水泥搅拌桩复合地基垫层效应研究

王啟铜; 宋神友; 陈伟乐; 夏丰勇; 陈卓杰

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG22082308

水泥搅拌桩复合地基垫层效应研究

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22082308

1. 深中通道管理中心, 广州 510600;
2. 广东省公路建设有限公司, 广州 510600;
3. 浙江大学, 杭州 310058

详细信息

作者简介:
王啟铜,男,1963年出生,博士,教授级高级工程师。

通讯作者:
陈卓杰,男,1998年出生,硕士研究生,2286849665@qq.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 210
- HTML全文浏览量: 39
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-08-23
- 网络出版日期: 2024-02-28

Study on Cushion Effect of Cement-Mixing-Pile Composite Foundation

1. Shenzhen-Zhongshan Link Management Center, Guangzhou 510600, China;
2. Guangdong Highway Construction Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510600, China;
3. Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

摘要

摘要: 深中通道为国内首次大规模采用深层水泥搅拌桩（DCM桩）处理沉管隧道地基的超级工程。由于碎石垫层+块石振密垫层+DCM桩复合地基的沉降变形规律尚不明确，为研究垫层效应对水泥搅拌桩复合地基沉降的影响规律，在现场荷载板试验的基础上，应用数值模拟的方法分析碎石垫层厚度、模量以及块石振密厚度对复合地基桩顶沉降和总沉降的影响。研究结果表明：在刚性基础下设置柔性垫层能使基础由"刚"变"柔"，垫层能调节桩、土所承担的荷载，使桩体承担的荷载变小，土体承担的荷载荷载变大，以致桩顶沉降减小，复合地基总沉降增大。随着垫层刚度的减小（厚度增大或者模量变小），其调节桩土所承担荷载的效果并不会一直变大，在复合地基承载力不变的同时，总沉降继续增大。从提高复合地基承载力和控制沉降考虑，结合工程实际情况，建议碎石垫层的厚度取0.4~0.8 m，模量取10~20 MPa，块石振密的厚度取0.7~1.1 m。
- 沉管隧道 /
- 复合地基 /
- 垫层效应 /
- 沉降
Abstract: Shenzhen-Zhongshan Link was a super infrastructure project in China, in which the deep cement-mixed piles (DCM piles) were first widely used to improved the foundation of the immersed tunnel. Due to a lack of knowledge about settlement laws of composite foundation composed of the gravel cushion, the block-stone-vibrated cushion and DCM plies, to study the effect of cushion on settlement of composite foundation of DCM plies, based on the static load test on site, the influence of thickness, moduli of the gravel cushion and the block-stone-vibrated thickness on the settlement of pile tops and the total settlement of composite foundation were analyzed by numerical simulations. The results indicated that the flexible cushion under the rigid foundation could make the foundation flexible from rigid, and the cushion could adjust the loads shared by piles and soil, so that loads shared by piles became smaller and loads borne by soil were larger, which leaded to the settlement of pile tops decreased and the total settlement of composite foundation increased. With the decrease of cushion stiffness (increasing thicknesses or decreasing moduli), the adjusting effect of loads shared by piles and soil would not maintain continuous growth. With the increase of total settlement, the bearing capacity of composite foundation almost remained stable. To improve the bearing capacity of composite foundation and control settlement, combined with the actual project, it was suggested that the thickness of the gravel cushion should range from 0.4 to 0.8 m, the modulus should range from 10 to 20 MPa, and the block-stone-vibrated thickness should range from 0.7 to 1.1 m.
- immersed tunnel /
- composite foundation /
- cushion effect /
- settlement

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

[1]	HOLM G. State of practice in dry deep mixing methods[C]//The 3rd International Conference on Grouting and Ground Treatment. Geotechnical Special Publication, 2003,120(120):145-163.
[2]	龚晓南. 广义复合地基理论及工程应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(1):1-13.
[3]	张伟丽, 蔡健, 林奕禧, 等. 垫层对水泥土搅拌桩复合地基沉降的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(12):4027-4032.
[4]	刘鹏, 杨光华, 范泽, 等. 褥垫层对刚性桩复合地基承载性状的影响[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2015, 32(2):13-18.
[5]	张旭群, 杨光华, 陈锐, 等. CM桩复合地基桩土应力比及垫层效应现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(增刊1):357-361.
[6]	尹检亮, 张国祥. 粉喷桩复合地基大刚度垫层特性研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2020, 17(2):341-348.
[7]	朱小军, 孔伟阳, 费康, 等. 复合地基垫层刺入量模型试验与计算方法研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(2):412-419.
[8]	刘毅, 孙以正. 复合地基工作性状影响因素分析[J]. 公路, 2017, 62(8):16-20.
[9]	肖耀廷, 党发宁. 复合地基褥垫层厚度的设计方法研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(5):1331-1335.
[10]	王正振, 龚维明, 戴国亮, 等. 厚垫层-砂桩复合地基现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(10):3755-3762.
[11]	芮瑞, 孙义, 朱勇, 等. 刚性基础下复合地基褥垫层细观工作机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2):445-454.
[12]	何杰, 张可能, 刘杰, 等. 夯实水泥土桩复合地基中桩-土-垫层共同作用机理[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 43(6):2288-2294.
[13]	亓乐, 施建勇, 侯仟. 复合地基桩体对垫层的刺入量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(3):815-819 ,824.
[14]	张爽, 唐春安, 张向东. 季节性冻土地区高铁路基沉降研究[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 34(8):1202-1205.
[15]	周志军, 郑昊. 桩体刺入全过程褥垫层的工作特性[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2019, 41(3):41-48.
[16]	付佰勇, 宋神友, 徐国平, 等. 碎石垫层与深层水泥搅拌桩复合地基沉降研究[J]. 公路, 2021, 66(5):65-70.