Experimental Research on Fatigue Performance of Prestressed Ceramsite Concrete Composite Beams
-
摘要: 为研究预应力叠合梁施工工艺对叠合梁疲劳力学性能的影响,进行等幅疲劳试验。制作了4根预应力陶粒混凝土与普通混凝土叠合梁,其中两根进行三等分静力加载,两根进行三等分点疲劳受弯试验分析。试验结果表明,预应力陶粒混凝土T梁构件的受弯性能随着疲劳循环次数的增加在不断衰减;随着疲劳加载次数增加,同级静载作用下挠度值和钢筋应变值总体上呈现增长趋势,但变化幅度较小;最大裂缝宽度和平均裂缝宽度随着疲劳循环次数的增加而增大;对于循环加载200万次未发生疲劳破坏的试验梁,静载破坏形式仍为典型的受弯破坏,且其剩余承载能力相对于静载试验梁有一定明显降低,且后张预应力梁相比于先张预应力梁下降程度更为明显。Abstract: In order to study the influence of construction technology on the fatigue performance of pre-stressed composite beams, the constant-amplitude fatigue experiment was carried out.Four pre-stressed ceramsite concrete and ordinary concrete composite beams were fabricated, two of which were subjected to two-point static loading and two were subjected to two-point fatigue bending. The experiment results showed that the flexural performance of prestressed ceramsite concrete T-beam members was continuously attenuated with the increase of the number of fatigue cycles. As the number of fatigue loading increased, the deflection value and the strain value of steel bars under the static load of the same level generally showed an increasing trend, but the magnitude of the change was small. The maximum crack width and average crack width increased with the increase of the number of fatigue cycles. For the test beams that had experienced cyclic loading 2 million times without fatigue failure, the failure mode under static loading was still typical bending failure, and its residual bearing capacity was significantly lower than that of the test beams under static loading, and the post-tensioned prestressed beam had a more obvious decline compared to the pre-tensioned prestressed beam.
-
Key words:
- fatigue performance /
- T-shape composite beam /
- ceramsite concrete /
- prestress /
- flexural failure
-
[1] 杨宜. 装配混凝土结构重点分项工程及部位与传统施工效率质量对比分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 50(增刊2): 489-498. [2] 吴方伯, 黄海林, 周绪红,等. 预应力预制叠合梁受弯性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2011,32(5): 107-115. [3] 郭世华. 预应力混凝土在民用建筑施工的应用[J]. 中国高新区, 2018(6): 216. [4] 赵宣, 刘连新, 黄磊,等. 高性能钢筋混凝土T形梁静力和疲劳性能试验研究[J]. 施工技术, 2017, 46(22): 42-46. [5] 赵宣, 刘连新, 黄磊,等. 高性能混凝土梁疲劳破坏的研究[J]. 建筑技术, 2018, 49(1): 69-72. [6] 李强. 配置HRB600钢筋的部分预应力混凝土梁疲劳试验研究[J]. 建筑结构,2016,46(2): 8-11,29. [7] 杨鸥, 张晓非, 霍静思,等. 预应力混凝土梁疲劳性能研究现状[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2017, 34(4): 85-95. [8] 费忠宇. 梯级变幅疲劳荷载下混凝土梁性能演化试验研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2020. [9] 王准. 预应力混凝土梁疲劳剩余承载力试验研究及数值分析[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2019. [10] 王龙. 锈蚀与疲劳复合作用下钢筋混凝土梁抗弯刚度试验研究[D]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2019. [11] 马亚飞,齐洪鹤,苏小超,等.锈蚀疲劳耦合作用下钢筋混凝土梁性能退化试验[J]. 实验力学, 2020, 35(3): 472-478. [12] WANG B, HUANG Q, LIU X L. Comparison of static and fatigue behaviors between stud and perfobond shear connectors[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 23(1): 217-227. [13] QU G, HUANG P, ZHOU G, et al. Experimental research on fatigue behavior of existing reinforced concrete beams[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020(1): 1-13. [14] 黄义涛. 疲劳荷载作用下预应力混凝土梁承载能力退化研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2019. [15] 王义翔. 预应力RPC梁徐变后疲劳性能试验研究[D]. 湘潭: 湖南科技大学, 2019. [16] 周宏宇, 刘亚南, 赵晓花,等. 预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤机理及其尺寸效应试验研究[J]. 混凝土, 2020(6): 41-46. [17] 朱红兵,余志武,孙杰.钢筋混凝土T梁疲劳性能试验研究[J].公路交通科技, 2013, 30(12): 53-58. [18] 杨海威, 徐恩涛, 赵柯,等. 钢筋混凝土桥梁裂缝产生及扩展规律试验研究[C]//第27届全国结构工程学术会议. 西安:2018: 398-403. [19] 刘忠平,戴公连.预应力型钢混凝土梁静载及疲劳试验研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2019, 59(9): 13-18.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 105
- HTML全文浏览量: 27
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0