Research on the Performance of Desert Sand Concrete Under Dry-Wet Cycles with Sulfate Erosion
-
摘要: 对干湿循环作用下硫酸盐侵蚀沙漠砂混凝土进行力学性能试验研究,采用质量损失率、抗压耐蚀系数、相对动弹性模量来表征沙漠砂混凝土硫酸盐-干湿循环作用下性能劣化。试验结果表明:随着干湿循环次数增加,沙漠砂混凝土质量损失率先减小后增大,抗压耐蚀系数和相对动弹性模量先增大后减小。干湿循环60次时,质量损失率达到最小值,抗压耐蚀系数和相对动弹性模量达到最大值。随着硫酸盐溶液浓度升高,抗压耐蚀系数和相对动弹性模量降低幅度增大,取代率为40%的沙漠砂混凝土抗压耐蚀系数和相对动弹性模量比普通混凝土高。以动弹性模量定义损伤度,相对峰值应力和峰值应变与损伤度呈指数关系,其相关系数均达到0.93以上。Abstract: In order to study the performance of desert sand concrete after sulfate attack, the mechanical properties of sulfate attacked desert sand concrete under the action of wet-dry cycles were tested. The mass loss rate, compressive corrosion resistance coefficient and dynamic elastic modulus were used to symbol the mechanical properties deterioration of desert sand concrete under the action of sulfate erosion and wet-dry cycles. Experimental results showed that with the increase of the number of dry-wet cycles, the mass loss rate of desert sand concrete decreased firstly and then increased. The compressive corrosion resistance coefficient and relative dynamic modulus of elasticity increased firstly and then decreased. When the number of wet-dry cycles was equal to 60, the mass loss rate of desert sand concrete reached the minimum, and the compressive corrosion resistance coefficient and relative dynamic modulus of elasticity arrived at maximum. The higher the sulfate solution concentration, the greater the decrease in compressive corrosion resistance coefficient and relative dynamic modulus. The compressive corrosion resistance coefficient and relative dynamic modulus of desert sand concrete with the desert sand replacement ratio of 40% were higher than that of ordinary concrete. Dynamic elastic modulus was used to define damage variable. The relative peak stress and peak strain were exponentially related to the damage variable, the correlation coefficients of which were all above 0.93.
-
Key words:
- desert sand concrete /
- sulphate erosion /
- wet-dry cycle /
- stress-strain curve /
- damage
-
[1] 樊自立,马英杰,马映军.中国西部地区的盐渍土及其改良利用[J].干旱区研究,2001(3):1-6. [2] 余红发,孙伟,王甲春,等.盐湖地区混凝土的长期腐蚀产物与腐蚀机理[J].硅酸盐学报,2003(5):434-440. [3] 孙迎召,牛荻涛,姜磊,等.干湿循环条件下混凝土硫酸盐侵蚀损伤分析[J].硅酸盐通报,2013,32(7):1405-1409. [4] 刘海峰,马菊荣,付杰,等.沙漠砂混凝土力学性能研究[J].混凝土,2015(9):80-83. [5] 王雪艳,刘明辉,刘萱,等.沙漠砂+机制砂混凝土力学性能及碳排放研究[J].土木工程学报,2022,55(2):23-30. [6] SEIF E S A. Assessing the engineering properties of concrete made with fine dune sands:an experimental study[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2013, 6(3):857-863. [7] 李志强,王国庆,杨森,等.沙漠砂混凝土力学性能及应力-应变本构关系试验研究[J].应用力学学报, 2019, 36(5):1131-1137. [8] 刘海峰,马映昌,张润奇,等.冻融环境下沙漠砂对混凝土轴心受压力学性能的影响[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2021, 53(3):101-109. [9] 董瑞鑫,申向东,薛慧君,等.干湿循环作用下风积沙混凝土的抗硫酸盐侵蚀机理[J].材料导报, 2020, 34(24):24040-24044. [10] YUAN J, LIU Y, TAN Z C, et al. Investigating the failure process of concrete under the coupled actions between sulfate attack and drying-wetting cycles by using X-ray CT[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 108:129-138. [11] 姜磊,牛荻涛.硫酸盐侵蚀与干湿循环下混凝土本构关系研究[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2017, 46(1):66-73. [12] ZHANG H R, JI T, LIU H. Performance evolution of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) exposed to external sulfate attacks under full-soaking and dry-wet cycling conditions[J/OL]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 248[2020-07-10]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118675. [13] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.普通混凝土长期性能和耐久性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50082-2009[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009. [14] 梁咏宁,袁迎曙.硫酸盐侵蚀环境因素对混凝土性能退化的影响[J].中国矿业大学学报,2005,34(4):452-457. [15] LI Y Y, LING H J, LI Z L, et al. Comparison of durability and mechanism between sprayed concrete and ordinary concrete at different erosion age[J/OL]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2021, 33(8)[2021-05-25]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) MT.1943-5533.0003767. [16] MELARA E K, TRENTIN P O, PEREIRA E, et al. Contribution to the service-life modeling of concrete exposed to sulfate attack by the inclusion of electrical resistivity data[J/OL]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 322[2022-03-07]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126490. [17] 甘磊,吴健,沈振中,等.硫酸盐和干湿循环作用下玄武岩纤维混凝土劣化规律[J].土木工程学报,2021, 54(11):37-46. [18] LI Y G, ZHANG H M, LIU G X, et al. Multi-scale study on mechanical property and strength prediction of aeolian sand concrete[J/OL]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 247[2020-06-30].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118538. [19] ZHUTOVSKY S, HOOTON R D. Experimental study on physical sulfate salt attack[J/OL]. Materials and Structures, 2017, 50(1)[2017-08-15]. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0936-z. [20] LI J, XIE F, ZHAO G, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of cast-in-situ concrete under external sulfate attack and drying-wetting cycles[J/OL]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 249[2020-07-20]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118789. [21] XIAO Q H, LI Q, CAO Z Y, et al. The deterioration law of recycled concrete under the combined effects of freeze-thaw and sulfate attack[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2019, 200:344-355. [22] LIU F, YOU Z P, XIONG R, et al. Effects of sodium sulfate attack on concrete incorporated with drying-wetting cycles[J/OL]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021[2021-08-13]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5393504. [23] 关博文,邸文锦,王发平,等.干湿循环与交变荷载作用下混凝土硫酸盐侵蚀损伤[J].吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(4):1112-1121. [24] ZUO X B, SUN W, YU C. Numerical investigation on expansive volume strain in concrete subjected to sulfate attack[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 36:404-410. [25] LIU P, CHEN Y, YU Z W, et al. Effect of sulfate solution concentration on the deterioration mechanism and physical properties of concrete[J/OL]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 227[2019-12-10]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.022. [26] LIAO K, ZHANG Y, ZHANG W, et al. Modeling constitutive relationship of sulfate-attacked concrete[J/OL]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 260[2020-11-10].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat. 2020.119902.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 75
- HTML全文浏览量: 11
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0