RESEARCH ON PROPAGATION CHARACTERISTICS OF FATIGUE CRACK FOR STEEL BRIDGE DECKS WITH OPEN-SHAPED LONGITUDINAL RIBS
-
摘要: 为研究开口纵肋钢桥面板的疲劳裂纹扩展特性,依托云南楚大高速公路项目,以钢桥面板疲劳开裂问题最为突出的纵肋与顶板焊接细节和纵肋与横隔板交叉构造细节为研究对象,对开口纵肋钢桥面板的疲劳裂纹扩展特性及优化设计进行研究。研究结果表明:在疲劳裂纹扩展初期四种典型疲劳开裂模式的裂纹扩展速率均随着裂纹深度的增加而不断增大,当裂纹深度达到4 mm后,开裂模式C1、C2和C3的疲劳裂纹扩展速率达到其峰值,开裂模式C4的裂纹扩展速率在整个过程都随着裂纹深度的增加而不断增大;开口纵肋钢桥面板的疲劳寿命由开裂模式C1和C4控制;增加顶板厚度和铺设混凝土现浇层均可显著降低开口纵肋钢桥面板的等效应力强度因子幅值,但是铺设混凝土现浇层对于钢桥面板疲劳性能的影响更加显著;建议通过铺设混凝土现浇层的方式提升钢桥面板的疲劳性能。Abstract: In order to research propagation characteristics of fatigue crack for steel bridge decks with open-shaped longitudinal-ribs, the rib-to-deck welded joint and rib-to-diaphragm welded joint were considered as research objects, based on the Yunnan Chuda Expressway Project. The fatigue crack propagation characteristics and optimal design of steel bridge decks with open-shaped longitndinal ribs were systematically studied. The results indicated that the four typical fatigue cracking modes all increased with the increase of crack depth, in the early stage of fatigue crack propagation. When the crack depth reached 4 mm, the fatigue crack growth rates of cracking modes C1, C2 and C3 reached their peaks, and the crack growth rate of the cracking mode C4 increased continuously with the increase of the crack depth throughout the process. The fatigue life of the steel bridge deck with open-shaped longitudinal ribs was controlled by the cracking mode C1 and C4. Increasing the thickness of the deck and laying a concrete cast-in-situ layer could significantly reduce the equivalent stress intensity factor amplitude of the steel bridge deck, but the laying of the cast-in-situ concrete layer had a more significant impact on the fatigue performance of the steel bridge deck. It was recommended to improve the fatigue performance of steel bridge decks by laying cast-in-situ concrete layers.
-
[1] 张清华,卜一之,李乔.正交异性钢桥面板疲劳问题的研究进展[J].中国公路学报,2017,30(3):14-30,39. [2] 王益逊,吉伯海,傅中秋,等.顶板与竖向加劲肋围焊端部开裂焊合修复技术[J].工业建筑,2018,48(10):52-57,9. [3] 王本劲,DE BACKER H,陈艾荣.正交异性钢桥面板裂纹扩展的均质化方法[J].中国公路学报,2017,30(3):113-120. [4] ZHANG S H,SHAO X D,CAO J H,et al.Fatigue Performance of a Lightweight Composite Bridge Deck with Open Ribs[J].Journal of Bridge Engineering,2016,21(7).https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) BE.1943-5592.0000905. [5] International Institute of Welding.Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components:XIII-2151r4-07/XV-1254r4-07[S].Switzerland:Springer International Publishing,2016. [6] British Standards Institution.Guide to Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures:BS 7910:2019[S].London:BSI Standards Limited,2019. [7] RADAJ D,SONSINO C M,FRICKE W.Fatigue Assessment of Welded Joints by Local Approaches[M].Cambridge:Woodhead Publishing,2006. [8] 孙志雄.焊接断裂力学[M].西安:西北工业大学出版社.1990. [9] British Standards Institution.Guide to Fatigue Design and Assessment of Steel Products:BS 7608:2014+A1:2015[S].London:BSI Standards Limited,2015. [10] NUISMER R J.An Energy Release Rate Criterion for Mixed Mode Fracture[J].International Journal of Fracture,1975,11(2):245-250. [11] PARIS P C,EDORGAN F.A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws[J].Journal of Basic Engineering,1963,85(4):528-534. [12] 刘益铭,张清华,崔闯,等.正交异性钢桥面板三维疲劳裂纹扩展数值模拟方法[J].中国公路学报,2016,29(7):89-95. [13] TORU F,HIDETAKA M,MASAHUMI H,et al.Study on Fatigue Damage Mechanism of a Special Highway Steel Bridge Deck and Improvement of The Fatigue Durability by Structural Composition with Concrete[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2010,56A:1312-1321. [14] YA S,YAMADA K.Fatigue Durability Evaluation of Trough to Deck Plate Welded Joint of Orthotropic Steel Deck[J].Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering,2008,64(3):603-616. [15] 张清华,郭亚文,李俊,等.钢桥面板纵肋双面焊构造疲劳裂纹扩展特性研究[J].中国公路学报,2019,32(7):49-56,110. [16] 吉伯海,袁周致远.钢箱梁疲劳开裂维护研究现状[J].工业建筑,2017,47(5):1-5,11. [17] 彭勃,邵旭东.闭口肋轻型组合桥面板疲劳性能研究[J].土木工程学报,2017,50(4):89-96.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 108
- HTML全文浏览量: 18
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0