高密度街区建筑附属开放空间公共性评价研究

梁锐; 梁挚呈; 江海燕; 邱韵烨

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21022002

高密度街区建筑附属开放空间公共性评价研究

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21022002

梁锐^1,2,
梁挚呈^1,2,
江海燕^1,2, ,,
邱韵烨¹

1. 广东工业大学建筑与城市规划学院, 广州 510090;
2. 广东工业大学景观规划与生态修复研究中心, 广州 510090

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目（51478124）；广东省自然科学基金面上项目（2021A1515010894）。

详细信息

作者简介:
梁锐,男,1969年出生,硕士,讲师。

通讯作者:
江海燕,女,1973年出生,博士,教授,jianghy2002@163.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 174
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-02-20
- 网络出版日期: 2021-11-10
- 刊出日期: 2021-11-10

RESEARCH ON PUBLICNESS EVALUATION OF BUILDING ATTACHED OPEN SPACES IN HIGH-DENSITY BLOCKES

1. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510090, China;
2. Landscape Planning and Ecological Restoration Research Center, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510090, China

摘要

摘要: 在高密度街区提供能够满足人们更高品质生活的公共开放空间，是新时期城市建设和管理的重要任务和挑战，建立开放空间公共性评价方法是快速、科学识别其质量高低及其影响因素的重要途径。选取广州市珠江新城核心区和纽约曼哈顿约克维尔街区为研究对象，采用层次分析法建立建筑附属开放空间（AOS）公共性评价体系、计算指标权重、建立评价标准。结果表明：1）六项评价指标重要性程度从大到小依次为：可达时间、休憩设施、开放程度、视觉感受、面积大小、监控影响；2）总体上曼哈顿约克维尔的公共性比珠江新城核心区略强，在单项指标上各有优劣。补充和发展了现有AOS公共性评价方法，该方法适用于各类城市街区AOS公共性质量比较，同时也能科学、快速识别影响AOS单项因子，为城市街区规划设计和建设管理提供优化方向和依据。
- 城市公共空间 /
- 建筑附属开放空间 /
- 公共性评价 /
- 层次分析法
Abstract: Providing public open space that can satisfy people's life needs with higher quality in high-density urban blocks is an important task and challenge for urban construction and management in the new era. The establishment of a method for evaluating the publicness of open space is an important way to quickly and scientifically identify the quality and influencing factors of open space. The core area of Guangzhou Pearl River New Town and Manhattan's Yorkville, New York were taken as the research objects, and the analytic hierarchy process was used to establish the publicity evaluation system of the building attached open space (AOS), the index weight was calculated, and the evaluation standard was established. The results showed that: 1)the importance of the six evaluation indicators should be ranked as: access time> recreational facilities> degree of openness> visual perception> spatial scale> monitoring impact; 2)in general, Manhattan’s Yorkville showed more public than the core area of Guangzhou Pearl River New Town slightly; and each had its own advantages and disadvantages in individual indicators. This research has supplemented and developed the existing AOS publicness evaluation method, which is suitable for the comparison of the publicity quality of various urban blocks. At the same time, it can also scientifically and quickly identify the individual factors that affect AOS, and provide information for planning, design and construction management of urban block.
- urban public space /
- attached open space /
- publicness evaluation /
- analytic hierarchy process

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]	金云峰,陈栋菲,王淳淳,等.公园城市思想下的城市公共开放空间内生活力营造途径探究:以上海徐汇滨水空间更新为例[J].中国城市林业,2019,17(5):52-56 ,62.
[2]	江海燕,胡峰,刘为,等.私有公共空间的研究进展及其对附属绿地公共化的启示[J].城市发展研究,2020,27(11):7-11.
[3]	江海燕,伍雯晶,蔡云楠.开放空间的概念界定和分类[J].城市发展研究,2016,23(4):21-26.
[4]	杨晓春,司马晓,洪涛.城市公共开放空间系统规划方法初探:以深圳为例[J]. 规划师, 2008, 24(6):24-27.
[5]	罗巧灵,于洋,张明.宜居城市公共空间规划建设新思路[J].规划师,2012,28(6):28-32.
[6]	周理.广州珠江新城核心区建筑公众空间的可持续设计管控策略研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2018.
[7]	徐晶青,徐梦阳.地块开敞空间的布局效率与优化:以上海八个轨交商业地块为例[J].时代建筑,2017(5):74-79.
[8]	周聪惠,金云峰."精细化"理念下的城市绿地复合型分类框架建构与规划应用[J].城市发展研究,2014(11):118-124.
[9]	于洋.纽约市区划条例的百年流变(1916-2016):以私有公共空间建设为例[J]. 国际城市规划,2016,31(2):98-109.
[10]	黄大田.利用非强制型城市设计引导手法改善城市环境:浅析美、日两国的经验,兼论我国借鉴的可行性[J].城市规划,1999(6):40-43.
[11]	YANG Y. Urban Regime and POSPD Development in Hong Kong[D].Hong Kong:Hong Kong University,2013.
[12]	SARAH S. The "Publicization" of PrivateSpace[J]. Iowa Law Review,2018,103:1093-1153.
[13]	NÉMETH J.Defining a Public:The Management of Privately Owned Public Space[J].Urban Studies,2009,46(11):2463-2490.
[14]	王一民,陈洁.国外城市公共空间公共性评价研究及其对中国的借鉴和启示[J].城市规划学刊,2016(6):72-82.
[15]	徐磊青,言语.公共空间的公共性评估模型评述[J].新建筑,2016(1):4-9.
[16]	SMITH S G.Dispersing the Crowd:Bonus Plazas and the Creation of Public Space[J].Urban Affairs Review,2008,43(3):325-351.
[17]	NÉMETH J, STEPHEN S.The Privatization of Public Space-Modeling and Measuring Publicness[J].Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design, 2011, 38:5-23.
[18]	HEEYEUN Y,SUMEETA S.Are They Well Situated?Spatial Analysis of Privately Owned Public Space, Manhattan, New York City[J].Urban Affair Review,2015,51(3):358-380.
[19]	言语,徐磊青.地块公共空间供应系数与效用研究:以上海14个轨交地块为例[J].时代建筑,2017(5):80-87.
[20]	AKKAR M. The Changing "Publicness" of Contemporary Public Space:a Case Study of the Grey's Monument Area,Newcastle upon Tyne[J].Urban Design International,2005,10(2):95-114.
[21]	WAI A T P, NITIVATTANANON V, KIM S M. Multi-Stakeholder and Multi-Benefit Approaches for Enhanced Utilization of Public Open Spaces in Mandalay City, Myanmar[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society,2018,37:323-335.