不同骨架连接方式及覆面板类型小截面木框架墙体抗侧性能研究

龙卫国; 李秋稷; 刘宜丰; 鲁纹帆; 欧加加; 潘鹏

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG22090806

不同骨架连接方式及覆面板类型小截面木框架墙体抗侧性能研究

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22090806

龙卫国¹,
李秋稷¹,
刘宜丰^1,2, ,,
鲁纹帆¹,
欧加加^1,3,
潘鹏²

1. 中国建筑西南设计研究院有限公司, 成都 610042;
2. 清华大学, 北京 100084;
3. 中国建筑西南设计研究院有限公司国家标准木结构设计规范管理组, 成都 610042

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划（2019YFD1101001）。

详细信息

作者简介:
龙卫国,男,1967年出生,硕士,教授级高级工程师。

通讯作者:
刘宜丰,男,1974年出生,博士,教授级高级工程师,Lyf0142@163.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 93
- HTML全文浏览量: 10
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-09-08
- 网络出版日期: 2023-10-17

Research on Lateral Resistance of Small-Section Wooden Frame Shear Walls with Different Post-Beam Connections and Cladding Panel Types

LONG Weiguo¹,
LI Qiuji¹,
LIU Yifeng^{1,2
, ,},
LU Wenfan¹,
OU Jiajia^1,3,
PAN Peng²

1. China Southwest Architectural Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610042, China;
2. Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
3. China National Organization for Timber Construction Design Standard, China Southwest Architectural Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610042, China

摘要

摘要: 小截面木框架剪力墙是由小截面框架柱（端柱）、间柱和覆面板组成。剪力墙梁柱连接方式、覆面板剪切模量对墙体抗侧性能影响的相关研究较少。通过覆面板剪切模量测试试验得到了不同类型覆面板的剪切模量特征值，在此基础上，对3种不同连接方式的墙体、2种不同厚度的针叶材胶合木板墙体以及OSB板墙体进行低周往复试验研究和数值模拟分析，得到墙体的破坏模式、平均刚度、平均强度、延性系数和刚度退化规律。结果表明：采用金属榫连接的墙体正负双方向性能更稳定；针叶材胶合板和OSB板的剪切模量特征值分别为291.67 MPa和389.17 MPa；12 mm厚胶合板墙体的刚度和承载力分别高于同厚度OSB板墙体2.95%和39.5%，24 mm厚胶合板墙体刚度和承载力分别高于同厚度OSB板墙体16.39%和25.1%。研究成果进一步明确了影响小截面木框架剪力墙抗侧性能的主要因素，对该体系的应用和推广有重要的指导意义。
- 小截面木框架剪力墙 /
- 低周反复荷载 /
- 受力性能 /
- 刚度
Abstract: Small-section wooden frame shear wall is composed of small-section frame columns (end columns), studs and cladding panels. There are few researches on the influence of beam-column connection mode and shear modulus of cladding panel on the lateral resistance of shear wall. The shear modulus characteristic values of different types of cladding panels were obtained through shear modulus test.On this basis, the quasi-static loading test and numerical simulation test were carried out on three walls with metal tenon, inclined nail connection and straight tenon-metal connection, two coniferous plywood walls with different thickness and two OSB board walls with different thickness, the failure mode, average stiffness, average strength, ductility coefficient and stiffness degradation law of the wall were obtained. The results showed that the average stiffness and average bearing capacity of walls with three connections were not significantly different, but the push-pull bidirectional performance of the wall with metal tenon connections was more stable. The characteristic value of the shear modulus of the coniferous plywood was 291.67 MPa, and that of the OSB board was 389.17 MPa; the stiffness and bearing capacity of 12 mm thickness plywood wall were 2.95% and 39.5% higher than those of OSB wall with the same thickness, and the stiffness and bearing capacity of 24 mm thickness plywood wall were 16.39% and 25.1% higher than those of OSB wall with the same thickness, respectively. The results further clarified the main influencing factors for the ateral performance of small-section wood frame shear wall, which could provide important guiding significance for the application and promotion of the system.
- small-section wooden frame shear wall /
- quasi-static loading /
- mechanical properties /
- stiffness

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.木结构设计标准:GB 50005-2017[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2017.
[2]	鲁纹帆,欧加加,刘宜丰,等. 日式小截面木框架剪力墙体系设计方法简介[J]. 建筑技术,2021,52(3):329-333.
[3]	何敏娟,周楠楠. 不同覆面材料木剪力墙抗侧性能试验研究[J].同济大学学报,2011,39(3):340-345.
[4]	周丽娜.高木剪力墙抗侧性能有限元分析[D]. 上海:同济大学,2008.
[5]	河合直人.木造轴组工法住宅の許容応力度設計[S].东京:(財)日本住宅木材技術センタ一,2008:61.
[6]	中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所.结构用人造板力学性能试验方法:GB 31264-2014[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
[7]	国家林业局.结构用定向刨花板力学性能指标特征值的确定方法:LY/T 2721-2016[S].北京:国家林业局,2016.
[8]	赵川.木框架剪力墙结构:设计与构造[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2020.
[9]	European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 5:Design of timber structures[S]. Brussels:European Committee for 8.Standardization, 2004.
[10]	祝恩淳,陈志勇,潘景龙. 覆面板钉连接的承载性能试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(9):1280-1285.
[11]	熊海贝,化明星,康加华,等.轻型木结构钉节点低周反复试验研究[J].结构工程师,2011,27(增刊1):195-200.
[12]	杜敏,费本华,谢宝元,等. 轻型木结构中钉节点试验研究[J]. 建筑结构,2012,42(7):142-145.
[13]	程海江. 轻型木结构房屋抗震性能研究[D]. 上海:同济大学,2007.
[14]	ASTM International. Standard test methods for mechanical fasteners in wood:ASTM D1761-88[S].PA,USA:ASTM Inter-national,2000.
[15]	ASTM International. Standard test methods for cyclic (Reversed) load test for shear resistance of vertical elements of the lateral force resisting systems for buildings:ASTM E2126-09[S]. PA, USA:ASTM International, 2009.
[16]	FOLZ B, FILIATRAULT A. Cyclic analysis of wood shear walls[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2001, 127(4):433-441.
[17]	International Organization for Standard. Timber structure-joint made with mechanical fasters-quasi-static reversed cyclic test method:ISO-16670[S]. Geneva:International Organization for Standard, 2003.
[18]	徐德良,吕鹏,刘伟庆,等. 硅酸钙板轻型木结构剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2018,39(增刊2):198-206.