Seismic Performance Analysis of Concrete Composite Torsional Columns Strengthened with CFRP Based on Cohesion Model
-
摘要: 碳纤维增强复合材料(CFRP)-混凝土界面力学性能是影响CFRP加固结构抗震性能的重要因素。建立了基于非线性软化力学行为可模拟CFRP加固结构黏结界面的双线性内聚力单元,考虑混凝土与钢筋的材料非线性,对CFRP加固混凝土复合受扭柱抗震性能进行了有限元分析。分析了CFRP及黏结界面的应力变化、界面破坏机制以及结构的承载力,与试验以及不考虑界面黏结滑移的有限元分析结果进行了比较,以验证方法的合理性,并改进了CFRP的布置方式。有限元分析结果表明:CFRP的拉应力、黏结界面应力与损伤变量等呈现截面中部、转角处大,CFRP交界处小的分布特点,剥离破坏随加载过程由应力大的CFRP边缘向中部扩展;有限元分析所得结构破坏过程与试验的基本一致,揭示了黏结界面退化对CFRP加固混凝土柱结构抗震性能的影响,所得各阶段最大荷载与试验结果的相对误差小于10%;不考虑黏结界面性能的退化与CFRP的剥离,则高估了强化阶段CFRP对承载力的贡献。黏结界面内聚力模型可为CFRP加固混凝土复合受扭柱抗震性能分析提供参考。Abstract: The mechanical properties of CFRP-concrete interface are important factors affecting the seismic performance of CFRP reinforced structures. A bilinear cohesive force unit based on nonlinear softening mechanical behavior was established to simulate the bonding interface of CFRP reinforced structures. Considering the material nonlinearity of concrete and rebars, the seismic performance of CFRP reinforced concrete composite torsional columns was analyzed by finite element method. In order to verify the rationality of the method and improve the arrangement of CFRP, the stress variation, the failure mechanism of the interface and the bearing capacity of the structure were analyzed. The results were compared with the experimental results and the finite element analysis results without considering the interface bonding slip. The results of finite element analysis showed that the tensile stress, bonding interface stress and damage variables of CFRP were large in the middle and corners of the section, but small at the junction of CFRP. The stripping failure expanded from the edge of CFRP with large stress to the middle during the loading process. The structural failure process obtained by finite element analysis was basically consistent with the experimental results, which revealed the influence of bonding interface degradation on the seismic performance of CFRP reinforced concrete columns. The relative error between the maximum load obtained at each stage and the experimental results was less than 10%. Without considering the degradation of bond interface properties and the stripping of CFRP, the contribution of CFRP to the bearing capacity in the strengthening stage was overestimated. The cohesive force model of bond interface could provide a reference for seismic performance analysis of CFRP reinforced concrete composite torsional columns.
-
[1] 魏超. 基于内聚力模型的FRP加固混凝土梁受力性能数值分析[D].重庆:重庆大学,2018. [2] 陈杰. FRP加固钢筋混凝土柱抗震性能的试验研究[D]. 南京:东南大学, 2004. [3] 魏琏, 王森. 扭转不规则建筑竖向构件考虑扭矩影响的抗震验算方法[J]. 建筑结构, 2006, 36(7):8-10,20. [4] 胡少伟. 组合梁抗扭分析与设计[M]. 北京:人民交通出版社, 2005. [5] DAOUADJI T H, RABAHI A, ABBES B, et al. Theoretical and finite element studies of interfacial stresses in reinforced concrete beams strengthened by externally FRP laminates plate[J]. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2016,3(12):1253-1280. [6] 崔佳庆,姜福香,王宁,等.FRP-混凝土界面粘结-滑移关系研究[J].低温建筑技术,2019,41(6):13-16,30. [7] 曹双寅,潘建伍,陈建飞,等.外贴纤维与混凝土结合面的粘结滑移关系[J].建筑结构学报,2006(1):99-105. [8] SUBRAMANIAM K V, CARLONI C, NOBILE L. An understanding of the width effect in FRP-concrete debonding[J]. Strain, 2011, 47(2):127-137. [9] SHARMA S K, ALI M, GOLDAR D, et al. Plate-concrete interfacial bond strength of FRP and metallic plated concrete specimens[J]. Composites Part B, 2006, 37(1):54-63. [10] YUAN H, TENG J G, SERACINO R, et al. Full-range behavior of FRP-to-concrete bonded joints[J]. Engineering Structures, 2004, 26(5):553-565. [11] 张海霞,何禄源.基于ABAQUS的表面内嵌CFRP筋粘结滑移性能数值模拟分析[J].工程力学,2014,31(增刊1):239-244. [12] 张彬,邹仁华,李强,等.碳纤维布加固局部强度不足混凝土柱轴压性能的有限元分析[J].建筑结构,2016,46(增刊2): 451-455. [13] 袁非凡,王作虎,崔宇强.FRP加固钢筋混凝土偏心受压柱尺寸效应的有限元分析[J].施工技术,2016,45(增刊2):804-807. [14] 陆新征,谭壮,叶列平,等.FRP布-混凝土界面粘结性能的有限元分析[J].工程力学,2004(6):45-50. [15] 吴业飞,陈伟球.基于内聚力模型的FRP-混凝土粘结强度分析[J].工程力学,2010,27(7):113-119. [16] 崔佳庆. 外贴CFRP-混凝土界面粘结性能有限元分析[D].青岛:青岛理工大学,2019. [17] SALOMONSSON K. Mixed mode modeling of a thin adhesive layer using a meso-mechanical model[J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2008, 40(8):665-672. [18] 邵永健, 曹晓罗, 孙宝强. 一种构件复合受扭实验装置及方法:CN103115828A[P].2014-10-15. [19] 张劲,王庆扬,胡守营,等.ABAQUS混凝土损伤塑性模型参数验证[J].建筑结构,2008(8):127-130. [20] 曾宇,胡良明.ABAQUS混凝土塑性损伤本构模型参数计算转换及校验[J].水电能源科学,2019,37(6):106-109. [21] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010—2010 [S].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 61
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0