主余震序列地震作用下一级抗震预应力型钢混凝土空腹桁架转换层框架结构抗震性能研究

陈勇; 简斌; 刘冲

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG20071008

主余震序列地震作用下一级抗震预应力型钢混凝土空腹桁架转换层框架结构抗震性能研究

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20071008

陈勇¹,
简斌^2,3, ,,
刘冲^2,3

1. 东莞市大业施工图审查有限公司, 广东东莞 523000;
2. 重庆大学山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400045;
3. 重庆大学土木工程学院, 重庆 400045

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目（52078078）。

详细信息

作者简介:
陈勇,男,1980年出生,硕士,高级工程师。

通讯作者:
简斌,男,博士,教授,jianbin0215@163.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 130
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-07-10
- 网络出版日期: 2021-11-10
- 刊出日期: 2021-11-10

RESEARCH ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF FIRST ASEISMIC GRADE FRAMES WITH PSRC VIERENDEEL TRUSS TRANSFER STORIES UNDER MAIN-AFTER SHOCKS

CHEN Yong¹,
JIAN Bin^{2,3
, ,},
LIU Chong^2,3

1. Dongguan Daye Construction Drawings Review Co., Ltd., Dongguan 523000, China;
2. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China;
3. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China

摘要

摘要: 基于"三道防线抗震设防"的设计方法，以2榀8度（0.2g）设防区的上抬层数不同的一级抗震预应力型钢混凝土（PSRC）空腹桁架转换层框架结构为研究对象，完成了罕遇烈度水准下不同余震主震强度比（Δ_PGA=0，0.5，0.8，1.0）的系列弹塑性时程分析。然后，通过层间位移角、转动能力需求比和损伤指数等多个性能指标，对构件、防线以及结构整体等不同层次的抗震性能和损伤状况进行研究。结果表明：在主震及主余震序列地震作用下，结构均未发生整体破坏，当余震较强时，以损伤指数计算的个别上抬框架梁出现局部破坏；结构后续两道防线的损伤明显小于第一道防线，形成主要以第一道防线内梁铰耗能的"梁柱混合出铰机制"，"三道防线抗震设防"的设计原则得以实现；余震作用下，结构的整体损伤指数显著增加，且"二次损伤"明显；较大余震下，转换柱出铰普遍，甚至出现"层侧移机制"，应加强转换柱柱端弯矩增大措施。
- 预应力型钢混凝土 /
- 空腹桁架转换层 /
- 主余震地震动 /
- 损伤指数 /
- 弹塑性时程分析
Abstract: Based on the design method of "three-line defenses seismic fortification", two pieces of first aseismic grade frames with PSRC vierendeel truss transfer story and different numbers of the upper stories were designed under eight degree (0.2g) of seismic fortification level, and a series of elastic-plastic time-history analysis had been completed under rare intensity level of different intensity aftershocks (Δ_PGA=0, 0.5, 0.8, 1.0). After that, the seismic performance and damage of components, defenses, and structures were studied with inter-story drift ratios, ratios of demand to capacity of plastic hinge rotation, damage indexes and others. The results showed that the structures could avoid overall damage under the main-after shocks, and the damage indexes of a few upper beams appeared local damage when the aftershocks were strong; a "beam-column mixed hinge mechanism" could be formed to dissipate energy mainly with the beam hinges in the first line defense, and the damage indexes of the last two defenses were obviously smaller than the first one, so the design principle of "the three-line defenses seismic fortification" could be realized. Under the aftershocks, the overall damage indexes of structures increased significantly, and "the secondary damage" caused by the aftershocks were obviously; under larger aftershocks, hinges in the transfer columns were more widespread, and even a "mechanism of story lateral displacement" occured, so it was necessary to strengthen the moment magnifying measures of the transfer columns.
- prestressed steel reinforced concrete /
- vierendeel truss transfer story /
- main-after shock /
- damage index /
- elastic-plastic time-history analysis

HTML全文

参考文献(19)

[1]	蒋海昆,曲延军,李永莉,等. 中国大陆中强地震余震序列的部分统计特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 2006,49(4):1110-1117.
[2]	吴波,欧进萍. 主震与余震的震级统计关系及其地震动模型参数[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 1993,13(3):28-35.
[3]	于晓辉,吕大刚,肖寒. 主余震序列型地震动的增量损伤谱研究[J]. 工程力学, 2017,34(3):47-53 ,114.
[4]	MABINI S A. Effects of Duration and Aftershocks on Inelastic Design Earthquakes[C]//Proceedings of the Seventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Istanbul:1980.
[5]	AMADIO C, FRAGIACOMO M, RAJGELJ S. The Effects of Repeated Earthquake Ground Motions on the Non-Linear Response of SDOF Systems[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2010, 32(2):291-308.
[6]	吴波,欧进萍. 钢筋砼结构在主余震作用下的反应与损伤分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 1993,14(5):45-53.
[7]	ZHAI C H, WEN W P, LI S, et al. The Damage Investigation of Inelastic SDOF Structure Under the Mainshock-Aftershock Sequence-Type Ground Motions[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 59:30-41.
[8]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011-2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2016.
[9]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程:JGJ 3-2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
[10]	简斌,李东泽,林元,等. 一级抗震PSRC空腹桁架转换层框架结构三道防线抗震设防设计方法研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2021,42(1):155-164.
[11]	SASHI K K. Analytical Model of Inelastic Seismic Response of RC Structures[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1990,116(4):996-1017.
[12]	唐兴荣,蒋永生. 带预应力混凝土桁架转换层的多高层建筑结构设计和施工建议[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2000, 21(5):65-74.
[13]	傅传国,蒋永生,梁书亭. 大跨度叠层空腹桁架整体转换结构模型受力与抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2004, 25(1):36-44.
[14]	MAZZONI S, MCKENNA F, FENVES G L. OpenSees Command Language Manual[Z/OL]. Berkeley:Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of Califormia, 2009. (2009-07-01)[2017-05-21]. http://Open Sees. berkeley. edu/OpenSees/manuals/usermanual.
[15]	冀昆,温瑞智,任叶飞. 适用于我国抗震设计规范的天然强震记录选取[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2017,38(12):57-67.
[16]	MARTIN S, ROBERT G S. Seismic Damage Indices for Concrete Structures:A State-of-the-Art Review[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 1995, 11(2):319-349.
[17]	KUNNATH S K, REINHORN A M, ABEL J F. A Computational Tool for Evaluation of Seismic Performance of RC Buildings[J]. Computers & Structures, 1991,41(1):157-173.
[18]	PARK Y J, ANG A H S. Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering. 1985, 111(4):722-739,19.
[19]	杜修力,欧进萍. 建筑结构地震破坏评估模型[J]. 世界地震工程, 1991(3):52-58.