EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE INFLUENCE OF WATER CONTENT ON THE SHEAR CHARACTERISTICS OF PILE SOIL-INTERFACE
-
摘要: 摩擦桩的承载性能决定于桩-土界面之间的剪切特性。为了研究含水率与土质条件等因素对摩擦桩侧摩阻力的影响,设计了摩擦桩的桩-土接触面剪切特性试验装置,进行了粉质黏土、粉土和细砂三种桩周土与三种含水率共9组室内试验。结果表明:摩擦桩的侧摩阻力随着桩的沉降均呈双曲线规律,其初始剪切刚度系数与达到极限摩阻力的沉降量临界值决定于土的类别和含水率大小,细砂的初始剪切刚度略高于相同压实系数的粉质黏土和细砂;而粉质黏土的极限侧摩阻力高于相同压实系数的粉土和细砂;含水率变化对粉土和细砂的极限摩阻力改变显著,而对粉质黏土的极限摩阻力变化相对不敏感,且极限摩阻力最大值均在最优含水率时发生。Abstract: The bearing capacity of friction piles depends on the shear characteristics of the pile-soil interface. In order to study the influence of moisture content and soil quality conditions on the friction resistance of friction piles, a test device for the pile-soil contact surface shear characteristics of friction piles was designed, and three types of silty clay, silt and fine sand were tested. There were 9 sets of laboratory tests on soil and three kinds of water content. The results showed that the lateral friction resistance of friction piles was hyperbolic with the settlement of the pile. The initial shear stiffness coefficient and the essential settlement for approaching ultimate lateral friction resistance were determined by the type of soil and the moisture content. The initial shear stiffness of fine sand was slightly higher than that of silty clay and fine sand with the same compaction coefficient; while the ultimate lateral frictional resistance of silty clay was higher than that of silty clay and fine sand with the same compaction coefficient; the ultimate frictional resistance of sand changed significantly, but it was relatively insensitive to the change of ultimate frictional resistance of silty clay, and the maximum value of the ultimate frictional resistance occured at the optimal moisture content.
-
Key words:
- pile foundation /
- pile-soil interface /
- moisture content /
- friction resistance /
- shear characteristics
-
张吉顺,华斌.土与不同桩侧表面粗糙度接触面剪切试验研究[J].结构工程师,2011,27(3):114-118. 张明义,邓安福. 桩-土滑动摩擦的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2002(2):246-249. 胡贺松,陈晓斌,唐孟雄,等. 随钻跟管桩桩-土接触面作用机制大型直剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2018,39(12):4325-4334. 胡兴昊,陈章宇,陈明杰,等.陈垃圾土地基中桩侧阻力及地基蠕变特性的试验研究[J].工业建筑,2018,48(11):106-110. 赵刚,李驰,斯日古楞.温度循环下桩土界面特性及桩侧摩阻力数值模拟[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2017,37(4):546-550. 唐俊巍,赵春风,赵程,等.桩端土对桩侧摩阻力影响的试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2011,33(增刊2):454-459. 王涛,褚卓,刘金砺,等.基于桩侧摩阻力概化模式的桩身压缩量计算[J].建筑结构,2019,49(17):130-135. 王卫东,李永辉,吴江斌.超长灌注桩桩-土界面剪切模型及其有限元模拟[J]. 岩土力学,2012,33(12):3818-3824. 骆湘勤,刘干斌,郑言东,等.考虑温度影响的能源桩桩-土界面荷载传递模型[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(1):171-179. YAZDANI S, HELWANY S, OLGUN G. Investigation of Thermal Loading Effects on Shaft Resistance of Energy Pile Using Laboratory-Scale Model[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2019, 145(9).DOI:10.1061/(ASCE) GT.1943-5606.0002088. 胡永强,汤连生,李兆源.静压桩桩-土界面滑动摩擦机制研究[J].岩土力学,2015,36(5):1288-1294. 李玲玲,王立忠,邢月龙.大直径钻孔灌注桩负摩阻力试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(3):583-590. 杨桦,杨敏.荷载传递法研究单桩荷载-沉降关系进展综述[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2006, 2(1):155-159,165.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 89
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0