预应力混凝土双T板早期反拱实测与分析

刘延明; 王晓锋; 赵勇

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG20080704

预应力混凝土双T板早期反拱实测与分析

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20080704

1. 同济大学土木工程学院, 上海 200092;
2. 中冶建筑研究总院有限公司, 北京 100088

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0701700）。

详细信息

作者简介:
刘延明,男,1996年出生,硕士研究生。

通讯作者:
赵勇,yongzhao@tongji.edu.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 85
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-08-07
- 网络出版日期: 2021-10-27

MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF EARLY-AGE CAMBER OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DOUBLETEES

1. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
2. Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co., Ltd., MCC Group, Beijing 100088, China

摘要

摘要: 对3根混凝土强度等级为C50的双T板构件进行了预应力放张反拱以及7 d反拱实测，并测试了与构件同材料且同条件养护混凝土试块的弹性模量和抗压强度。结果表明：蒸汽养护龄期30 h和自然养护龄期3 d时，混凝土抗压强度可达设计混凝土强度等级值的80%，但混凝土弹性模量仅为规范值的38%~55%；龄期7 d的混凝土弹性模量则可达到规范值；蒸汽养护试块的混凝土抗压强度和弹性模量相对自然养护试块发展更快。利用实测数据，回归分析得到了7 d内的混凝土弹性模量时效模型，并采用规范MC 2010收缩徐变模型，对构件7 d反拱值进行了估算，计算值与实测值符合较好。
- 预应力混凝土双T板 /
- 混凝土弹性模量 /
- 预应力筋放张 /
- 预应力反拱
Abstract: The cambers of three prestressed concrete doubletees with concrete strength grade of C50 at the moment of prestressed tendons releasing and the age of 7 days were measured, meanwhile, the elastic modulus and compressive strength of the concrete specimens with the same material and curing condition were tested. The result showed that when steam curing for 30 hours or natural curing for 3 days, the compressive strength of the concrete could reach 80% of the designed concrete strength grade value, but the elastic modulus of the concrete only reached 38~55% of the standard value. The elastic modulus of the tested concrete with an age of 7 days could reach its standard value. Compared to natural-cured concrete, the compressive strength and elastic modulus of steam-cured concrete developed more rapidly. The time-effect model of concrete elastic modulus within the age of 7 days was obtained by regression analysis. Then a simulation analysis of the cambers at the age of 7 days was carried out based on the model of creep and shrinkage in MC 2010, and the calculated values were almost coincident with the measured values.
- prestressed concrete doubletees /
- elastic modulus of concrete /
- releasing of prestressed tendons /
- prestressed camber

HTML全文

参考文献(12)

[1]	王茂宇,郑毅敏,赵勇.中美预制预应力混凝土双T板构件对比[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2014(8):42-45.
[2]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构工程施工质量验收规范:GB 50204-2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
[3]	张建仁,王海臣,杨伟军.混凝土早期抗压强度和弹性模量的试验研究[J].中外公路,2003(3):89-92.
[4]	冯太坤.混凝土的强度与抗压弹性模量增长变化初探[J].中国高新技术企业,2007(4):158.
[5]	International Federation for Structural Concrete. fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010:MC 2010[S]. Berlin, Germany:Wilhelm Ernst & Sohn, 2013.
[6]	吴志寰.早强剂对混凝土强度和弹性模量的影响[J].铁道建筑,2005(5):93-94.
[7]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构工程施工规范:GB 50666-2011[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
[8]	王薇,李亚楠.早强剂对混凝土早期抗压强度影响试验研究[J].建材发展导向,2019,17(4):93-95.
[9]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
[10]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50081-2016[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
[11]	陈洪光,许将.C50泵送混凝土弹性模量影响因素的试验研究[J].隧道建设,2012,32(6):802-805.
[12]	YOUAKIM S A, GHALI A, HIDA S E, et al. Prediction of Long-Term Prestress Losses[J]. PCI Journal, 2007, 52(2):116-130.