考虑压型钢板影响的钢筋桁架-混凝土组合板静力性能设计方法

杜威; 王文富; 方敏杰; 周华; 卫华; 王庆贺

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG22110911

考虑压型钢板影响的钢筋桁架-混凝土组合板静力性能设计方法

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22110911

杜威^1,2,
王文富^1,2,
方敏杰^1,2,
周华^1,2,
卫华^1,2,
王庆贺^2,3, ,

1. 中建铁路投资建设集团有限公司, 南昌 330038;
2. 中国建筑第三工程局有限公司, 南昌 330038;
3. 沈阳建筑大学土木工程学院, 沈阳 110168

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(51808351)。

辽宁省教育厅基础研究项目(2020lnjc07)

详细信息

作者简介:
杜威,男,1986年出生,工程师,412236599@qq.com。

通讯作者:
王庆贺,男,1987年出生,教授,博士生导师,wangqinghe@sjzu.edu.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 74
- HTML全文浏览量: 19
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-11-09
- 网络出版日期: 2023-08-18

Design Methods for Static Performance of Steel-Bars Truss Slabs Considering Effects of Profiled Steel Sheets

DU Wei^1,2,
WANG Wenfu^1,2,
FANG Minjie^1,2,
ZHOU Hua^1,2,
WEI Hua^1,2,
WANG Qinghe^{2,3
, ,}

1. China State Construction Railway Investment & Construction Group Co., Ltd., Nanchang 330038, China;
2. China Construction Third Engineering Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Nanchang 330038, China;
3. School of Civil Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究钢板底模对钢筋桁架-混凝土组合板的受弯承载力、短期及长期刚度的影响,首先评述了国内外钢筋混凝土板与钢-混凝土组合板设计方法的特点及适用范围,采用现有钢筋桁架-混凝土组合板的试验结果验证了各设计方法的可靠性;在此基础上,提出了考虑压型钢板影响的钢筋桁架-混凝土组合板静力性能设计方法。结果表明:极限荷载作用下压型钢板可达到屈服强度,带钢板底模的组合板试件比无钢板底模的试件受弯承载力提高47.0%~60.3%;尽管正常使用荷载作用下压型钢板的应变略低于理论计算值,但其对组合板短期刚度的贡献非常明显,提高幅度达112.1%~180.0%;钢板底模的密闭作用导致混凝土收缩变形沿截面高度的分布是非均匀的,组合板长期挠度增大119.7%;试件跨高比与环境相对湿度是影响钢筋桁架-混凝土组合板收缩性能的关键参数,考虑非均匀收缩影响提出的长期挠度设计公式具有较高的预测精度,公式计算结果与有限元分析结果比值的均值为0.951~0.979,判定系数R²为0.657~0.873。
- 钢筋桁架-混凝土组合板 /
- 静力性能 /
- 非均匀收缩 /
- 有限元分析 /
- 设计方法
Abstract: To investigate the effects of profiled steel sheets on the flexural capacity, short-term and long-term stiffness of steel-bars truss slabs, typical design methods for reinforced concrete slabs and composite steel-concrete slabs were first summarised and evaluated, and benchmarked against the test results reported by the authors and other researchers. Design procedures were then proposed for steel-bars truss slabs considering the influence of profiled steel sheets. The results indicated that the profiled steel sheets in steel-bars truss slabs could reach their yield strength under ultimate limit state, and therefore an increase of 47.0%-60.3% in the flexural capacity was observed for steel-bars truss slabs when compared to slab samples without profiled steel sheets; the contribution of profiled steel sheets to the short-term stiffness was significant, and the increase magnitudes were 112.1%-180.0%, despite the strains of profiled steel sheets under the normal service load were smaller than expected; the sealing effect of profiled steel sheets resulted in uneven distribution of shrinkage deformation of concrete along the height of cross section, and an additional 119.7% deflection could be obtained accordingly. Span-to-depth ratio and ambient relative humidity were the key factors that influenced the shrinkage performance of steel-bars truss slabs, and the proposed design procedures accounting for non-uniform shrinkage distributions showed good accuracy with the test results, with the ratio of 0.951-0.979 and the correlation coefficient R² of 0.657-0.873.
- steel-bars truss slab /
- static performance /
- non-uniform shrinkage /
- finite element analysis /
- design method

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	WANG Q, RANZI G, WANG Y Y, et al. Long-term behaviour of simply-supported steel-bars truss slabs with recycled coarse aggregate [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 116(7): 335-346.
[2]	张恺. 钢筋桁架再生混凝土组合板长期性能研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2015.
[3]	何守民. 钢筋桁架组合楼板刚度试验研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2013.
[4]	陈玲珠, 李国强, 蒋首超, 等. 高温下钢筋桁架楼承板中栓钉抗剪性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(5): 116-123.
[5]	胡宪鑫. 钢筋桁架混凝土楼板受力性能分析[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2015.
[6]	丁军伟. 钢筋桁架混凝土双向组合楼板振动舒适度的试验研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2013.
[7]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 组合楼板设计与施工规范: CECS 273∶2010[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2010.
[8]	王庆贺. 考虑非均匀收缩影响的钢-再生混凝土组合板长期性能[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2017: 90-96.
[9]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010—2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2017.
[10]	American Concrete Institute(ACI). Committee 318. Building code requirements for reinforced concrete:ACI 318-89[S]. Detroit: ACI, 1989.
[11]	European Committee for Standardization (ECS). Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures: EN 1992-1-1[S]. Brussles, Belgium: ECS, 2000.
[12]	Standards Association of Australia. Concrete structures: AS 3600-2009[S]. Sydney: Standards Association of Australia, 2009.
[13]	American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Composite steel floor deck-slabs: ANSI/SDI C-2011[S]. Washington D C: ANSI, 2011.
[14]	European Committee for Standardization (ECS). Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures: EN 1994-1-1[S]. Brussles, Belgium: ECS, 2004.
[15]	Standards Association of Australia. Composite structures: AS/NZS 2327[S]. Sydney: Standards Association of Australia, 2017.
[16]	完海鹰, 车建萍, 赵磊. 压型钢板对钢筋桁架楼板承载力影响的试验研究[J]. 建筑技术, 2014, 45(3): 265-268.
[17]	魏盟,王庆贺,王玉银,等. 考虑非均匀收缩影响的钢-混凝土组合板长期挠度设计方法研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2017,38(增刊1): 9-17.
[18]	National Bureau of Statistics of China. Statistical yearbook of China 2017: average relative humidity of major cities [EB/OL]. [2017-10-21]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2017/indexch.htm.