STUDY OF WATER AND EARTH PRESSURE MODES ON SHIELD TUNNELS IN WATER-RICH DIORITE STRATA
-
摘要: 迄今,在复杂的地质环境下,盾构隧道所受的水土压力尚难以精确计算。以济南地铁R2线为依托工程,选取2个代表性断面上实测的作用在衬砌结构上的水土压力,分析处于不同地质环境下掘进施工时盾构隧道管片水土压力的变化规律和分布特征。结果表明:1)在软硬不均的复合地层中,由于各土层物理力学性能的差异,盾构掘进约20环管片的距离后,测点处的水土压力才能基本稳定;2)对于正常固结的软黏土或粉质黏土,当覆土厚度大于2.5D(D为管片外径)时,已经产生土拱效应,采用Terzaghi松动土压力法计算较为合理。而对于覆土厚度小于1.5D的隧道来说,采用全土柱法较为合适;3)在上软下硬土层中,盾构隧道衬砌结构两侧的荷载并不对称,修正惯用法的荷载模式夸大了基底反力;4)不同埋深的两处断面的实测水压力值与理论静止水压力值基本相近。Abstract: In the complex geological environment, it is difficult to accurately calculate the water and earth pressure on shield tunnels. Based on the Jinan Metro line R2 as research basis, two representative sections were selected to measure the water and earth pressure on the lining structure, the evolution and distribution characteristics of water and earth pressure on the shield tunnel segments in different geological environments were analyzed. The results showed:1) In soft and hard nonuniform composite strata, due to differences in the physical and mechanical properties between strata, the water and earth pressure on measured sections would gradually kept it stable after being tunnelled about 20 shield segments away. 2) For normal consolidated soft clay or silty clay, when the thickness of the overlaying soil was greater than 2.5D (D was the outer diameter of the segmenting), the soil arching effect had already occurred, and the calculation method for loose earth pressure proposed by Terzaghi was more reasonable. For a tunnel with a thickness of less than 1.5D, the full soil column method was more appropriate.3) In a stratum with softer uppersoil and harder subsoil, the loads on both sides of the shield tunnel were asymmetrical, and the calculation mode of loads by the conventional correction method exaggerated the base reaction. 4) The measured water pressure on the two sections was generally close to the theoretical static water pressure.
-
Key words:
- shield tunnel /
- complex stratum /
- field measurement /
- water and soil pressure
-
[1] TAKANO Y H. Guidelines for the Design of Shield Tunnel Lining[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2000, 15(3):303-331. [2] 朱合华, 崔茂玉, 杨金松.盾构衬砌管片的设计模型与荷载分布的研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2000(2):190-194. [3] 侯学渊.隧道设计模型、理论与试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1984(3):35-43. [4] MASHIMO H, ISHIMURA T. Evaluation of the Load on Shield Tunnel Lining in Gravel[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2003, 18(2):233-241. [5] 李雪, 周顺华, 宫全美, 等.大断面深埋高水压地铁盾构隧道周边土压力作用模式评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(5):1415-1420, 1427. [6] OHTA H, TAKEUCHI T, NISHIWAKI Y, et al. Performance of Linings for Shield Driven Tunnels:A Survey on Japanese Shield Tunneling[C]//Proceedings of the International Symposium on Underground Construction in Soft Ground. FUJITA K, KUSAKABA O. Underground Construction in Soft Ground. 1994:367-374. [7] KOYAMA Y. Present Status and Technology of Shield Tunneling Method in Japan[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2003, 18(2):367-374. [8] 张恒, 陈寿根, 陈亮.软硬不均地层盾构隧道管片力学行为研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2012(8):83-86, 95. [9] 雷凯, 莫海鸿, 陈俊生, 等.上软下硬复合地层中盾构隧道管片受力变形性态研究[J]. 广东土木与建筑, 2016, 23(增刊1):52-56. [10] 王道远, 郝士华.基于实测数据统计的盾构隧道土压力分布规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018, 55(3):46-53. [11] 何平, 陈峥, 王占生, 等.盾构管片设计中静止土压力系数选取的探讨[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2019, 36(11):92-98. [12] 黄戡, 孙逸玮, 赵磊, 等.盾构穿越上软下硬复合地层时的管片力学特性[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 51(5):1371-1383. [13] 刘宏达, 杨天亮, 张冬梅.基于离散元分析的砂土深埋盾构隧道土压力计算方法[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2020, 2(2):31-40. [14] 黄梅, 刘国民.浅覆土条件下盾构隧道同步注浆现场试验研究[J]. 公路, 2020, 65(8):390-395. [15] 李策, 王士民, 王承震, 等.基于实测内力的大直径水下盾构隧道荷载反演分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2020, 53(3):103-113. [16] 章定文, 刘志祥, 沈国根, 等.超大直径浅埋盾构隧道土压力实测分析及其计算方法适用性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(增刊1):91-98. [17] 张彬然, 周中, 高文渊, 等.水下盾构隧道施工全过程衬砌受力现场监测试验研究[J]. 施工技术, 2019, 48(7):94-97.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 119
- HTML全文浏览量: 10
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0