安全壳结构内压极限承载能力分析

杨昕光; 李吉娃; 徐海翔; 刘凯; 宋正峰

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21102021

安全壳结构内压极限承载能力分析

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21102021

杨昕光^1,2,
李吉娃^1,2,
徐海翔^1,2,
刘凯^1,2,
宋正峰^1,2

1. 中冶建筑研究总院有限公司, 北京 100088;
2. 中冶检测认证有限公司, 北京 100088

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划（2019YFB1900903）；中国博士后面上基金项目（2019M650997）。

详细信息

作者简介:
杨昕光,男,1983年出生,博士(后),高级工程师。电子信箱:yyfreshman@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 117
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-10-20
- 网络出版日期: 2022-05-27

ULTIMATE BEARING CAPABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO INTERNAL PRESSURE

1. Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co., Ltd., MCC Group, Beijing 100088, China;
2. Inspection and Certification Co., Ltd., MCC Group, Beijing 100088, China

摘要

摘要: 对安全壳内压破坏机理进行了探讨，确定了安全壳功能性失效破坏准则与结构性失效破坏准则，并采用混凝土损伤模型与非线性有限元数值模拟对“华龙一号”安全壳结构进行了内压极限承载能力分析，研究了安全壳结构在内压作用下的破坏过程，明确了安全壳结构的内压极限承压能力。计算结果表明：当内压增加至2.5倍设计压力时，安全壳首先在设备闸门口附近发生损伤开裂，并进入塑性工作状态；当内压增加至2.713倍设计压力时，钢内衬开始出现撕裂，说明安全壳已达到其功能性失效破坏极限状态；当内压增加至2.857倍设计压力时，安全壳混凝土在设备闸门口附近出现大面积损伤开裂，局部产生较大的位移而发生失稳破坏，达到其结构性失效破坏极限状态。
- 核安全壳 /
- 极限承载力 /
- 内压 /
- 有限元模拟
Abstract: The failure mechanics of containment subjected to internal pressure were studied, and the functional and structural failure criteria were determined. Then, based on the concrete damage model, the nonlinear finite element analysis of the HPR1000 containment was carried out in order to research the failure process and determine the ultimate bearing capability of the containment subjected to internal pressure. The results showed that the damage and cracking first occurred near the equipment hatch when the inner pressure was increased to 2.5 times of the design pressure, indicating that the containment entered the plastic state. When the inner pressure was increased to 2.713 times of the design pressure, the steel lining began to be teared,which indicated that the containment reached the functional failure limit state. When the inner pressure was increased to 2.857 times of the design pressure, the concrete near the equipment hatch was damaged severely, and the failure occurred because of the considerable local displacement. It was illustrated that the containment reached the structural failure limit state.
- nuclear containment /
- ultimate bearing capacity /
- inner pressure /
- finite element simulation

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	HESSHEIMER M F, SHIBATA S, COSTELLO J F.Results of Overpressurization Test of a 1:4-Scale Prestressed Concrete Containment Vessel Model[R].USA:Arlington-Virginia, 2002.
[2]	PRINJA N K, SHEPHERD D, CURLEY J.Simulating Structural Collapse of a PWR Containment[J].Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2005, 235(17):2033-2043.
[3]	SANG N H, HWAN M I, BOLEE J, et al.Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Containment Vessl (PCCV) Under Severe Accident Loading[J].Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2008, 40(1):77-86.
[4]	PARMAR R M, SINGH T, THANGAMANI I, et al.Over-Pressure Test on BARCOM Pre-Stressed Concrete Containment[J].Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2014, 269:177-183.
[5]	陈勤, 钱稼茹.内压荷载下安全壳1:10模型结构非线性有限元分析[J].工程力学, 2002(6):73-77.
[6]	张会东, 林松涛, 王永焕.核电厂安全壳结构的内压承载能力计算分析[J].工业建筑, 2007, 37(8):43-46.
[7]	宋辰宁, 侯钢领, 周国良.核电厂安全壳极限抗压承载力及影响因素分析[J].核科学与工程, 2015, 35(1):95-102.
[8]	孙锋, 潘蓉, 柴国旱, 等.某核电厂LOCA下预应力混凝土安全壳响应规律初探[J].原子能科学技术, 2015, 49(10):1815-1820.
[9]	SHOKOOHFAR A, RAHAI A.Nonlinear Analysis of Pre-Stressed Concrete Containment Vessel (PCCV) Using the Damage Plasticity Model[J].Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2016, 298:41-50.
[10]	易平, 王庆康, 刘君.内压作用下CPR1000安全壳的破坏机理研究[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2016, 37(2):162-167.
[11]	裴强, 龚久宇.核电厂安全壳在设计内压作用下薄弱环节研究[J].工业建筑, 2017, 47(10):81-85.
[12]	金松, 李忠诚, 蓝天云, 等.严重事故下预应力混凝土安全壳非线性分析及性能评估[J].核动力工程, 2020, 41(4):96-100.
[13]	金松, 李忠诚, 贡金鑫, 等.预应力混凝土安全壳内压易损性及性能评估[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2020, 41(6):913-921.