腹板开孔冷弯薄壁卷边槽钢轴压柱试验及设计方法

姚行友; 尹佳文; 郭彦利

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG2010908

腹板开孔冷弯薄壁卷边槽钢轴压柱试验及设计方法

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG2010908

1. 南昌工程学院土木与建筑工程学院, 南昌 330099;
2. 南昌工程学院, 江西省水利土木工程基础设施安全重点实验室, 南昌 330099

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目（51868049）；江西省自然科学基金项目（20181BAB206040）；江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目（GJJ180932，GJJ170983）。

详细信息

作者简介:
姚行友,男,1978年出生,博士,副教授。电子信箱:yaoxingyoujd@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 119
- HTML全文浏览量: 19
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-10-09
- 网络出版日期: 2021-11-11

AXIAL COMPRESSION TESTS AND THE DESIGN METHOD FOR COLD-FORMED THIN-WALLED LIPPED CHANNEL COLUMNS WITH WEB OPENINGS

1. School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China;
2. Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering Infrastructure Security, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究腹板开孔冷弯薄壁卷边槽钢轴压柱的整体稳定性和承载力设计方法，对不同截面的腹板、开圆或矩形孔不同开孔尺寸的冷弯薄壁卷边槽钢柱进行了轴压承载力试验，其中未开孔、开圆孔、开矩形孔试件分别为6，18，18个，每个开孔构件在腹板开孔3个，圆孔直径为0.3、0.5、0.7倍腹板高度，矩形孔高为0.2、0.4、0.6倍腹板高度，孔长为孔高的2倍。试验结果表明：构件宽厚比较小易发生弯扭失稳，而宽厚比较大构件易发生局部屈曲、畸变屈曲和整体屈曲；随着开孔尺寸的增大，腹板发生局部屈曲时荷载提高；与未开孔构件相比，开孔柱的承载力有所降低，且随着开孔尺寸的增大而逐渐降低。采用ABAQUS有限元程序对试件进行了模拟分析，模拟结果与试验结果吻合良好，表明采用有限元分析此类开孔构件是准确和可行的。进而开展了有限元参数分析，对此类构件的弹性整体屈曲临界应力计算式进行修正。
- 冷弯薄壁型钢 /
- 腹板开孔 /
- 轴压构件 /
- 整体屈曲 /
- 相关屈曲
Abstract: To sutdy the global buckling property of cold-formed thin-walled lipped channel columns with web openings and the calculated method of the overall stability and loading capacity for the compressive columns, based on the effective width method, the tests of axial compression for the cold-formed thin-walled lipped channel columns were conducted, which had different cross sections of webs, circular or rectangular web openings, and opening sizes.There were 6 specimens without openings, 18 specimens with circular openings, and 18 specimens with rectangular openings. The diameters of normalized circular openings were 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 times web height. The heights of normalized rectangular openings were 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 times web height. The ratios of length-to-width of rectangular opening were 2. The test results showed that the specimens with smaller ratios of width-to-thickness were prone to flexural-torsional buckling, whlie the specimens with larger ratios of width-to-thickness were controlled by local interaction buckling, distortional and global buckling. The capacity of local buckling increased with the increase of the normalized hole sizes. Compared with the specimens without openings, the ultimate capcity of the specimens with openings decreased slightly.Then the experiments were simulated by finite element software ABAQUS. The simulation results showed good agreement with the test results which indicated the finite element method could analyze the specimens with web openings accurately and feasibly. Furthermore, the formula to predicte the elastic global buckling critical stress was revised based on parameter analysis of specimens with web openings by FEM.
- cold-formed thin-walled steel /
- web opening /
- axial compressed member /
- global buckling /
- interactive buckling

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	ORTIZ-COLBERG R A. The Load Carrying Capacity of Perforated Cold-Formed Steel Columns[D]. New York:Cornell University, 1981.
[2]	SIVAKUMARAN K S. Load Capacity of Uniformly Compressed Cold-Formed Steel Section with Punched Web[J]. Canada Journal of Civil Engineering, 1987, 14(4):550-558.
[3]	ABDEL-RAHMAN N. Cold-Formed Steel Compression Members with Perforations[D]. Hamilton, Ontario:McMaster University, 1997.
[4]	MOEN C D, SCHAFER B W. Experiments on Cold-Formed Steel Columns with Holes[J]. Thin-Walled Structure, 2008, 46:1164-1182.
[5]	MOEN C D, SCHAFER B W. Elastic Buckling of Cold-Formed Steel Columns and Beams with Holes[J]. Engineering Structure, 2009, 31(12):2812-2824.
[6]	MOEN C D, SCHAFER B W. Direct Strength Method for Design of Cold-Formed Steel Columns with Holes[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 137(5):559-570.
[7]	LUE M, CHUNG P, LIU J, et al. The Compressive Strength of Slender C-Shaped Cold-Formed Steel Members with Web Openings[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2009, 9(3):231-240.
[8]	何保康, 赵桂萍. 冷弯薄壁卷边槽钢开孔腹板屈曲性能分析[J]. 西安冶金建筑学院学报, 1989, 21(1):1-9.
[9]	姚永红, 武振宇, 成博, 等. 开孔冷弯薄壁卷边槽钢柱轴压性能的试验研究[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(9):61-67.
[10]	姚行友, 郭彦利, 柳亚华, 等. 腹板开孔冷弯卷边槽钢轴压构件畸变屈曲分析[J]. 工业建筑, 2020, 50(1):170-177.
[11]	American Iron and Sfeel Insifitute.North American Specification for the Design of Cold-formed Steel Structural Members:AISI S100-16[S]. Washington D C:American Iron and Steel Institute, 2016.
[12]	全国钢标准化技术委员会.金属材料拉伸试验第一部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228.1-2010[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2011.
[13]	宋晓庆.开孔冷弯薄壁型钢构件局部屈曲性能与设计方法研究[D]. 南昌:南昌工程学院, 2020.