Comparison on Wind-Resistant Design of Transmission Towers by Allowable Stress Method and Limit State Method
-
摘要: 我国仍有大量采用容许应力法设计的在役77/78系列输电塔位于强风区,电网运行部门需要依据现行规范逐步进行加固改造。分别按照容许应力法和极限状态法给出了输电塔杆件安全系数表达式,对比分析了我国不同时期输电线路设计规范的风荷载和结构设计方法。以2021年发生风灾倒塔的两基77/78系列输电塔为研究对象,分别采用容许应力法和极限状态法计算了输电塔杆件应力、应力比和安全系数,并确定了强风下输电塔薄弱杆件位置。结果表明:SDJ 3—1979《架空送电线路设计技术规定》设计的输电塔安全系数明显低于SDGJ 94—90《架空送电线路杆塔结构设计技术规定》和DL/T 5154—2002《架空送电线路杆塔结构设计技术规定》,安全系数相差20%以上;且后两个规定设计的输电塔安全系数基本相当。Abstract: There are still many in-service 77/78 series transmission towers designed by the allowable stress method in the strong wind area. The power grid operation departments need to gradually carry out reinforcement and retrofit according to the applicable standards. According to the allowable stress method and the limit state method, the safety factor expressions of transmission tower members were given separately, and the wind load and structural design methods in the standards of different periods in China were compared and analyzed. Two 77/78 series transmission towers destroyed in 2021 wind disaster were selected as the research objects. The stress, stress ratios and safety factors of the transmission tower members were calculated according to the allowable stress method and the limit state method, respectively. The weak positions of the typical transmission towers under strong wind were determined. The safety factors of the transmission tower designed according to SDJ 3-1979 were significantly lower than that of SDGJ 94-90 and DL/T 5154-2002, and the difference in safety factors was more than 20%. The safety level of the transmission tower designed according to SDGJ 94-90 and DL/T 5154-2002 was basically the same.
-
Key words:
- allowable stress method /
- limit state method /
- transmission tower /
- wind load /
- safety factor
-
[1] 沈其明, 邓和平.结构设计中的容许应力法和概率极限状态设计法[J]. 重庆交通学院学报, 1985(2):12-17. [2] 邓江涛. 极限状态法与容许应力法在铁路桥梁设计应用中的差异性比较[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2021, 65(2):72-76. [3] 谢馨, 杜萍. 简支钢桁梁桥的极限状态法与容许应力法对比[J]. 交通科技, 2021(4): 53-57. [4] 杨风利, 张宏杰, 杨靖波 等. 下击暴流作用下输电铁塔荷载取值及承载性能分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2014,34(24):4179-4186. [5] 裴慧坤, 陈城, 林国安, 等. 强风荷载作用下500kV输电塔线体系动力分析[J]. 工业建筑, 2019, 49(12): 25-30,41. [6] 中华人民共和国水利电力部.架空送电线路设计技术规定:SDJ 3—1979[S]. 北京: 水利电力出版社, 1979. [7] 能源部电力规划设计管理局.架空送电线路杆塔结构设计技术规定:SDGJ 94—1990[S]. 北京: 能源部电力规划管理局, 1990. [8] 中华人民共和国国家经济贸易委员会.架空送电线路杆塔结构设计技术规定:DL/T 5154—2002[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2002. [9] 国家能源局.架空输电线路杆塔结构设计技术规定:DL/T 5154—2012[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2012. [10] 国家能源局.架空输电线路杆塔结构设计技术规程:DL/T 5468—2020[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2021. [11] 冯云芬, 贡金鑫, 李宏男, 等. 输电线路杆塔构件可靠度校准[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(5): 13-20. [12] 杨风利. 输电线路风冰荷载重现期及结构可靠性影响分析[J]. 结构工程师, 2020, 36(6):90-97. [13] 黎景辉, 李敏生. 输电线路历年规程与新荷载规范风荷载对比[J]. 南方能源建设, 2020, 7(3):102-106. [14] 陈海波, 廖宗高, 肖洪伟. 受风荷载控制的杆塔结构体系可靠度分析[J]. 电力建设, 2007, 28(7): 40-45. [15] 俞登科, 李正良, 李茂华, 等. 基于矩方法的特高压输电塔抗风可靠度分析[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(5): 311-316. [16] 李峰, 袁骏, 侯建国, 等. 我国输电线路结构设计可靠度研究[J]. 电力建设, 2010, 31(11): 18-23. [17] 中华人民共和国建设部.钢结构设计规范:TJ 17—74[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1975. [18] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009—2012[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 168
- HTML全文浏览量: 26
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0