高强箍筋约束混凝土柱抗震性能和累积损伤分析

侯翀驰; 汪凯旋; 郑文忠; 刘雨晨; 张力佳; 李宏斌

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG22111310

高强箍筋约束混凝土柱抗震性能和累积损伤分析

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22111310

1. 沈阳建筑大学土木工程学院, 沈阳 110168;
2. 哈尔滨工业大学土木工程学院, 哈尔滨 150090;
3. 武汉理工大学基建处, 武汉 430070;
4. 中国建筑第二工程局有限公司, 北京 100160

基金项目:

辽宁省自然科学基金博士科研启动项目（2023-BS-133）；辽宁省教育厅基本科研项目（LJKM20220920）；国家自然科学基金项目（51678190）。

详细信息

作者简介:
侯翀驰，博士，副教授，主要从事工程结构与构件抗震、新型低碳绿色混凝土结构化应用方面研究， chongchihou@sjzu.edu.cn。

通讯作者:
刘雨晨，硕士，中级工程师，主要从事工程结构与构件抗震、新型低碳绿色混凝土结构化应用方面研究， yuchenliu@whut.edu.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 64
- HTML全文浏览量: 10
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 1
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-11-13
- 网络出版日期: 2024-05-29

Seismic Performance and Cumulative Damage Analysis of Concrete Columns Confined by High-Strength Stirrups

1. School of Civil Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China;
3. Infrastructure Department, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China;
4. China Construction Second Engineering Bureau Ltd., Beijing 100160, China

摘要

摘要: 损伤指标可以量化结构或构件在地震作用下的损伤程度，为震后结构损伤评估及结构抗震设计提供重要的理论依据。因此，开展了15个配置高强箍筋的约束混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究和累积损伤分析。试验结果表明：达到峰值点时，约束箍筋尚未屈服，约束箍筋拉应力为屈服强度的56%~91%，达到极限位移时，约束箍筋屈服但仍未被拉断；配置高强箍筋的约束混凝土在整个受力过程中展现出良好的承载力和变形能力。针对混凝土强度等级为C50、配置HRB500纵筋的高强箍筋约束混凝土柱，不同损伤模型的计算结果与试验结果表明：Chai模型能够较为准确地预测损伤程度。对于剪跨比为3、配筋率和配箍率较大的试件，在轻微破坏和中等破坏阶段，Kunnath模型计算的损伤指数稍微偏小。付国模型在各阶段均能较好地预测损伤程度，但损伤指数计算值大于1，计算结果不收敛。剪跨比较大的约束混凝土柱会降低其损伤发展速度，轴压比的增加会加剧约束混凝土的损伤程度。高配筋率和高体积配箍率的约束混凝土柱损伤发展速度较慢，相同循环次数下，损伤程度较低。在约束混凝土柱设计中，可通过合理配置纵向钢筋和约束箍筋，降低和延缓约束混凝土柱的累积损伤。
- 高强箍筋 /
- 约束混凝土柱 /
- 抗震性能 /
- 损伤模型 /
- 损伤指数
Abstract: The damage index can quantify the damage degree of structures and components under earthquake, and provide an important theoretical basis for the post-seismic damage assessment and design of structures. For this reason, this paper conducted on the experiments of seismic performance and cumulative damage analysis about 15 concrete columns confined by high-strength stirrups. The test results showed that the stirrup did not yield at the peak point and the tensile stress of stirrup was 56%–91% of the yield strength. The stirrup could yield at the ultimate displacement but did not break. The concrete columns confined by high-strength stirrups showed good bearing capacity and deformation capacity in the whole loading process. For concrete columns confined by high-strength stirrups whose concrete grade is C50 and longitudinal reinforcement strength grade is HRB500, the comparison between calculated results of different damage models and test results showed that the Chai model could accurately predict the damage degree. For specimens with a shear-span ratio of 3, larger reinforcement ratio and stirrup ratio, the damage index calculated by Kunnath model was slightly smaller at the stage of minor damage and moderate failure. The Fu model could predict the damage degree of confined concrete columns at five stages, but the calculated values were greater than 1 and did not converge. Confined concrete columns with larger shearspan ratio would decrease the development rate of damage, and the increase in axial compression ratio would aggravate the damage degree of confined concrete columns. With high reinforcement ratio and stirrup ratio, the damage development rate was slower and the damage degree was relatively lower with the same cyclic times. In the stirrup design of confined concrete columns, the cumulative damage can be decreased and delayed based on a rational configuration of longitudinal rebar sand stirrups.
- high-strength stirrup /
- confined concrete columns /
- seismic performance /
- damage models /
- damage index

HTML全文

参考文献(24)

[1]	赵少伟,韩松,朱凯. 600 MPa级钢筋混凝土短柱抗震性能研究[J].工业建筑, 2017, 47(6):1-12.
[2]	孙治国,司炳君,王东升,等.高强箍筋高强混凝土柱抗震性能研究[J].工程力学, 2010, 27(5):128-136.
[3]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.
[4]	ACI Committee 318. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary:ACI 318-19[S]. Farmington Hills:American Concrete Institute, 2019.
[5]	NZS 3101. Concrete structures standard part 1-the design of concrete structures[S]. Wellington:Standard Association of New Zealand, 2006.
[6]	LI Y Z, CAO S Y, JING D H. Concrete columns reinforced with high-strength steel subjected to reversed cycle loading[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2018, 115(4):1037-1048.
[7]	HOU C C, ZHENG W Z, LI S, et al. Experimental investigation of full-scale concrete columns confined by high-strength transverse reinforcement subjected to lateral cyclic loading[J]. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 20:115.
[8]	苏俊省,王君杰,王文彪,等.高强度螺旋箍筋约束下混凝土圆柱的抗震性能试验研究[J].地震工程与工程震动, 2014, 34(4):206-211.
[9]	苏俊省,王君杰,王文彪,等.配置高强钢筋的混凝土矩形截面柱抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2014, 35(11):20-27.
[10]	SU J S, WANG J J, LI Z X, et al. Effect of reinforcement grade and concrete strength on seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge piers[J/OL]. Engineering Structure, 2019, 198[2019-11-10]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.109512.
[11]	史庆轩,杨文星,王秋维,等.高强箍筋高强混凝土短柱抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2012, 33(9):49-58.
[12]	杨坤,孟和,史庆轩,等.高强箍筋约束高强混凝土柱的最小配箍特征值研究[J].工业建筑, 2015, 45(6):66-71.
[13]	SHI Q X, MA L C, WANG Q W, et al. Seismic performance of square concrete columns reinforced with grade 600 MPa longitudinal and transverse reinforcement steel under high axial load[J]. Structures, 2021, 32:1955-1970.
[14]	YANG K, SHI Q X, LIN Q. Seismic performance and confinement reinforcement design of high-strength concrete columns confined with high-strength stirrups[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2021, 24(10):2061-2075.
[15]	PARK Y J, ANG A H S. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1985, 111(4):722-739.
[16]	KUNNATH S K. PANAHSHAHI N, REINHORM A M. Seismic response of RC buildings with inelastic floor diaphragms[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991, 117(4):1218-1237.
[17]	CHAI Y H, ROMSTAD K M, BIRD S M. Energy-based linear damage model for high-intensity seismic loading[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1995, 121(5):857-864.
[18]	付国,刘伯权,邢国华.基于有效耗能的改进Park-Ang双参数损伤模型及其计算研究[J].工程力学, 2013, 30(7):84-90.
[19]	苏佶智,刘伯权,邢国华.钢筋混凝土柱地震损伤模型比较研究[J].世界地震工程, 2018, 34(2):80-88.
[20]	孙传智,缪长青,李爱群,等.配置630 MPa级高强钢筋的混凝土柱抗震损伤指数模型修正[J].地震工程与工程震动, 2020, 40(1):121-132.
[21]	HWANG S K, YUN H D, PARK W S, et al. Seismic performance of high-strength concrete columns[J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2005, 57(5):247-260.
[22]	ZHU W Q, JIA J Q, GAO J C, et al. Experimental study on steel reinforced high-strength concrete columns under cyclic lateral force and constant axial load[J]. Engineering Structure, 2016, 125:191-204.
[23]	KRATZIG W B, MEYER I F, MESKOURIS K. Damage evolution in reinforced concrete members under cyclic loading[C]//Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliablity. San Francisco:1989:795-802.
[24]	刁波,李淑春,叶英华.反复荷载作用下混凝土异形柱结构累积损伤分析及试验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2008, 29(1):57-63.