Research on Performance-Based Shock-Absorbing Reinforcement of a High-Rise SRC Frame Structure
-
摘要: 以天津市津南区某医院住院用房加固项目为工程背景,基于性能化的减震控制目标,采用三种消能减震加固方案,即方案1(防屈曲支撑加固)、方案2(黏滞阻尼器加固)及方案3(防屈曲支撑+黏滞阻尼器加固),利用SAUSAGE软件对原结构与三种加固结构进行时程分析,并对比三种消能减震加固方案在高层结构中的减震效果。结果表明:多遇地震下采用方案2加固结构,减震效果最好;在罕遇地震作用下,方案1和方案3均优于方案2;采用方案2加固该结构能够达到性能3的减震目标,但不能满足该建筑在罕遇地震下的不间断运行的要求,采用方案1和方案3加固结构均能达到性能2的减震目标,但是结合对结构弱轴方向顶点位移的控制可以看出方案3加固效果要优于方案1。Abstract: The hospital building reinforcement project in Jinnan District of Tianjin was taken as the engineering background in this study. Based on the performance-based seismic reduction control objectives, three reinforcement schemes of energy dissipation and seismic reduction were adopted, namely scheme 1 (buckling restrained brace), scheme 2 (viscous damper) and scheme 3 (buckling restrained brace + viscous damper). The damping effects of the three reinforcement schemes of energy dissipating and seismic reduction in high-rise structures were compared in according to the time-history analysis results of SAUSAGE software. The study showed that:under the action of frequently occurred earthquakes, using scheme 2 to strengthen the structure had the best damping effect; under the action of rarely occurred earthquakes, schemes 1 and 3 were better than scheme 2; using scheme 2 to reinforce the structure could achieve the damping target of performance 3, but could not meet the requirements of the building's uninterrupted operation under rarely occurred earthquake. The use of scheme 1 and scheme 3 to strengthen the structure could achieve the seismic reduction target of performance 2. As far as the control of the vertex displacement of the weak axis of the structure, the reinforcement effect of scheme 3 was better than scheme 1.
-
Key words:
- high-rise structure /
- SRC frame /
- performance-based /
- shock-absorbing /
- seismic reinforcement
-
[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010. [2] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑消能减震技术规程:JGJ 297-2013[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2013. [3] 李英民,刘建伟,周自强.基于性能的抗震加固方法在框架结构中的应用[J].建筑结构,2012,42(7):88-92. [4] 李霆,王小南,范华冰,等. 武汉保利广场联合减震连体高层结构设计[J].建筑结构,2012,42(12):1-7,25. [5] 李霆,王小南,黄银燊,等. 武汉保利广场联合减震连体高层抗震性能研究[J].建筑结构,2012,42(12):8-12,31. [6] HAMDY A E,MOSTAFA R,FOZEYA O A. Upgrading the seismic capacity of existing RC buildings using buckling restrained braces[J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal,2017,56(2):251-262. [7] ALEJANDRO M,JORGE N. Comparison between a traditionally retrofitted industrial building and an alternative solution using BRBs[J]. Key Engineering Materials,2018(763):1025-1032. [8] 代晓艳,陈生林,舒蓉.BRB在既有单跨多层混凝土框架结构加固设计中的应用[J].四川建筑科学研究,2020,46(4):16-24. [9] 周云,卢德辉,龚晨,等.昆明某高层建筑消能减震设计[J].建筑结构,2019,49(7):116-121. [10] 吴宏磊,丁沽民,刘博.超高层建筑基于性能的组合消能减震结构设计及其应用[J].建筑结构学报,2020,41(3):12-24. [11] 陈斯聪,周云.BRB+VD消能减震结构体系分析研究[J].建筑结构,2016,45(11):85-90. [12] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程:JGJ 3-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010. [13] 中国工程建设标准化协会.建筑工程抗震性态设计通则:CECS 160:2004[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2004.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 101
- HTML全文浏览量: 20
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 0