Experimental Research on Conversion for Q-s Curves of Self-Anchored Test Piles and Construction of Conversion Formulas
-
摘要: 通过室内模型试验,研究了"顶拉桩" "顶压无土桩" "顶压有土桩"和"自锚试桩"的荷载传递及位移变化规律。研究表明:"顶拉桩"呈现突然破坏,"顶压无土桩"呈现延时破坏;"顶压有土桩"的Q-s曲线由线性、非线性两个阶段构成;"自锚试桩"上段桩Q-s曲线具有"顶拉桩"的属性,下段桩具有"顶压有土桩"的属性。对比"顶压无土桩"与"顶压有土桩"的荷载传递规律,发现桩侧摩阻力先于桩端阻力发挥。对"顶压有土桩"来说,单桩承载力经过两个发挥阶段:第一阶段为桩侧摩阻力发挥阶段,近似对应Q-s曲线上的线性阶段;第二阶段为桩端阻力发挥阶段,近似对应Q-s曲线上的非线性阶段。据此提出"自锚试桩"Q-s曲线向"顶压有土桩"Q-s曲线的两段转换法。经与模型桩静载荷试验以及原位桩静载荷试验对比,经两段转换法转换后,转换的自锚试桩的Q-s曲线高度吻合"顶压有土桩"的Q-s曲线,为"自锚试桩"的工程应用,提供了可靠的Q-s曲线转换方法。Abstract: The laws for load transfer and displacement of top-uplift piles, top-down piles without soil at bottoms, top-down piles with soil at bottoms and self-anchored test piles were studied by model tests in the laboratory. The results showed that Q-s curves for top-uplift piles presented a sudden drop and the curves of top-down piles without soil at bottoms prensted a slow drop. The Q-s curves of top-down piles with soil at bottoms consists of two stages, which were linear stages and nonlinear stages. The Q-s curves for the upper segment of self-anchoring test piles were of properties of top-uplift piles, while the curves for the lower segment were of properties of top-down piles with soil at bottoms. Comparing the load transfer law of top-down piles without soil at bottoms and top-down piles with soil at bottoms, it was found that the friction resistance reached to the ultimate value before the pile tip resistance. For top-down piles with soil at bottoms, the bearing capacity of single piles went through two stages. The first stage was the development stage of lateral friction resistance, which approximately corresponded to the linear stage of Q-s curves. The second stage was the development stage of pile tip resistance, which approximately corresponded to the nonlinear stage of Q-s curves. Based on the above analysis, a two-stage conversion method from Q-s curves of self-anchoring test piles to Q-s curves of top-down piles with soil at bottoms was proposed. Compared with the results of static load tests for model piles and in situ piles, the converted Q-s curves of self-anchoring test piles were highly consistent with Q-s curves of top-down piles with soil at bottoms after being conversed by the two-stage conversion method, which provided a reliable conversion method of Q-s curves for the engineering application of self-anchored test piles.
-
Key words:
- self-anchored test pile /
- load-displacement curve /
- load transfer /
- shaft resistance /
- tip resistance
-
[1] TAN Y, LIN G M. Comprehensive load test on prestressed concrete piles in alluvial clays and marl in savannah, georgia[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2014, 28(1):178-190. [2] BOHN C, LOPES DOS SANTOS A, FRANK R. Development of axial pile load transfer curves based on instrumented load tests[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2017, 143(1). https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001579. [3] 田欣.静载荷试验中压重平台引起的地表位移分析[J].路基工程, 2018(6):132-136. [4] 袁从华, 章光.大吨位堆载法对单桩承载力试验的影响[J].岩土力学, 1997, 18(1):78-83. [5] 卢坤林, 杨扬.锚桩对静载荷试验成果的影响分析[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 30(7):892-895. [6] ZHANG X F, NI Y S, SONG C X. Study on large tonnage pile foundation load test system and field test of long rock-socketed pile[J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2020, 21(6):565-570. [7] HE H T, LI J Y, LIN Y G. A large-scale field test on sand compaction piles including three-dimensional numerical analysis[J]. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 2020, 62(4):296-306. [8] 叶建辉, 郑韶鹏, 谢志招, 等. 26000kN垂直静载荷试验设计方案及成果初探[J].水文地质工程地质, 1999(4):13-15. [9] 朱晓伟.超大吨位静载试验的防倾覆措施[J].铁道建筑技术, 2008(4):66-68. [10] 李翔宇, 盛志强, 陈立根, 等.南京金茂广场二期超大吨位基桩静载荷试验研究[J].建筑科学, 2020, 36(增刊):261-266. [11] 安康, 刘晔, 臧明飞, 等.锚桩法在超高吨位钻孔灌注桩静载荷试验中的应用[J].江苏建筑, 2020(2):78-81.. [12] 范燕红, 刘泳钢, 任鹏.桩承载力自平衡法与桩传统静载试验法对比试验研究[J].建筑科学, 2017, 33(3):75-81. [13] CHERIAN A. Assessment of pile capacity using bidirectional static load test[J]. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-020-00447-x. [14] HASAN R, YU X B, ABU-FARSAKH M.Extrapolation of o-cell drilled shaft tests for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) calibration[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2021, 16(2):491-506. [15] 周俊鹏, 黄雪峰, 刘自龙, 等.黄土地基中微型抗压与抗拔桩对比试验研究[J].水利与建筑工程学报, 2017, 15(1):121-125. [16] 王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 等.浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2019, 40(4):1498-1506. [17] 华南理工大学, 浙江大学, 湖南大学.基础工程[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2019. [18] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑基桩自平衡静载试验技术规程:JGJ/T 403-2017[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2017. 期刊类型引用(6)
1. 户梦瑶,吉云鹏,胡红松,高毅超. 环向均匀脱空对方钢管混凝土柱轴压受力性能的影响. 实验力学. 2025(01): 80-90 . 百度学术
2. 姜磊,刘永健,周绪红,陈宝春,牟廷敏,刘君平,陈洪明. 钢管混凝土组合结构桥梁设计原理与技术发展综述. 中国公路学报. 2025(03): 278-302 . 百度学术
3. 姜海波,李佳航,李军生,陈振侃,叶嘉政. 自密实微膨胀混凝土填充圆钢管约束钢筋混凝土柱轴压性能试验研究. 工业建筑. 2023(02): 22-28+21 . 本站查看
4. 束永龙,孙益轩,杨亦芃,程帅,贾思豪. 基于物联网的钢管混凝土脱空缺陷智能检测技术研究. 工程与建设. 2021(06): 1203-1205 . 百度学术
5. 陆征然,王倩倩. 基于ABAQUS的缺陷钢管混凝土拱桥动力特性分析. 科技和产业. 2020(10): 223-228 . 百度学术
6. 程晨,李鲲,范霏然,陈娟,杜国锋. 内置空心钢球的圆截面钢管混凝土柱抗震性能试验. 世界地震工程. 2020(04): 42-52 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(1)
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 100
- HTML全文浏览量: 17
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 7