Mechanical Properties of Deformed Rebars Lapped in Spiral Stirrups Confined Grout-Filled Corrugated Pipes
-
摘要: 为验证预埋波纹管成孔钢筋约束浆锚搭接连接的可靠性,设计制作了60组、共180个接头试件并进行了单向拉伸试验,试件参数包括纵筋直径、混凝土强度、螺旋箍筋直径和螺距。结果表明:所有试件的抗拉强度与钢筋屈服强度标准值的比值均大于1.5,与钢筋抗拉强度标准值的比值大于1.1。对于直径10 mm和12 mm的接头试件,螺旋箍筋构造对接头抗拉强度的影响不明显。对于直径14 mm的试件,螺旋箍筋体积配箍率越大,箍筋螺距越小,混凝土损伤越小。在配箍率相差不大的情况下建议选择较小的箍筋直径和螺距。当螺旋箍筋配置为d4@50,纵筋公称直径≤14 mm时,搭接长度可取钢筋基本锚固长度。Abstract: 60 sets of 180 specimens were designed and manufactured to verify the reliability of the splice in which the rebars lapped in spiral stirrups confined grout-gilled corrugated pipes. The specimen parameters include longitudinal reinforcement diameter, concrete strength, and spiral rebar diameter and screw pitch. The monotonic tension loading test results indicated that the ultimate tensile strength of specimens all exceeded the 150 percent of the specified yielding strength and 110 percent of specified tensile strength of the lapped rebars. For the splice specimens with lapped rebar diameters of 10 mm and 12 mm, the effect of the spiral stirrups on the tensile strength of the splice specimens was not obvious. For the specimens with a rebar diameter of 14 mm, larger volume ratio and smaller screw pitch of the spiral stirrups could result in less damage of the concrete block under tension load. For a similar reinforcement ratio, it was recommended to use a smaller rebar diameter and screw pitch. When the spiral configuration was d4@50 and the nominal diameter of the longitudinal reinforcement was not more than 14 mm, the lap length could be taken as the basic anchorage length of rebar.
-
Key words:
- rebar lapped in grout-filled hole /
- spiral stirrup /
- rebar splice /
- lap length /
- precast concrete
-
[1] 郑永峰, 郭正兴, 张新. 套筒内腔构造对钢筋套筒灌浆连接黏结性能的影响[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2018, 39(9):158-166. [2] 郑永峰, 郭正兴. 变形灌浆套筒连接性能试验研究及有限元分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2016, 37(3):94-102. [3] 朱张峰, 郭正兴, 朱寅, 等.不同连接构造的装配式混凝土剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017(3):60-65. [4] 陈昕, 刘明, 姚大鹏, 等. 考虑波纹管组合钢筋浆锚搭接长度的装配式剪力墙拟静力试验[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2016, 56(6):616-623. [5] 李然,黄小坤,田春雨.三种装配整体式钢筋混凝土剪力墙结构受力性能对比研究[J].建筑结构学报,2018,39(增刊2):86-92. [6] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.装配式混凝土结构技术规程:JGJ 1-2014[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2014. [7] 姜洪斌,张海顺,刘文清,等.预制混凝土结构插入式预留孔灌浆钢筋锚固性能[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2011,43(4):28-31. [8] 马军卫, 尹万云, 刘守城,等. 钢筋约束浆锚搭接连接的试验研究[J].建筑结构, 2015, 45(2):32-35. [9] 毛小勇,高奕昕.约束浆锚搭接连接高温性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2020,41(7):117-123. [10] 徐文杰, 陶里, 郑清林. 浆锚搭接连接缺陷分类及形成机理[J]. 施工技术, 2018, 47(21):93-96. [11] EINEA A, YEHIA S, TADROS M K. Lap splices in confined concrete[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1999, 96(6):947-955. [12] DARWIN D, LUTZ L R A, ZUO J. Recommended provisions and commentary on development and lap splice lengths for deformed reinforcing bars in tension[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2005, 102(6):892-900. [13] HOSSEINI S J A, RAHMAN A B A. Effects of spiral confinement to the bond behavior of deformed reinforcement bars subjected to axial tension[J]. Engineering Structure, 2016, 112:1-13. [14] HASSAN T K, LUCIER G W, RIZKALLA S H. Splice strength of large diameter, high strength steel reinforcing bars[J]. Construction and Building Material, 2012, 26:216-225. [15] TEPFERS R. Cracking of concrete cover along anchored deformedreinforcing bars[J]. Magazine of Concrete Research,1979, 31(106):3-12. [16] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010-2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 116
- HTML全文浏览量: 6
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0