从解构到复杂性——论复杂性建筑的科学主义倾向

周官武; 姜玉艳

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21090504

从解构到复杂性——论复杂性建筑的科学主义倾向

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21090504

石家庄铁道大学建筑与艺术学院,石家庄 050043

详细信息

作者简介:
周官武,男,1971年出生,硕士,副教授。电子信箱:451147901@qq.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 135
- HTML全文浏览量: 15
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-09-05
- 网络出版日期: 2023-05-25
- 刊出日期: 2023-01-20

From Deconstruction to Complexity: On the Scientism Tendency of Complexity Architecture

School of Architecture and Art, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China

摘要

摘要: 作为当代的重要建筑现象,复杂性建筑表现出强烈的科学主义倾向。在回顾复杂性建筑运动从解构论述到复杂性论述发展过程的基础上,梳理了其理论和实践的变迁,发现复杂性建筑运动的科学主义倾向逐步强化,表现为由价值论转向科学论,突出复杂性目标,推行去价值化、去主体化以匹配科学范式,最终形成以算法、虚拟为核心的,高度依赖数学的新几何学设计策略。从而得出复杂性建筑运动的科学主义倾向推动了建筑学能力的拓展,但也因无视建筑的社会人文属性而存在诸多问题。
- 科学主义 /
- 复杂性 /
- 去价值化 /
- 去主体化 /
- 新几何学
Abstract: As an important contemporary architectural phenomenon, complexity architecture shows a strong tendency of scientism. Based on reviews of the development process for complexity architecture movement from deconstruction to complexity, the evolution of the theory and practice was clarified. The gradually increasing scientism tendency of complex architecture movement was revealed, which indicated the architecture tendency from axiology to the scientific theory, highlighting complexity objectives, implementing devaluation and desubjectification to conform to the scientific paradigm, and forming a new geometric design strategy highly dependent on mathematics and taking algorithms and virtual reality as the core. The conclusion that the scientism tendency of the complexity architecture movement promoted the expansion of architectural capability was obtained, but there were still many problems caused by departing from the inherent social and humanistic attributes of architecture.
- scientism /
- complexity /
- devaluation /
- desubjectification /
- new geometry

HTML全文

参考文献(22)

[1]	STENMARK M. Scientism:science, ethics and religion[M]. Aldershot:Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2001.
[2]	徐卫国.褶子思想,游牧空间:关于非线性建筑参数化设计的访谈[J].世界建筑, 2009(8):16-17.
[3]	CAVEMAN. Mandelbrot set wallpapers[EB/OL].(2014-10-6)[2021-07-21] . https://wallpapercave.com/mandelbrot-set-wallpaper.
[4]	黄欣荣.复杂性科学与哲学[M].北京:中央编译出版社, 2007.
[5]	范东晖,张玉坤.复杂形态与开放建筑:评析蓝天组的"复杂学"建筑[J].建筑师, 2004(12):54-58.
[6]	LAGATTA E. Ohio State's Wexner Center for the arts to offer free gallery admission every Sunday[EB/OL].(2021-01-12)[2021-07-27] . https://www.dispatch.com/story/entertainment/arts/2021/01/12/ohio-states-wexner-center-arts-offer-free-gallery-adm-ission-every-sunday/6601882002/.
[7]	CORRADI M. COOP HIMMELB (L) AU:PANEUM:wunderkammer des brotes, Asten[EB/OL].(2018-07-2)[2021-03-27] . https://www.gooood.cn/paneum-wunderkammer-des-brotes-by-coop-himmelblau.htm.
[8]	徐卫国.非线性建筑设计[J].建筑学报, 2005(12):32-35.
[9]	DELEUZE G. The fold:leibniz and the baroque[M]. London:The Athlone Press Ltd., 1993.
[10]	苗东升.分形与复杂性[J].系统辨证学学报, 2003(2):7-13.
[11]	埃森曼.彼得·埃森曼:图解日志[M].陈欣欣,何捷,译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2004.
[12]	虞刚.图解的力量:阅读格雷格·林恩的《形式表达:建筑设计中图解的原功能潜力》[J].建筑师, 2004(8):62-65.
[13]	徐卫国.非线性体:表现复杂性[J].世界建筑, 2006(12):118-121.
[14]	薛彦波,仇宁.动画形式+虚拟建造[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.
[15]	王立明,龚恺.解读格雷戈·林恩[J].建筑师, 2006(4):13-19.
[16]	JENCKS C. The new morderns[M]. New York:Rizzoli International Publications Inc, 1990.
[17]	JENCKS C. The architecture of the jumping universe[M]. Lanham:National Book Network Inc, 1996.
[18]	BARNES B. About science[M]. Oxford:Basil Blackwell, 1985.
[19]	哈耶克.哈耶克文选[M].冯克利,译.南京:江苏人民出版社, 2000.
[20]	蓝青. Greg Lynn数码建筑物语[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社, 2006.
[21]	汪愫璟.可能的几何学:读格雷格·林恩《可能的几何学:主体写作的建筑学》[J].新建筑, 2006(6):27-28.
[22]	曾欢.西方科学主义思潮的历史轨迹:以科学统一为研究视角[M].北京:世界知识出版社, 2009.