995, 19(11): 793-811.
[8]	ZHAO C F, YANG YZ, ZHAO C, et al. Analytical solution for borehole contraction caused by radial unloading[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013, 17(1): 60-67.
[9]	温世游, 陈云敏, 唐晓武, 等. 排水条件下球形空腔收缩问题的弹塑性分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(13): 2251-2256.
[10]	温世游, 陈云敏, 李夕兵. 考虑应变软化特性的缩孔解析解[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(增刊2): 2432-2438.
[11]	张治国, 徐晨, 宫剑飞. 隧道开挖对邻近桩基变形及承载能力影响的弹塑性解答[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(1):208-222.
[12]	赵春风, 费逸, 赵程, 等. 无黏性土中钻孔径向卸荷收缩理论解[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2020, 52(4):135-141.
[13]	MO P S, YU H S. Undrained cavity-contraction analysis for prediction of soil behavior around tunnels[J/OL]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(5)[2023-09-20]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000081.
[14]	CHEN S L, ABOUSLEIMAN Y N. Drained and undrained analyses of cylindrical cavity contractions by bounding surface plasticity[J/OL]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2016, 53(9)[2023-09-20].https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0605.
[15]	胡云世, 孙庆, 韩进宝. 圆柱孔收缩的线弹性-完全塑性解及其应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(5): 162-168.
[16]	张亚国, 肖书熊, 翟张辉, 等. 考虑黏土结构性影响的柱孔卸荷收缩问题解析及数值验证[J]. 中国公路学报, 2023, 36(5): 88-98.
[17]	张家奇, 赵春风, 赵程, 等. 考虑弹塑性卸荷的柱孔和球孔反向扩张解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3224-3234.
[18]	赵春风, 贾尚华, 赵程. 基于统一强度准则的柱孔扩张问题及扩孔孔径分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(11):1634-1641.
[19]	ZHAO C F, FEI Y, ZHAO C, et al. Analysis of expanded radius and internal expanding pressure for undrained cylindrical cavity expansion[J/OL]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2018, 18(2)[2023-09-20]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001058.
[20]	龚辉, 赵春风. 基于统一强度理论桩孔稳定性分析[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 27(2): 237-241.
[21]	赵春风, 王有宝, 吴悦, 等.考虑不同中主应力影响的钻孔卸荷缩孔效应分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2020, 52(11): 63-70.
[22]	ZHAO C F, WANG Y B, ZHAO C, et al. Analysis of drained cavity unloading-contraction considering different degrees of intermediate principal stress with unified strength theory[J/OL]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20(7)[2023-09-20]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000170.
[23]	俞茂宏. 岩土类材料的统一强度理论及其应用[ J]. 岩土工程学报, 1994, 16(2): 1-9.
[24]	汪鹏程, 朱向荣. 考虑中间主应力影响的土中孔扩张问题精确相似解[J]. 水利学报, 2004, 35(11): 68-73.
[25]	孔位学, 芮勇勤, 董宝弟. 岩土材料在非关联流动法则下剪胀角选取探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(11): 3278-3282.
[26]	ZHAO C F, WU Y, ZHAO C, et al. Pile side resistance in sands for the unloading effect and modulus degradation[J/OL]. Materiales de Construcción, 2019, 69[2023-09-20].https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2019.03718.
[27]	YU M H. Unified strength theory and its applications[M]. Singapore:Springer-Verlag, 2004.