Quasi-Static Loading Tests and Numerical Simulations of Restoring Force Characteristics of T-Joints Between PCCC Columns and RC Ring Beams
-
摘要: 为研究聚氯乙烯-碳纤维增强复合材料(PVC-CFRP)管混凝土柱-钢筋混凝土(RC)环梁T型节点的恢复力特性,完成了11根试件的低周反复荷载试验。试验结果表明:增大的环梁节点能有效实现PVC-CFRP管混凝土柱与RC梁的连接,试件显示出良好的抗震性能。在此基础上,优选材料本构关系,采用纤维模型法,编制非线性分析程序,开展节点拟静力试验数值模拟研究,模型预测结果与试验结果吻合较好。基于验证的数值模型,延拓分析环梁节点混凝土强度、环梁高度、梁纵筋配筋率、柱直径以及纵筋屈服强度等参数对其骨架曲线的影响规律,并提出合理设计建议。数值模拟结果表明:环梁节点核心区混凝土强度由20 MPa增至60 MPa,试件的峰值弯矩提高13.7%,极限位移降低8.0%;梁纵筋配筋率由2%增至5%,试件的峰值弯矩提高26.3%,极限位移降低19.9%;梁纵筋屈服强度由400 MPa增至600 MPa,试件的峰值弯矩提高56.3%,极限曲率降低17.9%;试件环梁高度由350 mm增至450 mm,试件的峰值弯矩影响不明显,而极限位移降低11.0%;柱直径由200 mm增至300 mm,试件的峰值荷载提高56.3%,极限位移增加28.5%。
-
关键词:
- PVC-CFRP管混凝土 /
- 节点 /
- 抗震性能 /
- 恢复力特性 /
- 数值模拟
Abstract: To investigate the restoring force characteristics of T-joints between PVC-CFRP confined concrete columns and RC ring beams, eleven exterior joint specimens under quasi-static loading were tested. The experimental results showed that the enlarged ring beam joints could effectively connect the PVC-CFRP confined concrete columns and RC beams, and the joint specimens showed favorable seismic performance. On the basis of the experimental study, the material constitutive relations were reasonably selected, the fiber model method was adopted, the nonlinear analysis program was compiled, and the quasi-static tests of the exterior joint specimens were simulated numerically. The model predicted results agreed well with the experimental data. Based on the numerical model verified by experiments, the effects of concrete strength, height of ring beam, longitudinal reinforcement ratio of beam, column diameter and yield strength of longitudinal reinforcement on skeleton curves were analyzed, and reasonable design suggestions were proposed. The numerical simulation results showed that when the concrete strength of the ring beam joint increased from 20 MPa to 60 MPa, the peak bending moment increased by 13.7%, while the ultimate displacement decreased by 8.0%. As the longitudinal reinforcement ratio of beam increased from 2% to 5%, the peak bending moment increased by 26.3%, while the ultimate displacement decreased by 19.9%. As the yield strength of beam longitudinal reinforcement increased from 400 MPa to 600 MPa, the peak bending moment increased by 56.3%, while the ultimate curvature decreased by 17.9%. When the height of ring beam increased from 350 mm to 450 mm, the peak bending moment showed little influence, while the ultimate displacement decreased by 11.0%. When the column diameter increased from 200 mm to 300 mm, the peak load increased by 56.3%, and the ultimate displacement increased by 28.5%. -
[1] FAM A, PANDO M, FILZ G, et al. Precast piles for Route 40 bridge in Virginia using concrete filled FRP tubes[J]. PCI Journal, 2003, 48(3): 32-45. [2] BOUNARAFI A, ABOUZIED A, MASMOUDI R. Harsh environments effects on the axial behaviour of circular concrete-filled fibre reinforced-polymer (FRP) tubes[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2015, 83: 81-87. [3] SAAFI M. Development and behavior of a new hybrid column in infrastructure systems [D]. Huntsville, Texas: Doctoral dissertation of the University of Alabama, 2001. [4] YU F, XU G S, NIU D T, et al. Experimental study on PVC-CFRP confined concrete columns under low cyclic loading[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 177: 287-302. [5] JIANG S F, MA S L, WU Z Q. Experimental study and theoretical analysis on slender concrete-filled CFRP-PVC tubular columns [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 53: 475-487. [6] FENG C C, YU F, FANG Y. Mechanical behavior of PVC tube confined concrete and PVC-FRP confined concrete: a review[J]. Structures, 2021, 31(3): 613-635. [7] 于峰, 程安春, 徐国士. PVC-CFRP管钢筋混凝土柱抗震性能非线性有限元分析[J].计算力学学报, 2015, 32(6):781-788. [8] 马福栋, 邓明科, 杨勇. 超高性能混凝土装配整体式框架梁柱节点抗震性能研究[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(10): 90-102. [9] LIANG X W, WANG Y J, TAO Y, et al. Seismic performance of fiber-reinforced concrete interior beam-column joints[J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 126(11): 432-445. [10] LI W, XU L F, QIAN W W. Seismic performance of concrete-encased CFST column to steel beam joints with different connection details[J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 204(2),109875. [11] CHENG Y, YANG Y L, LI B Y, et al. Mechanical behavior of T-shaped CFST column to steel beam joint[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2021, 187(12),106774. [12] MA D Y, HAN L H, ZHAO X L. Seismic performance of the concrete-encased CFST column to RC beam joint: experiment[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 154(3): 134-148. [13] NIE J G, BAI Y, CAI C S. New connection system for confined concrete columns and beams. I: experimental study[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2008, 134(12): 1787-1799. [14] 陈庆军,蔡健,徐刚,等.节点区柱钢管不连通式钢管混凝土柱-梁节点轴压承载力[J].工程力学,2008(9):170-175. [15] DONG B Q, PAN J L, XU L. Numerical and theoretical analysis of beam-to-column connections with ECC ring beams subjected to local compression loading[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 52(7),104466. [16] BU S S, YU F, FENG C C, et al. Local compressive behavior of joint core reinforced with ring beam for connection of polyvinyl chloride fiber-reinforced polymer confined concrete column and reinforced concrete beam[J]. Structural Concrete, 2020, 21(4): 1523-1543. [17] YU F, FENG C C, FANG Y, et al. Experimental study on low-strength concrete joint core strengthened with steel meshes for connecting PFCC column and RC beam[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2021, 24(4): 797-814. [18] YU F, GUAN Y C, LIU Q Q, et al. Compressive behavior of joint core confined with core steel tube for connection of polyvinyl chloride-carbon fiber reinforced polymer-confined concrete column and reinforced concrete beam[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2020, 23(12): 2570-2586. [19] YU F, ZHANG N N, NIU D T, et al. Strain analysis of PVC-CFRP confined concrete column with ring beam joint under axial compression[J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 224(9),111012. [20] YU F, SONG Z K, MANSOURI I, et al. Experimental study and finite element analysis of PVC-CFRP confined concrete column-ring beam joint subjected to eccentric compression[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 254(9),119081. [21] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 定向纤维增强聚合物基复合材料拉伸性能试验方法: GB/T 3354—2014[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014. [22] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 热塑性塑料管材拉伸性能测定 第1部分: 试验方法总则: GB/T 8804.1—2003[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2003. [23] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 金属材料 拉伸试验 第1部分: 室温试验方法: GB/T 228.1—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. [24] 李子龙. PVC-CFRP管混凝土柱-钢筋混凝土环梁T型节点抗震性能研究[D]. 马鞍山:安徽工业大学, 2020. [25] 张强,周德源,伍永飞,等. 钢筋混凝土框架结构非线性分析纤维模型研究[J]. 结构工程师,2008(1):15-20,25. [26] 李笑然,王元丰. 基于纤维模型的钢筋混凝土柱滞回性能数值分析[J]. 北京交通大学学报,2012,36(6):68-73. [27] 张颖,赵晖,王蕊,等. 外包不锈钢管中空夹层钢管混凝土压弯构件Nu-Mu相关曲线研究[J]. 工程力学,2023,40(2):124-134. [28] 朱德丰. PVC-FRP管混凝土柱-钢筋混凝土梁节点轴压性能研究[D]. 马鞍山: 安徽工业大学, 2018. [29] VECCHIO F J, COLLINS M P. Compression response of cracked reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1993, 119(12): 3590-3610.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 80
- HTML全文浏览量: 17
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0