部分包覆亚型钢-混凝土组合柱抗震性能研究

陈书洁; 李俊华; 王守松

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG23042902

部分包覆亚型钢-混凝土组合柱抗震性能研究

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23042902

1. 宁波大学土木工程与地理环境学院, 浙江宁波 315211;
2. 泉州信息工程学院土木工程学院, 福建泉州 362000

基金项目:

福建省自然科学基金项目(2021J01541)。

浙江省自然科学基金项目(LZ22E080002)

详细信息

作者简介:
陈书洁,硕士研究生,主要从事组合结构研究,chenshujie0920@163.com。

通讯作者:
李俊华，教授，主要从事组合结构、结构抗震抗火及修复研究，Lijunhua@nbu.edu.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 42
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-04-29
- 网络出版日期: 2024-08-16

Research on Seismic Performance of Partially-Encased Composite Ya-Shaped Steel-Concrete Columns

1. School of Civil & Environmental Engineering and Geography Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Quanzhou Institute of Information Engineering, Quanzhou 362000, China

摘要

摘要: 目前PEC柱在实际工程中的应用越来越广泛,亚型钢PEC柱相比H型钢PEC柱承载力提高的同时结合了钢管混凝土柱的优点。为了研究亚型钢PEC柱的抗震性能,通过ABAQUS软件以剪跨比、轴压比、水平往复荷载加载方向、亚型钢腹板及翼缘厚度为参数对42个试件进行了低周反复荷载作用下的数值模拟。模拟结果表明:亚型钢PEC柱滞回性能良好,强轴和剪跨比为1.875及以上的弱轴方向加载的柱的最终破坏形态为柱底两侧开口处混凝土被压碎、亚型钢屈曲的弯曲破坏,但强轴柱底中间未开口处混凝土也严重损伤,弱轴柱没有明显损伤;剪跨比在1.875以下的弱轴柱开口处混凝土压溃、未开口处混凝土产生交叉裂缝,柱顶混凝土也有部分损伤,型钢未屈曲,为剪切破坏。通过参数的影响分析,剪跨比、翼缘和腹板厚度的增加能提高试件的延性、耗能能力以及降低刚度退化的速率,但峰值荷载随着剪跨比的增加而降低;强轴柱的峰值荷载随轴压比增大而减小,而弱轴柱的峰值荷载在轴压比小于0.3时随轴压比的增大而增大。最后提出了在一定条件下适用的亚型钢PEC柱抗震承载力计算式并根据影响参数进行修正,验证了修正后算式的可靠性,为亚型钢PEC柱在工程中的应用提供了参考。
- 亚型钢 /
- 部分包覆钢-混凝土组合柱(PEC柱) /
- 抗震性能
Abstract: At present, the application of PEC columns in practical engineering is becoming more and more widespread. Compared with H-shaped steel PEC columns, the bearing capacity of Ya-shaped steel PEC columns is improved while combining the advantages of steel tube concrete columns. In order to study the seismic performance of Ya-shaped steel PEC columns, numerical simulations were conducted on 42 specimens under quasi-static loading by using ABAQUS software, with shear-span ratio, axial compression ratio, horizontal reciprocating loading direction, thicknesses of Ya-shaped steel web plates and flanges as parameters. The simulation results showed that the hysteretic performance of the Ya-shaped steel PEC column was good. The final failure mode of the column loaded in the weak axis direction with a strong axis and shear-span ratio of 1.875 or above was the crushing of concrete at the openings on both sides of the column bottom and the bending failure of the Ya-shaped steel buckling. However, the concrete at the middle of the strong axis column bottom without an opening was also severely damaged, and the weak axis column was not significantly damaged; The concrete at the opening of the weak axis column with a shear span ratio below 1.875 was crushed, and there were cross cracks in the concrete at the unopened position. The concrete at the top of the column was also partially damaged, and the steel section was not buckled, indicating shear failure. Through the analysis of the influence of parameters, it was found that increasing the shear span ratio, thicknesses of flanges and webs could improve the ductility, energy dissipation capacity, and reduce the rate of stiffness degradation of the component, but the peak load decreased with the increase of shear-span ratio; the peak load of strong axis columns decreased with increasing axial compression ratio, while the peak load of weak axis columns increased with increasing axial compression ratio when the axial compression ratio was less than 0.3. Finally, a formula for calculating the seismic bearing capacity of Ya-shaped PEC columns under certain conditions was proposed and modified based on the influencing parameters, verifying the reliability of the revised formula and providing a reference for the application of Ya-shaped steel PEC columns in engineering.
- Ya-shaped steel /
- partially-encased composite structures of steel and concrete(PEC column) /
- seismic performance

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

[1]	中国工程建设标准化协会. 部分包覆钢-混凝土组合结构技术规程: T/CECS 719—2020[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2018.
[2]	ELNASHAI A S, TAKANASHI K, ELGHAZOULI A Y, et al. Experimental behaviour of partially encased composite beam-columns under cyclic and dynamic loads[J]. Proceedings-Institution of Civil Engineers. Part 2. Research and Theory, 1991, 91(91): 259-272.
[3]	陆佳, 丁冠中. 部分外包组合PEC柱强、弱轴滞回性能破坏模式研究分析[J]. 苏州建筑, 2012 (3): 44-46, 107.
[4]	BEGUM M D, ROBERT G, ALAA E, et al. Behaviour of partially encased composite columns with high strength concrete[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 56: 1718-1727.
[5]	林德慧, 陈以一. 部分填充钢-混凝土组合柱整体稳定分析[C]//第27届全国结构工程学术会议论文集(第Ⅰ册).西安:2018: 459-464.
[6]	赵根田, 张宇鸣, 曹芙波, 等. 焊接H形钢部分包裹高强混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2019, 40(4): 116-122.
[7]	李补拴, 周伟, 赵根田, 等. 部分包覆钢-混凝土十字形和T形组合柱抗震试验及轴压比限值分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2023, 44(8):99-109.
[8]	王威, 甄国凯, 权超超, 等. 竖向梯形波纹腹板PEC柱轴压性能研究[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2022, 54(4): 29-38.
[9]	宋世明, 李杰, 陈以一, 等. 双H形钢部分包覆钢-混凝土组合柱压弯试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2019, 40(增刊1): 171-178.
[10]	ZHAN X X, QIN Z W, LI J, et al. Global stability of axially loaded partially encased composite column with L-shaped section[J]. Journal of constructional Steel Research, 2023, 200, 107671.
[11]	DING F X, YING X Y, ZHOU L C, et al. Unified calculation method and its application indetermining the uniaxial mechanical properties of concrete[J]. Frontiers Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2011, 5(3): 381-393.
[12]	韩林海. 钢管混凝土结构:理论与实践[M]. 3版. 北京:科学出版社, 2016.
[13]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震试验规程: JGJ/T 101—2015[S].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
[14]	冯鹏, 强翰林, 叶列平. 材料、试件、结构的"屈服点"定义与讨论[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(3): 36-46.
[15]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
[16]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢结构设计标准: GB 50017—2017[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2018.