RESEARCH ON FATIGUE PERFORMANCES OF STEEL BRIDGE DECKS WITH OPEN-SHAPED LONGITUDIRAL RIBS
-
摘要: 为研究开口纵肋钢桥面板的疲劳性能,依托云南楚大高速公路项目,以疲劳开裂问题最为突出的纵肋与顶板焊接细节和纵肋与横隔板交叉构造细节为研究对象,对开口纵肋钢桥面板的疲劳性能及其关键影响因素进行了系统研究。研究结果表明:纵肋与顶板焊接细节的纵向影响线长度主要在关注构造细节相邻的两个横隔板之间,纵肋与横隔板交叉构造细节的纵向影响线长度主要在关注构造细节相邻的两跨范围内;在纵向移动荷载作用下顶板焊趾开裂模式(C1)的热点应力幅值最大,为125.8 MPa,当铺设8 cm厚的混凝土现浇层之后顶板焊趾开裂模式的热点应力幅值降为10.7 MPa,降幅为91.5%;纵肋高度的变化对开口纵肋钢桥面板各疲劳开裂模式的应力幅值无显著影响,增加纵肋间距将显著增大横隔板焊趾开裂模式(C4)的应力幅值;带混凝土现浇层的开口纵肋钢桥面板各开裂模式的应力幅值均较低,疲劳开裂风险较小。Abstract: In order to research the fatigue performance of steel bridge deck with open-shaped longitudinal ribs, the rib-to-deck welded joint and rib-to-diaphragm welded joint were considered as research objects, based on the Yunnan Chuda Expressway project, the fatigue performance and key influencing factors of steel bridge decks with open-shaped longitudinal ribs were systematically studied. The results indicated that the length of the longitudinal influence line of rib-to-deck welded joint was mainly between the two adjacent diaphragms of the structural details. The length of the longitudinal influence line of rib-to-diaphragm welded joint was mainly within the two adjacent spans of the structural details. The hot-spot stress amplitude of the deck toe cracking mode(C1) was the largest under the longitudinal moving load, which was 125.8 MPa. After laying an 8 cm thick cast-in-situ concrete layer, the hot-spot stress amplitude of the deck toe cracking mode was reduced to 10.7 MPa, a reduction of 91.5%. The change of the rib height had no significant effect on the stress amplitude of each fatigue cracking mode of the steel bridge decks with open-shaped longitudinal ribs. Increasing the rib spacing would significantly increase the stress amplitude of the diaphragm toe cracking mode(C4). The stress amplitude of each cracking mode of the steel bridge deck with open-shaped longitudinal ribs and cast-in-situ concrete layer was at a low level, the risk of fatigue cracking was small.
-
[1] 张清华,卜一之,李乔.正交异性钢桥面板疲劳问题的研究进展[J].中国公路学报,2017,30(3):14-30,39. [2] 张清华,李俊,郭亚文,等.正交异性钢桥面板结构体系的疲劳破坏模式和抗力评估[J].土木工程学报,2019,52(1):71-81. [3] ZHANG S H,SHAO X D,Cao J H,et al.Fatigue Performance of a Lightweight Composite Bridge Deck with Open Ribs[J].Journal of Bridge Engineering,2016,21(7):DOI:10.1061/(ASCE) BE.1943-5592.0000905. [4] 吉伯海,袁周致远.钢箱梁疲劳开裂维护研究现状[J].工业建筑,2017,47(5):1-5,11. [5] 王春生,翟慕赛,HOUANKPO T.正交异性钢桥面板典型细节疲劳强度研究[J].工程力学,2020,37(8):102-111. [6] 张清华,崔闯,卜一之,等.正交异性钢桥面板足尺节段疲劳模型试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2015,48(4):72-83. [7] KOLSTEIN M H.Fatigue Classification of Welded Joints in Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks[D].Delft:Delft University of Technology,2007. [8] YOKOZEKI K,MIKI C.Fatigue Evaluation for Longitudinal-to-Transverse Rib Connection of Orthotropic Steel Deck by Using Structural Hot Spot Stress[J].Welding in the World,2016,60(1):83-92. [9] SIM H B,UANG C M,SIKORSKY C.Effects of Fabrication Procedures on Fatigue Resistance of Welded Joints in Steel Orthotropic Decks[J].Journal of Bridge Engineering,2009,14(5):366-373. [10] 周绪红,朋茜,秦凤江,等.钢桥面板顶板与纵肋连接焊根位置疲劳损伤特征[J].交通运输工程学报,2018,18(1):1-12. [11] 朋茜,周绪红,狄谨,等.钢桥面板纵肋与横隔板连接位置疲劳损伤特征[J].中国公路学报,2018,31(11):78-90. [12] 何翠颖,傅中秋,吉伯海,等.钢桥面板横隔板弧形缺口位置疲劳受力分析[J].工业建筑,2018,48(10):22-27,114. [13] 韩冰,蒲黔辉,施洲.正交异性钢桥面板足尺模型疲劳试验研究[J].桥梁建设,2016,46(4):61-66. [14] 徐捷,吉伯海,姚悦,等.钢桥面板面外变形下顶板与U肋连接焊缝应力特征[J].工业建筑,2018,48(10):34-39.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 114
- HTML全文浏览量: 18
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0