应力释放法检测混凝土应力的标准化方法研究

尚仁杰; 曾滨; 荣华; 许庆; 徐曼; 徐晓达

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21102601

应力释放法检测混凝土应力的标准化方法研究

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21102601

中冶建筑研究总院有限公司, 北京 100088

详细信息

作者简介:
尚仁杰,男,1966年出生,教授级高级工程师。电子信箱:shangrenjie@aliyun.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 72
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-10-26

Research on Standardized Method of Stress Release Method for Measuring the Stress of Concrete

Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co., Ltd., MCC Group, Beijing 100088, China

摘要

摘要: 预应力值检测是预应力混凝土结构检测的重要内容,但是,至今尚无标准化检测方法;超长混凝土结构温度收缩应力常引起大量混凝土结构裂缝超过相关规范要求,但是,对混凝土结构温度收缩应力的现场检测始终没有有效的方法。对不同截面形式、不同受力状态的4种情况进行了混凝土保护层开双槽应力释放的有限元模拟,在分析了应变释放率-槽深关系的基础上,提出了保护层25 mm开槽法和最大释放率法。发现,保护层25 mm开槽法的开槽速度快,可以消除温度的影响;最大释放率法数据稳定,推测值更为准确。最后通过某工程的现场测试验证了所提方法的可操作性和准确性。
- 应力释放法 /
- 预应力 /
- 温度收缩应力 /
- 应力检测
Abstract: Prestress detection is an important content of prestressed concrete structure detection, but there is no standardized method. The temperature shrinkage stress of super-long concrete structures after causes a large number of cracks which exceed the requirements of relevant specifications, but there is no effective method to detect the temperature shrinkage stress of concrete structures in situ. The finite element simulation of double groove stress release of concrete cover was carried out under four conditions of different sections and different stress states. Based on the analysis of the relations between strain release rate and groove depth, the 25 mm grooving method and the maximum release rate method of concrete cover were proposed. For concrete cover 25mm grooving method, the influence of temperature could be eliminated because of the grooving speed was fast. The data of maximum release rate method was stable and the predicted value was more accurate. The maneuverability and accuracy of the method were verified by field test of a certain project.
- stress release method /
- prestress /
- temperature shrinkage stress /
- stress detection

HTML全文

参考文献(12)

[1]	金鹏,李喜德.残余应力分析方法比较:X射线衍射法与应力释放法[J].实验力学, 2015,48(7):82-92.
[2]	VALENTINI E, BENINCASA A, BERTELLI L. An automatic system for measuring residual stress by ring-core method[C]//40th National Convention. Palermo:2011.
[3]	杨新华.开槽法测试结构工作应力的有限元分析[J].建筑结构,1998,38(4):50-52.
[4]	尚仁杰,谢应鹏,吴向东,等. 超长混凝土结构温度收缩应力检测方法:ZL200910086950.X[P].2009-11-18.
[5]	杨勇,王灿,朱新实.既有桥梁结构混凝土现存应力测量与分析[J].同济大学学报,1999,27(2):198-202.
[6]	翁冠群.桥梁预应力损失检测技术及安全评估[C]//2001年全国公路桥梁维修与加固技术研讨会论文集.台北:2001.
[7]	刘永淼, 王柏生, 沈旭凯.环孔法检测混凝土工作应力的试验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2006,27(增刊2):776-778,782.
[8]	王柏生, 沈旭凯, 林湘祁.开槽法测试混凝土工作应力的试验研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2010,49(9):1754-1759.
[9]	付波,向洪,袁铜森.钢筋混凝土桥梁工作应力测试研究[J].湖南交通科技,2007,33(2):68-71.
[10]	王小明,赵冲久,徐满意.钻孔法检测残余预应力的有限元计算[J].港口工程,2008(1):26-29,49.
[11]	尚仁杰,李谦,黄其华,等. 一种无粘结预应力筋切筋后端部预应力检测装置及检测方法:ZL201610206830.9[P]. 2016-06-15.
[12]	尚仁杰,黄其华,李谦.使用19年的预应力混凝土结构现存预应力值检测与统计分析[J].工业建筑,2016,46(4):78-82.