预制地聚物混凝土夹心墙板轴心受压性能研究

赵猛; 黄俊旗; 种迅; 蒋庆; 冯玉龙

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG23061204

预制地聚物混凝土夹心墙板轴心受压性能研究

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23061204

赵猛¹,
黄俊旗^1,2, ,,
种迅^1,2,
蒋庆^1,2,
冯玉龙^1,2

1. 合肥工业大学土木与水利工程学院, 合肥 230009;
2. 土木工程结构与材料安徽省重点实验室, 合肥 230009

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(52208158)

安徽省自然科学基金项目(2208085QE172)。

详细信息

作者简介:
赵猛,博士研究生,主要从事地聚物混凝土材料及其构件结构性能研究。

通讯作者:
黄俊旗,博士,讲师,主要从事地聚物混凝土材料及夹心墙板性能研究,2019800122@hfut.edu.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 43
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-06-12
- 网络出版日期: 2024-06-24

Research on Mechanical Properties of Precast Geopolymer Concrete Sandwich Panels Under Axial Compression

ZHAO Meng¹,
HUANG Junqi^{1,2
, ,},
CHONG Xun^1,2,
JIANG Qing^1,2,
FENG Yulong^1,2

1. College of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China;
2. Anhui Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering and Materials, Hefei 230009, China

摘要

摘要: 设计并制作了6片采用地聚物混凝土和玻璃纤维增强复合材料(GFRP)六角筒形拉结件的预制混凝土夹心墙板试件,对其进行了轴心受压试验,研究了拉结件间距、墙板高度和钢筋混凝土叶板厚度3个关键参数对墙板轴压下的破坏模式、承载力、变形等的影响。试验结果表明:试件均呈现因二阶效应产生的大偏心受压破坏,表现为一侧叶板混凝土压碎和另一侧叶板混凝土水平开裂;随着拉结件间距的增加,墙板的组合性能降低,破坏时混凝土压碎区域面积减小,侧向变形增大,试件承载力逐渐降低(当拉结件间距由300 mm增加至600、 900 mm以及不设置拉结件时,承载力分别下降了17.1%、42.0%、49.5%。);随着墙板高度的减小或混凝土叶板厚度的增加,构件的长细比和二阶效应逐渐减小,破坏时混凝土压碎区面积增大,平面外变形减小,试件的承载力增加(当叶板厚度由50 mm增至75 mm时或高度从2 100 mm降至1 500 mm时,试件承载力分别提高了34.3%、5.9%)。
- 地聚物混凝土 /
- 预制混凝土夹心墙板 /
- FRP拉结件 /
- 轴心受压 /
- 破坏模式
Abstract: Six precast geopolymer concrete sandwich panels enabled by glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) hexagonal tubular connectors were fabricated and tested under axial compression. The effects of three key parameters, including the connector spacing, panel height and wythe thickness, on the failure mode, bearing capacity and deformation of the specimens under axial compression were studied and discussed. The results showed that all specimens exhibited large eccentric compression failure due to the second-order effect, which was characterized by the concrete crushing and horizontal cracking in the two wythes, respectively; with the increase of the distance between the connectors, the composite performance of the wall panel was reduced, the area of the concrete crushing area decreased, the lateral deformation increased, and the bearing capacity of the specimens decreased gradually (when the distance between the connectors increased from 300 mm to 600, 900 mm, and without connectors, the bearing capacity decreased by 17.1%, 42.0%, 49.5%, respectively). With the decrease of the height of the wall panel or the increase of the thickness of the wythes, the slenderness ratio and the second-order effect of the specimens gradually decreased, the area of the concrete crushing zone increased, the out-of-plane deformation decreased, and the bearing capacity of the specimen increased (when the thickness of the wythes increased from 50 mm to 75 mm or the height decreased from 2 100 mm to 1 500 mm, the bearing capacity of the specimen increased by 34.3% and 5.9%, respectively).
- geopolymer concrete /
- precast concrete sandwich panel /
- FRP connector /
- axial compression /
- failure mode

HTML全文

参考文献(20)

[1]	COX B, SYNDERGAARD P, AL-RUBAYE S, et.al. Lumped GFRP star connector system for partial composite action in insulated precast concrete sandwich panels[J/OL]. Composite Structures, 2019, 229[2023-06-12]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111465.
[2]	PCI Committee. State of the art of precast/prestressed concrete sandwich wall panels[J]. PCI Journal, 2011, 56(2): 131-176.
[3]	HUANG J Q, JIANG Q, CHONG X, et al. Structural performance of a facade precast concrete sandwich panel enabled by a bar-type basalt fiber reinforced polymer connector[J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(1): 122-137.
[4]	BUSH T, STINE G. Flexural behavior of composite precast concrete sandwich panels with continuous truss connectors[J]. PCI Journal, 1994, 39(2): 112-121.
[5]	EINEA A, SALMON D, TADROS M K, et al. A new structurally and thermally efficient precast sandwich panel system[J]. PCI Journal, 1994, 39(4): 90-101.
[6]	HUANG J Q, JIANG Q, CHONG X, et al. Structural performance and section optimization of precast concrete sandwich panels with pin-type GFRP connectors[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2021, 24(11): 2351-2363.
[7]	CHEN A, NORRIS T G, HOPKINS P M, et al. Experimental investigation and finite element analysis of flexural behavior of insulated concrete sandwich panels with FRP plate shear connectors[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 98: 95-108.
[8]	NORRIS T, CHEN A. Development of insulated FRP-confined precast concrete sandwich panel with side and top confining plates and dry bond[J]. Composite Structures, 2016, 152: 444-454.
[9]	HEGARTYA R, WESTB R, REILLY A, et.al. Composite behavior of fibre-reinforced concrete sandwich panels with FRP shear connectors[J/OL]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 198 [2023-06-12]. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109475.
[10]	PANTELIDES C P, SURAPANENI R, REAVELEY L D, et.al. Structural performance of hybrid GFRP/steel concrete sandwich panels [J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2008, 12:570-576.
[11]	JIANG H Z, GUO Z X, LIU J B, et al. The shear behavior of precast concrete sandwich panels with W-shaped SGFRP shear connectors[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(10): 3961-3971.
[12]	JIANG H Z, GUO Z X, LIU J B. Composite behavior of sandwich panels with W-shaped SGFRP connectors[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(5): 1889-1899.
[13]	HODICKY K, SOPAL G, RIZKALLA S, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of the FRP shear mechanism for concrete sandwich panels[J/OL]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2015, 19(5) [2023-06-12]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000554.
[14]	TOMLINSON D, TEIXEIRA N, FAM A. New shear connector design for insulated concrete sandwich panels using basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars[J/OL]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2016, 20(4) [2023-06-12]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000662.
[15]	TOMLINSON D, FAM A. Combined loading behavior of basalt FRP-reinforced precast concrete insulated partially-composite walls[J/OL]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2015, 20(3) [2023-06-12]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000611.
[16]	KUMAR S, CHEN B Q, XU Y Y, et.al. Structural behavior of FRP grid reinforced geopolymer concrete sandwich wall panels subjected to concentric axial loading[J/OL]. Composite Structures, 2021, 270[2023-06-12]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114117.
[17]	HUANG J Q, DAI J G. Flexural performance of precast geopolymer concrete sandwich panel enabled by FRP connector[J/OL]. Composite Structures, 2020, 248 [2023-06-12]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112563.
[18]	PCI Sandwich Wall Committee. State-of-the-art of precast concrete sandwich wall panels[J]. PCI Journal, 1991, 36(6): 78-98.
[19]	蒋庆, 何昶蓉, 种迅, 等. 十字形截面玻璃纤维复材拉结件预制混凝土夹芯保温外墙板受弯性能研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2018, 48(10): 110-114.
[20]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构试验方法标准:GB/T 50152—2012 [S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.