Z2类疲劳破坏叠合板组合梁疲劳性能试验研究

袁西贵; 张凯

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG22012509

Z2类疲劳破坏叠合板组合梁疲劳性能试验研究

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22012509

袁西贵¹,
张凯^2, ,

1. 成都职业技术学院城建学院, 成都 610218;
2. 四川职业技术学院建筑工程学院, 四川遂宁 629000

基金项目:

四川省教育厅2017年度科研计划自然科学类重点项目(17ZA0140)

装配式建造技术科研创新团队(22KYTD02)

校级科研项目(成职院[2022]-124号:22CZYG019)。

详细信息

作者简介:
袁西贵,男,1971年出生,高级工程师,副教授。

通讯作者:
张凯,男,1968年出生,工程硕士,54547242@qq.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 55
- HTML全文浏览量: 13
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-01-25
- 网络出版日期: 2023-07-01

Experimental Research on Fatigue Life of Composite Beams with Laminated Slabs and Z2 Fatigue Details

YUAN Xigui¹,
ZHANG Kai^{2
, ,}

1. School of Urban Construction of Chengdu Polytechnic, Chengdu 610218, China;
2. Construction Engineering School of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College, Suining 629000, China

摘要

摘要: 为推广装配式建造技术及钢-混凝土组合梁在桥梁结构和吊车梁中的应用,有必要对各类构造细节的组合梁疲劳寿命进行试验研究,本论文通过对6根组合梁(其中5根叠合板组合梁,1根现浇板组合梁)施加等幅疲劳荷载,并采用双对数函数对其中5根发生Z2类构造细节疲劳破坏组合梁试验数据进行线性拟合,得到了基于Z2类构造细节组合梁疲劳破坏时的S-N曲线。试验结果与欧洲钢结构协会(ECCS)的规定十分接近,与GB 50017—2003《钢结构设计规范》符合得很好,但与现行GB 50017—2017《钢结构设计标准》有一定偏差,主要是因为新旧标准对构造细节分类有所不同。采用新标准结果偏于不安全,现阶段在整梁试验数据有限的情况下进行组合梁的设计时,建议按照GB 50017—2003中的相关规定进行复核。
- 构造细节 /
- 叠合板组合梁 /
- 应力幅 /
- 疲劳寿命
Abstract: In order to popularize the prefabrication construction technology and the application of steel-concrete composite beams in bridge structures and crane beams, it is necessary to carry out experimental research on fatigue life of composite beams with various structural details. 6 composite beams (including 5 composite beams with laminated slabs and 1 composite beam with cast-in-place slabs) were subjected to constant amplitude fatigue load. The double logarithm function was used to linearly fit the test data of 5 composite beams with Z2 structural details, and the S-N curve was obtained. The test results were very close to the provisions of European Convention for Constructional Steelwork (ECCS) and in good agreement with Code for Design of Steel Structures (GB 50017—2003), but there was a certain deviation from GB 50017—2017, mainly because their classifications of structural details were different. The adoption to GB 50017—2017 were unsafe. At this stage, it was recommended to review the design of composite beams in accordance with the relevant provisions of GB 50017—2003.
- structural details /
- composite beam with laminated slabs /
- stress amplitude /
- fatigue life

HTML全文

参考文献(10)

[1]	聂建国,王宇航.钢-混凝土组合梁疲劳性能研究综述[J].工程力学,2012,29(6):1-11.
[2]	聂建国,沈聚敏,袁彦声等.钢-混凝土组合梁连接件实际承载力的研究[J].建筑结构学报,1996,17(2):21-25.
[3]	袁西贵.基于疲劳试验的组合梁疲劳破坏形态的判别[J].工业建筑,2022,52(8):147-151.
[4]	项贻强,何百达.考虑疲劳损伤的栓钉式组合梁剩余承载力计算方法[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2020,47(9):33-39.
[5]	袁西贵.钢-混凝土叠合板组合梁疲劳性能的试验研究[D].北京:清华大学,2005.
[6]	GERHARD H,MARKUS P,CENK U.Resistance of headed studs subjected to fatigue loading. Part I:experimental study[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2007, 63(4):485.
[7]	汪炳. 基于疲劳累积损伤效应的钢-混凝土组合梁桥剩余力学性能研究[D].南京:东南大学,2017:77-88.
[8]	全国钢标准化技术委员会.钢及钢产品力学性能试验取样位置及试样制备:GB/T 2975-2018[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
[9]	聂建国,刘明, 叶列平, 等.钢-混凝土组合结构[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005.
[10]	李建军.钢-混凝土组合梁疲劳性能的试验研究[D].北京:清华大学,2002.