基于气弹模型试验的光热电站吸热塔风致响应研究

邢国雷; 李寿英; 吴迎强; 刘敏; 王勇奉

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21101208

基于气弹模型试验的光热电站吸热塔风致响应研究

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21101208

1. 国核电力规划设计研究院有限公司, 北京 100095;
2. 湖南大学风工程与桥梁工程湖南省重点实验室, 长沙 410082

基金项目:

湖南省教育厅一般项目(19C1660)。

详细信息

作者简介:
邢国雷,男,1977年出生,硕士,高级工程师。

通讯作者:
刘敏,464933874@qq.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 84
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-10-12
- 网络出版日期: 2023-08-18

Research on Wind-Induced Responses of a Solar Tower in CSP Station Based on Aeroelastic Model Test

1. State Nuclear Electric Power Planning Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100095, China;
2. Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

摘要

摘要: 光热电站吸热塔高宽比大、频率低、阻尼小,对风荷载非常敏感。以一座243 m高的光热电站混凝土吸热塔为工程背景,采用气弹模型风洞试验方法,对其风致响应规律进行了详细研究。基于相似理论提出了一种吸热塔全气弹模型设计方法,并制作了该吸热塔气弹模型,测试结果表明:该模型的结构阻尼比低至0.3%。然后,进行了详细的气弹模型风洞试验,研究了模型阻尼比对该吸热塔风致响应的影响规律及涡激共振风速和设计风速下结构横风向和顺风向响应规律。结果表明:对该吸热塔,在设计风速范围内会发生明显的涡激共振,涡激共振临界风速为22.1 m/s;阻尼比为0.7%时,出现了明显的涡激共振响应,但当结构阻尼比增大到1.0%及以上时,涡激共振响应不明显。峰值加速度响应的最大值发生在涡激共振风速下的横风向,但峰值基底剪力响应的最大值发生在设计风速下的顺风向。
- 吸热塔 /
- 气弹模型 /
- 参数识别 /
- 涡激振动 /
- 阻尼比
Abstract: The solar tower in CSP (concentrating solar power) station is usually characterized by large height-width ratio, low frequency and small damping which makes its response is rather sensitivity to wind loads. In order to study the wind-induced responses laws of the tower, a full-scale aeroelastic model for a 243-meter-high solar tower was designed and manufactured in the paper. Measurements of the model’s dynamic response indicated a good simulation of the parameters for the prototype tower and the first-order damping ratio was as low as 0.3%. Then wind tunnel test for the aeroelastic model was conducted, the influence of the damping ratio of the model on the wind-induced responses of the tower was studied, as well as the response laws of the structure in cross-wind and along-wind directions at vortex-induced vibration resonance and design wind speed. The results indicated that vortex-induced resonance occurred significantly at a velocity of about 22.1 m/s for the prototype tower. When the damping ratio was 0.7%, there was an obvious vortex-induced response, however, when the damping ratio of the structure increased to 1.0% or more, the vortex-indused response became less obvious. In addition, the maximum peak acceleration of the tower occurred in the cross-wind direction at the vortex-induced vibration wind speed while the maximum base shear response occurred in the along-wind direction at the design wind speed.
- solar tower /
- aeroelastic model /
- parameter identification /
- vortex-induced vibration /
- damping ratio

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	TEMPLIN J T, COOPER K R. Design and performance of a multi-degree-of-freedom aeroelastic building modle[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,1981(8):157-175.
[2]	ISYUMOV N. The aeroelastic modeling of tall buildings[C]//Proceedings of International Workshop on Wind Tunnel Modeling for Civil Engineering Application. Gaithersburg, America:Cambridge University Press,1982:373-407.
[3]	全涌,顾明,黄鹏.超高层建筑通用气动弹性模型设计[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2001,29(1):122-126.
[4]	TAMURA Y, NISHIMURA I. Elastic model of reinforced concrete chimney for wind tunnel testing[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,1990,33:231-236.
[5]	赵林,葛耀军,曹丰产.双曲薄壳冷却塔气弹模型的等效梁格方法和实验研究[J]. 振动工程学报,2008,21(1):31-37.
[6]	邹云峰,牛华伟,陈政清.基于完全气动弹性模型的冷却塔风致响应风洞试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2013,34(6):60-67.
[7]	SATAKE N, SUDA K. Damping evaluation using full-scale data of buildings in Japan[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2003, 129(4): 470-477.
[8]	梁枢果, 周颖, 王磊,等. 基于连续气弹模型的超高烟囱风致响应风洞试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(10): 149-155.
[9]	ZHENG C, LIU Z, WU T, et al. Experimental investigation of vortex-induced vibration of a thousand-meter-scale mega-tall building[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2019(85): 94-109.
[10]	LIU M, LI S, WU T, et al. Eddy-current tuned mass dampers for mitigation of wind-induced response of the noor III Solar Tower: design, installation, and validation[J/OL]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2021, 147(12)[2021-10-12].https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003180.
[11]	SANADA S, NAKAMURA O, YOSHIDA M, et al. Full scale measurement of excitation and wind forces on a 200 m concrete chimney[C]//Proceedings of 7th National Symposium on Wind Engineering. Tokyo,Japan: 1982:139-146.
[12]	风洞实验指南研究委员会. 建筑风洞实验指南[M].孙瑛, 武岳, 曹正罡,译.北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.
[13]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009—2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.