高中低拉拔速率下筋土界面拉拔试验分析

王家全; 王梦莲; 唐毅; 祁航翔

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG22091601

高中低拉拔速率下筋土界面拉拔试验分析

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22091601

广西科技大学土木建筑工程学院, 广西壮族自治区岩土灾变与生态治理工程研究中心, 广西柳州 545006

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目（41962017）；广西自然科学基金重点项目（2022GXNSFDA035081）；广西高等学校高水平创新团队及卓越学者计划项目（桂教人才〔 2020〕 6号）；广西研究生教育创新计划项目（YCSW2021310）； 2020年广西高校中青年教师科研基础能力提升项目（2020KY08023）。

详细信息

作者简介:
王家全，博士，教授，博士生导师，wjquan1999@163.com。

通讯作者:
唐毅，硕士，助理研究员，tyi-moon@163.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 56
- HTML全文浏览量: 10
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-09-16
- 网络出版日期: 2024-05-29

Pullout Tests and Analysis of Reinforced Soil Interfaces at High, Medium and Low Pullout Rates

College of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Engineering Research Center of Geotechnical Disaster and Ecological Control, Liuzhou 545006, China

摘要

摘要: 边坡及挡墙倒塌破坏会导致土工格栅与土之间快速滑动，筋土界面相互作用较为复杂。通过对不同拉拔速率下界面筋材受力和变形特性的研究，有助于加深对筋–土界面工作特性的认识。基于此，采用拉拔试验以拉拔速率和法向荷载为研究因素探讨了9种拉拔速率和3种法向荷载对筋–土界面作用特性的影响规律。结果表明：峰值拉拔力随着拉拔速率由低到高变化增大幅度逐渐变缓，界面黏聚力与拉拔速率呈正相关变化趋势，最大增大了278%；界面摩擦角呈负相关变化趋势，最大减小了19.1%。格栅应变在低速时受拉拔速率影响较大，随着拉拔速率的增大而增大；当拉拔速率超过5 mm/min时，格栅应变变化幅度减小，抗拔刚度增大。界面剪胀量随拉拔速率的增大呈增大趋势，随法向荷载的增大呈减小趋势。高速时界面剪胀量约为低速时的1.56倍、中速时的1.13倍。
- 土工格栅 /
- 拉拔速率 /
- 界面作用 /
- 拉拔试验
Abstract: Landslide and retaining wall collapse damage will cause rapid sliding between geogrids and soil, and the interaction of reinforced soil interfaces is complicated. It helps to deepen the understanding for mechanical characteristics of reinforced soil interfaces by studying the force and deformation characteristics of reinforced materials at interfaces at different pollout rates. Thus, the pullout tests with nine pullout rates and 3 normal loads were conducted, which were expected to explore the effect laws of pullout rates and normal loads on mechanical characteristics of reinforced soil interfaces. The results showed that the increase degrees of peak pullout force gradually slowed down with the increase in pullout rates. The interfacial cohesion was positively correlated with pullout rates, and it had grown by a maximum of 278%; the interfacial friction angle was negative correlated with pullout rates, and it had decreased by a maximun of 19.1%. The strain of the geogrids was more seriously influenced by pullout rates at low speeds and increased with the increase in pullout rates; when the pullout rate exceeded 5 mm/min, the strain variance of geogrids decreased and the pullout stiffness of geogrids increased. The interfacial shear dilation increased with the increase in pullout rates, and decreased with the increase in normal loads. The interfacial shear dilation at high speed was about 1.56 times of that at low speed and about 1.13 times of that at medium speed.
- geogrid /
- pullout rate /
- interfacial action /
- pullout test

HTML全文

参考文献(19)

[1]	王家全,康博文,周圆兀,等.填料粗粒含量对筋土界面拉拔性状的影响[J].岩土力学, 2022, 43(5):1249-1260.
[2]	DERKSEN J, ZIEGLER M, FUENTES R. Geogrid-soil interaction:a new conceptual model and testing apparatus[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2021, 49(5):1393-1406.
[3]	WANG Z, JACOBS F, ZIEGLER M. Experimental and DEM investigation of geogrid-soil interaction under pullout loads[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2016, 44(3):230-246.
[4]	BATHURST R J, EZZEIN F M. Geogrid pullout load-strain behaviour and modelling using a transparent granular soil[J]. Geosynthetics International, 2016, 23(4):271-286.
[5]	EZZEIN F M, BATHURST R J. A new approach to evaluate soil-geosynthetic interaction using a novel pullout test apparatus and transparent granular soil[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2014, 42(3):246-255.
[6]	苗晨曦.格栅加筋粗粒料界面细观特性及性能优化研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学, 2016.
[7]	杨广庆,李广信,张保俭.土工格栅界面摩擦特性试验研究[J].岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(8):948-952.
[8]	肖成志,路遥,郑鸿,等.加筋土结构筋-土界面特性和筋材位移变化规律试验研究[J/OL].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),(2022-03-08)[2022-08-28]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1218.TU.20220307.1050.002.html.
[9]	肖成志,罗亚楠,王子寒,等.土工格栅-砂土界面特性的拉拔试验研究[J].深圳大学学报(理工版), 2019, 36(3):252-259.
[10]	史旦达,刘文白,水伟厚,等.单、双向塑料土工格栅与不同填料界面作用特性对比试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2009, 30(8):2237-2244.
[11]	PALMEIRA E M. Bearing force mobilisation in pull-out tests on geogrids[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2004, 22(6):481-509.
[12]	VIEIRA C S, PEREIRA P, FERREIRA F, et al. Pullout behaviour of geogrids embedded in a recycled construction and demolition material. Effects of specimen size and displacement rate[J/OL]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(9):[2022-09-16]. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093825.
[13]	徐超,赵春风,叶观宝.关于土与土工合成材料界面的试验研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2004(3):307-311.
[14]	徐林荣.筋土界面参数测试方法合理选择研究[J].岩土力学, 2003(3):458-462.
[15]	中华人民共和国水利部.土工合成材料测试规程:SL 235-2012[S].北京:中国计划出版社, 2012.
[16]	郑俊杰,曹文昭,周燕君,等.三向土工格栅筋-土界面特性拉拔试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2017, 38(2):317-324.
[17]	刘文白,周健.土工格栅与土界面作用特性试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2009, 30(4):965-970.
[18]	徐超,廖星樾.土工格栅与砂土相互作用机制的拉拔试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2011, 32(2):423-428.
[19]	中华人民共和国交通部.公路工程土工合成材料试验规程:JTG E50-2006[S].北京:人民交通出版社, 2006.