考虑接触面影响的地下结构地震响应研究

于海洋; 胡菊; 张桂彦; 黄宇俊; 朱国飞; 崔宏志; 包小华

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21090402

考虑接触面影响的地下结构地震响应研究

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21090402

1. 珠海十字门中央商务区建设控股有限公司, 广东珠海 519000;
2. 深圳大学土木与交通工程学院, 滨海城市韧性基础设施教育部重点实验室, 广东深圳 518060

详细信息

作者简介:
于海洋,男,1985年出生,硕士研究生,674295830@qq.com。

通讯作者:
崔宏志,男,1974年出生,博士,教授,博士生导师,hongzhicui@163.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 86
- HTML全文浏览量: 16
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-09-04
- 网络出版日期: 2023-03-22

Research on Seismic Responses of Underground Structures Considering Influence of Contact Surfaces

1. Zhuhai Shizimen Central Business District Development Holdings Co., Ltd., Zhuhai 519000, China;
2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Key Laboratory for Resilient Infrastructures of Coastal Cities MOE, Shenzhen 518060, China

摘要

摘要: 针对可液化地层地下结构在地震作用期间和地震后的动力响应开展水土耦合有限元分析。计算采用基于有效应力的水土完全耦合有限单元-有限差分方法，嵌入能够准确反映土在循环交变荷载作用下动力行为的CM模型描述土体的交变移动特性，采用考虑结构体积效应的弹性梁和柱组合单元进行结构建模，并且设定土-结构界面节理单元；对比分析了在罕遇地震中土体的加速度响应、超静孔隙水压发展状况，地下结构的内力和震后地层固结沉降趋势。结果表明：地下结构在震后一定期间继续上浮，震后的位移发展明显大于地震期间位移发展，且待超静孔隙水压完全消散后，结构表现为整体沉降。
- 地下结构 /
- 地震响应 /
- 土-结构相互作用 /
- 结构内力 /
- 固结沉降
Abstract: A water-soil coupling finite element analysis for the dynamic response of underground structure in the liquefiable site during and after earthquakes was performed. In the calculation, the water-soil fully coupled finite element-finite difference method based on the effective stress theory and the CM model (the Cyclic Mobility model) accurately reflected the dynamic characterisitcs of soil under cyclic loads were adopted. Considering the structural volume effect, the hybrid elements composed of elastic beams and columns were used to construct the model of the station structure, and the joint elements at soil-structure interfaces were set. The acceleration response of soil during a rare earthquake, the development of excess pore water pressure, the internal force of the underground structure and the consolidation settlement after the earthquake were simulated and analyzed. The results showed that the underground structure continued to float up after the earthquake, and the displacement development after the earthquake was significantly greater than that during the earthquake. When the excess pore pressure almost completely dissipated, the structure settlement tended to be stable.
- underground structure /
- seismic response /
- soil-structure interaction /
- internal force of structure /
- consolidation settlement

HTML全文

参考文献(22)

[1]	GOODMAN R E, TAYLOR R L, BREKKE T L A. A model for the mechanics of jointed rock[J]. ASCE Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division Journal, 1968, 99(5):637-659.
[2]	DESAI C S, ZAMAN M M, LIGHTNER J G, et al. Thin-layer element for interfaces and joints[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1984, 8(1):19-43.
[3]	ZIENKIEWICZ O C, PANDE G N. Time-dependent multilaminate model of rocks:a numerical study of deformation and failure of rock masses[J]. International Journal for Numerical & Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2010, 1(3):219-247.
[4]	LIU S T, LI P Z, ZHANG W Y, et al. Experimental study and numerical simulation on dynamic soil-structure interaction under earthquake excitations[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 138.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106333.
[5]	刘光磊, 宋二祥, 刘华北, 等. 饱和砂土地层中隧道结构动力离心模型试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 29(8):2070-2076.
[6]	路德春, 王欣, 罗磊, 等. 土与结构接触特性对地下结构地震反应的影响研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2017, 37(2):177-186.
[7]	叶冠林. DBLEAVES手册[M]. 上海:上海交通大学出版社, 2013.
[8]	陈云敏, 韩超, 凌道盛, 等. ZJU400离心机研制及其振动台性能评价[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(12):1887-1894.
[9]	凌道盛, 郭恒, 蔡武军, 等. 地铁车站地震破坏离心机振动台模型试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2012, 46(12):2201-2209.
[10]	郭恒. 地铁车站地震响应离心机模型试验研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2012.
[11]	ZHANG F, YE B, NODA T, et al. Explanation of cyclic mobility of soils:approach by stress-induced anisotropy[J]. Soils & Foundations, 2011, 47(4):635-648.
[12]	ZHANG F, YE B, YE G L. Unified description of sand behavior[J]. Frontiers of Architecture & Civil Engineering in China, 2011, 5(2):121-150.
[13]	HASHIGUCHI K. Sub-loading surface model in unconventional plasticity[J]. International Journal of Solids & Structures, 1989, 25(8):917-945.
[14]	ASAOKA A. Super-loading yield surface concept for the saturated structured soils[C]//Proc European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering. 1998.
[15]	YE B, YE G L, ZHANG F, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation of repeated liquefaction-consolidation of sand[J]. Soils & Foundations, 2007, 47(3):547-558.
[16]	KHERADI H, YE B, NISHI H, et al. Optimum pattern of ground improvement for enhancing seismic resistance of existing box culvert buried in soft ground[J]. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology, 2017, 69:187-202.
[17]	Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. FLAC3D, Fast Lagrangian analysis of continua in 3 dimensions, version 3.0, user's manual[M]. Minneapolis:Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., 2005.
[18]	BAO X H, XIA Z F, et al. Numerical analysis on the seismic behavior of a large metro subway tunnel in liquefiable ground[J]. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology, 2017, 66:91-106.
[19]	MEHRZAD B, HADDAD A, JAFARIAN Y. Centrifuge and numerical models to investigate liquefaction-induced response of shallow foundations with different contact pressures[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 14(2):117-131.
[20]	LIU H B, SONG E X. Seismic response of large underground structures in liquefiable soils subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations[J]. Computers & Geotechnics, 2005, 32(4):223-244.
[21]	CHEN G X, CHEN S, ZUO X, et al. Shaking-table tests and numerical simulations on a subway structure in soft soil[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 76(S1):13-28.
[22]	CHEN S, ZHUANG H Y, QUAN D Z, et al. Shaking table test on the seismic response of large-scale subway station in a loess site:a case study[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 123:173-184.